share_log

With 81% Ownership of the Shares, Fastenal Company (NASDAQ:FAST) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 81% Ownership of the Shares, Fastenal Company (NASDAQ:FAST) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

Fastenal Company(納斯達克股票代碼:FAST)擁有81%的股份所有權,主要由機構所有者主導
Simply Wall St ·  2023/11/08 06:49

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Fastenal's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 49% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構持有的數量顯著較高,意味着Fastenal的股票價格對它們的交易行爲很敏感。
  • 前25大股東擁有該公司的49%。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls Fastenal Company (NASDAQ:FAST), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 81% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想知道誰真正控制了Fastenal公司(NASDAQ:FAST),那麼您需要看看它的股權登記冊組成。我們可以看到,機構擁有81%的股權,佔比最多。也就是說,如果股票上漲,這個群體將最受益(或者如果發生下行,則最虧損)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有大量的資金和研究能力,因此機構所有權往往具有相當的分量,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構在一家企業中投資的規模可視爲該企業的一項重要資產。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Fastenal.

下圖是對Fastenal不同所有權群體的詳細註釋。

View our latest analysis for Fastenal

查看我們對Fastenal的最新分析。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:FAST Ownership Breakdown November 8th 2023
NasdaqGS:FASt所有權結構於2023年11月8日。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fastenal?

機構持股量告訴我們關於Fastenal的信息。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Fastenal already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Fastenal's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Fastenal的股權登記簿上已經有機構的持股。事實上,他們擁有該公司的相當大的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了該股票,並且他們喜歡它。但像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,存在他們正在進行“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣一個交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速賣出股票。這種風險在一家沒有成長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到Fastenal的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事中總是會有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:FAST Earnings and Revenue Growth November 8th 2023
NasdaqGS:FASt收益和營業收入增長於2023年11月8日。

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Fastenal is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.9% and 4.8% of the stock.

由於機構投資者擁有超過半數以上的發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。Fastenal未被對沖基金所擁有。當前,The Vanguard Group,Inc.是公司最大的股東,擁有12%的流通股,而第二和第三大的股東持有約7.9%和4.8%的股票。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Fastenal

Fastenal內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Fastenal Company in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$62m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的數據表明,內部人士在自己的名下僅擁有不到1%的Fastenal Company股份。它是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部人士擁有公司的大部分股份會令人驚訝。儘管他們的持股比例不到1%,但是我們可以看到董事會成員共計持有價值爲6200萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員擁有股份是好事,但檢查這些內部人士是否一直在購買股份也許很值得。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Fastenal. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

佔有19%的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對Fastenal有一定的影響力。儘管擁有此類所有權,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則此類股東的影響可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Fastenal better, we need to consider many other factors.

思考擁有股份的不同群體總是值得的,但要更好地理解Fastenal,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論