While Institutions Invested in Jushri Technologies, INC. (SZSE:300762) Benefited From Last Week's 13% Gain, Individual Investors Stood to Gain the Most
While Institutions Invested in Jushri Technologies, INC. (SZSE:300762) Benefited From Last Week's 13% Gain, Individual Investors Stood to Gain the Most
Key Insights
主要見解
- Jushri Technologies' significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- A total of 16 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Institutions own 38% of Jushri Technologies
- Jushri Technologies的重要個人投資者所有權表明,關鍵決策受到來自公眾的股東的影響
- 共有16名投資者持有該公司50%的多數股權
- 機構擁有Jushri Technologies 38%的股份
A look at the shareholders of Jushri Technologies, INC. (SZSE:300762) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 44% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看Jushri Technologies,Inc.的股東。(SZSE#30076;能告訴我們,哪個組最強。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有該公司的最大份額,擁有44%的所有權。換句話說,該集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最多)。
Individual investors gained the most after market cap touched CN¥11b last week, while institutions who own 38% also benefitted.
在上週市值觸及110億元人民幣後,個人投資者的收益最大,而持有38%股份的機構投資者也從中受益。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Jushri Technologies.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了Jushri Technologies的不同所有權群體。
View our latest analysis for Jushri Technologies
查看我們對巨石科技的最新分析
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jushri Technologies?
機構所有權告訴了我們關於巨石科技的什麼資訊?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,以基準來衡量自己,因此一旦一隻股票被納入主要指數,它們往往會對這只股票變得更加熱情.我們預計,大多數公司都會有一些機構登記在冊,特別是在它們正在增長的情況下.
Jushri Technologies already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Jushri Technologies' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Jushri Technologies已經有機構在股票註冊表上。事實上,他們在該公司擁有可觀的股份。這在專業投資者中顯示出一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因為機構有時會做出錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得看看下面Jushri Technologies的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Jushri Technologies. Our data shows that Shanghai Shuangyou Information Technology Co., Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 18% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 4.7% and 4.6% of the stock.
我們注意到,對沖基金對Jushri Technologies沒有任何有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,上海雙優資訊技術有限公司,有限公司是最大的股東,擁有18%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約4.7%和4.6%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 16 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記表,我們可以看到,50%的所有權由前16名股東控制,這意味著沒有單一股東擁有所有權的多數股權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以瞭解風向也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師追蹤該股,因此瞭解他們對未來的總體看法可能是有用的。
Insider Ownership Of Jushri Technologies
Jushri Technologies的內部人所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人的定義可能是主觀的,而且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理層管理企業,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事.然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責.
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.
我們的數據不能證實董事會成員是個人持股。並不是所有司法管轄區都有關於披露內部人所有權的相同規則,在這裡,我們可能遺漏了一些預期。因此,您可以單擊此處瞭解有關這位CEO的更多資訊。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 44% stake in Jushri Technologies. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公眾,通常是個人投資者,持有Jushri Technologies 44%的股份。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私營公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 18%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到,私營公司擁有18%的發行股份。可能值得深入調查一下。如果相關方,如內部人士,在這些私營公司中有利益,應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
接下來的步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Jushri Technologies .
我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但為了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他資訊。為此,您應該意識到3個警示標誌Jushri科技公司的產品
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你更願意瞭解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這一預期免費關於分析師預測的報告.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數位是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間.這可能與全年的年度報告數位不一致.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫.或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是暗示Wallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性.我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議.它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況.我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析.請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內.Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉.