The Five-year Loss for Monro (NASDAQ:MNRO) Shareholders Likely Driven by Its Shrinking Earnings
The Five-year Loss for Monro (NASDAQ:MNRO) Shareholders Likely Driven by Its Shrinking Earnings
Generally speaking long term investing is the way to go. But along the way some stocks are going to perform badly. For example the Monro, Inc. (NASDAQ:MNRO) share price dropped 63% over five years. That is extremely sub-optimal, to say the least. And it's not just long term holders hurting, because the stock is down 43% in the last year. Shareholders have had an even rougher run lately, with the share price down 23% in the last 90 days. This could be related to the recent financial results - you can catch up on the most recent data by reading our company report.
一般而言,長期投資是必經之路。但在此過程中,一些股票將表現不佳。例如,門羅公司(納斯達克股票代碼:MNRO)的股價在五年內下跌了63%。至少可以說,這非常不理想。受傷的不僅僅是長揸者,因爲該股去年下跌了43%。股東們最近的表現更加艱難,在過去的90天中,股價下跌了23%。這可能與最近的財務業績有關——你可以通過閱讀我們的公司報告來了解最新的數據。
The recent uptick of 7.8% could be a positive sign of things to come, so let's take a look at historical fundamentals.
最近7.8%的上漲可能是即將發生的事情的積極信號,所以讓我們來看看歷史基本面。
Check out our latest analysis for Monro
查看我們對 Monro 的最新分析
To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS).
用本傑明·格雷厄姆的話來說:從短期來看,市場是一臺投票機器,但從長遠來看,它是一臺稱重機。研究市場情緒如何隨着時間的推移而變化的一種方法是研究公司股價與其每股收益(EPS)之間的相互作用。
Looking back five years, both Monro's share price and EPS declined; the latter at a rate of 13% per year. Readers should note that the share price has fallen faster than the EPS, at a rate of 18% per year, over the period. This implies that the market was previously too optimistic about the stock.
回顧五年,Monro的股價和每股收益均下跌;後者以每年13%的速度下降。讀者應注意,在此期間,股價的下跌速度快於每股收益,每年下降18%。這意味着市場此前對該股過於樂觀。
The company's earnings per share (over time) is depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers).
該公司的每股收益(隨着時間的推移)如下圖所示(點擊查看確切數字)。
We consider it positive that insiders have made significant purchases in the last year. Having said that, most people consider earnings and revenue growth trends to be a more meaningful guide to the business. It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on Monro's earnings, revenue and cash flow.
我們認爲,去年內部人士進行了大量收購,這是積極的。話雖如此,大多數人認爲收益和收入增長趨勢是更有意義的業務指南。我們關於門羅收益、收入和現金流的免費報告可能值得一看。
What About Dividends?
分紅呢?
When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. We note that for Monro the TSR over the last 5 years was -60%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!
在考慮投資回報時,重要的是要考慮兩者之間的區別 股東總回報 (TSR) 和 股價回報。基於股息再投資的假設,股東總回報率包括任何分拆或貼現資本籌集的價值以及任何股息。可以說,股東總回報率可以更全面地描述股票產生的回報。我們注意到,對於Monro而言,過去5年的股東總回報率爲-60%,好於上述股價回報率。這在很大程度上是其股息支付的結果!
A Different Perspective
不同的視角
Investors in Monro had a tough year, with a total loss of 41% (including dividends), against a market gain of about 16%. However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. Unfortunately, last year's performance may indicate unresolved challenges, given that it was worse than the annualised loss of 10% over the last half decade. We realise that Baron Rothschild has said investors should "buy when there is blood on the streets", but we caution that investors should first be sure they are buying a high quality business. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Even so, be aware that Monro is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
Monro的投資者度過了艱難的一年,總虧損41%(包括股息),而市場漲幅約爲16%。但是,請記住,即使是最好的股票有時也會在十二個月內表現遜於市場。不幸的是,去年的表現可能表明挑戰尚未得到解決,因爲這比過去五年來10%的年化虧損還要嚴重。我們意識到,羅斯柴爾德男爵曾說過,投資者應該 “在街頭流血時買入”,但我們警告說,投資者應首先確保他們購買的是高質量的企業。儘管值得考慮市場狀況可能對股價產生的不同影響,但還有其他因素更爲重要。即便如此,請注意,Monro在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,您應該知道...
If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: insiders have been buying them).
如果你想與管理層一起購買股票,那麼你可能會喜歡這份免費的公司名單。(提示:業內人士一直在購買它們)。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。