share_log

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Stem, Inc.'s (NYSE:STEM) Recent 14% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Stem, Inc.'s (NYSE:STEM) Recent 14% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

機構所有者可能會像Stem, Inc. 一樣採取戲劇性的行動s(紐約證券交易所代碼:STEM)最近下跌14%加劇了一年的虧損
Simply Wall St ·  2023/10/26 07:05

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Stem implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 23 shareholders
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 機構持有Stem的大量股份意味著它們對該公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 51%的業務由前23名股東持有
  • 內部人士最近的收購

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Stem, Inc. (NYSE:STEM), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 72% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

為了弄清誰真正控制了Stem,Inc.(紐約證券交易所市場代碼:STEM),瞭解企業的所有權結構是很重要的。機構持有該公司72%的股份,擁有該公司的最高股份。換句話說,該集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大(或損失最大)。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 14% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 77% for shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Stem, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

上週,機構投資者的持股價值下降了14%。這群投資者可能尤其擔心當前的虧損,這增加了股東一年來77%的虧損。機構通常被稱為“市場推動者”,在影響任何股票的價格動態方面擁有巨大的影響力。因此,如果下跌趨勢持續,機構可能面臨出售Stem的壓力,這可能會對個人投資者產生負面影響。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Stem.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Stem的什麼。

See our latest analysis for Stem

查看我們對Stem的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:STEM Ownership Breakdown October 26th 2023
紐約證券交易所:STEM所有權分解2023年10月26日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stem?

關於Stem,機構所有權告訴了我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,以基準來衡量自己,因此一旦一隻股票被納入主要指數,它們往往會對這只股票變得更加熱情.我們預計,大多數公司都會有一些機構登記在冊,特別是在它們正在增長的情況下.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Stem. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Stem, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在Stem擁有相當多的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因為機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看Stem過去的收益軌跡(見下圖)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:STEM Earnings and Revenue Growth October 26th 2023
紐約證券交易所:2023年10月26日抑制收益和收入增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Stem. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 8.8%. The second and third largest shareholders are BlackRock, Inc. and Schroder Investment Management Limited, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 6.8%.

由於機構投資者擁有一半以上的已發行股票,董事會可能不得不關注他們的偏好。對沖基金在Stem的股份並不多。該公司的最大股東是先鋒集團,持股8.8%。第二和第三大股東是貝萊德股份有限公司和施羅德投資管理有限公司,持股比例相同,分別為6.8%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 23 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股東登記表,我們可以看到,前23名股東控制了51%的所有權,這意味著沒有單一股東擁有所有權的多數股權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股可以增加你的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解一隻股票的預期表現也是一個很好的做法.有相當數量的分析師追蹤該股,因此瞭解他們對未來的總體看法可能是有用的.

Insider Ownership Of Stem

Stem的內部人所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算數的.公司管理層管理企業,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

內部人持股是積極的,當它標誌著領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時.然而,高內部人持股也可以給公司內部的一個小團體帶來巨大的權力.在某些情況下,這可能是負面的.

We can see that insiders own shares in Stem, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$18m worth of the US$494m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以看到,內部人士持有Stem,Inc.的股份。作為個人,內部人士總共擁有這家市值4.94億美元的公司價值1800萬美元。這至少表明了一些一致。你可以點擊這裡,看看這些內部人士是一直在買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 25% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的普通公眾持有該公司25%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Stem , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但為了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他資訊。例如,考慮一下無處不在的投資風險幽靈。我們已經確定了三個警告信號與Stem合作,瞭解他們應該是你投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終這就是未來,而不是過去,這將決定這家企業的所有者將做得多好。因此,我們認為,看看這份免費報告是明智的,它顯示了分析師是否預測到了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數位是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間.這可能與全年的年度報告數位不一致.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫.或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是暗示Wallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性.我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議.它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況.我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析.請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內.Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉.

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論