MLS (SZSE:002745) Is Finding It Tricky To Allocate Its Capital
MLS (SZSE:002745) Is Finding It Tricky To Allocate Its Capital
When it comes to investing, there are some useful financial metrics that can warn us when a business is potentially in trouble. When we see a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) in conjunction with a declining base of capital employed, that's often how a mature business shows signs of aging. This indicates the company is producing less profit from its investments and its total assets are decreasing. And from a first read, things don't look too good at MLS (SZSE:002745), so let's see why.
談到投資,有一些有用的財務指標可以在企業潛在陷入困境時警告我們。當我們看到經濟衰退時退貨在資本使用(ROCE)下降的情況下基地對於已動用的資本,這往往是成熟企業顯示出老化跡象的原因。這表明該公司從投資中產生的利潤正在減少,其總資產正在減少。從第一眼看,事情看起來並不太好MLS(SZSE:002745),讓我們看看為什麼。
Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)
瞭解資本回報率(ROCE)
For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for MLS:
對於那些不確定ROCE是什麼的人,它衡量的是一家公司可以從其業務中使用的資本產生的稅前利潤。分析師使用以下公式來計算MLS:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
已動用資本回報率=息稅前收益(EBIT)?(總資產-流動負債)
0.019 = CN¥289m ÷ (CN¥24b - CN¥8.4b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2023).
0.019=人民幣2.89億?(人民幣24億元-人民幣84億元)(根據截至2023年6月的往績12個月計算)。
Thus, MLS has an ROCE of 1.9%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Semiconductor industry average of 4.1%.
因此,MLS的淨資產收益率為1.9%。歸根結底,這是一個較低的回報率,表現低於半導體行業4.1%的平均水準。
See our latest analysis for MLS
查看我們對MLS的最新分析
In the above chart we have measured MLS' prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering MLS here for free.
在上面的圖表中,我們衡量了MLS之前的ROCE和它之前的表現,但可以說,未來更重要。如果你願意,你可以查看這裡報道MLS的分析師的預測免費的。
How Are Returns Trending?
回報趨勢如何?
There is reason to be cautious about MLS, given the returns are trending downwards. About five years ago, returns on capital were 8.1%, however they're now substantially lower than that as we saw above. And on the capital employed front, the business is utilizing roughly the same amount of capital as it was back then. This combination can be indicative of a mature business that still has areas to deploy capital, but the returns received aren't as high due potentially to new competition or smaller margins. If these trends continue, we wouldn't expect MLS to turn into a multi-bagger.
鑑於MLS的回報率呈下降趨勢,我們有理由對MLS保持謹慎。大約五年前,資本回報率為8.1%,但現在大大低於我們上面看到的水準。在已動用資本方面,該公司利用的資本與當時大致相同。這一組合可能表明,一家成熟的企業仍有需要配置資本的領域,但由於潛在的新競爭或利潤率較低,獲得的回報並不那麼高。如果這些趨勢繼續下去,我們預計美國職業足球大聯盟不會變成一個多袋子。
On a related note, MLS has decreased its current liabilities to 35% of total assets. So we could link some of this to the decrease in ROCE. What's more, this can reduce some aspects of risk to the business because now the company's suppliers or short-term creditors are funding less of its operations. Some would claim this reduces the business' efficiency at generating ROCE since it is now funding more of the operations with its own money.
與此相關的是,MLS已將其流動負債降至總資產的35%。因此,我們可以將其中一些因素與淨資產收益率的下降聯繫起來。更重要的是,這可以降低業務的某些方面的風險,因為現在該公司的供應商或短期債權人為其運營提供的資金減少了。一些人會說,這降低了企業產生淨資產收益率的效率,因為它現在用自己的錢為更多的運營提供資金。
The Bottom Line
底線
In the end, the trend of lower returns on the same amount of capital isn't typically an indication that we're looking at a growth stock. Investors haven't taken kindly to these developments, since the stock has declined 25% from where it was five years ago. With underlying trends that aren't great in these areas, we'd consider looking elsewhere.
歸根結底,同樣數額的資本回報率下降的趨勢,通常並不意味著我們看到的是一隻成長型股票。投資者對這些動態並不看好,因為該公司股價較五年前下跌了25%。鑑於這些領域的潛在趨勢不是很好,我們會考慮將目光投向其他地方。
On a final note, we've found 3 warning signs for MLS that we think you should be aware of.
最後一點,我們發現美國職業棒球大聯盟的3個警告標誌我們認為你應該意識到.
For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.
對於那些喜歡投資於穩固的公司,看看這個免費資產負債表穩健、股本回報率高的公司名單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫.或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是暗示Wallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性.我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議.它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況.我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析.請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內.Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉.