Cricut, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CRCT) Recent 9.2% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures
Cricut, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CRCT) Recent 9.2% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Cricut implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 57% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Petrus Trust Company, LTA)
- Insiders have sold recently
- 機構在Cricut的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
- 公司57%的股份由單一股東持有(彼得魯斯信託公司,LTA)
- 業內人士最近賣出了
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Cricut, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRCT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 63% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制着Cricut, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:CRCT),了解企業的所有權結構非常重要。持有公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲63%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最大(或損失最大)。
And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 9.2% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 9.1% for shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Cricut which might hurt individual investors.
上週該公司股價下跌9.2%後,機構投資者遭受了最大的損失。這部分投資者可能特別擔心當前的虧損,這使股東一年虧損9.1%。機構也被稱爲 “智能貨幣”,對股票的價格走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果繼續下跌,機構投資者可能會被迫出售Cricut,這可能會傷害個人投資者。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Cricut.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Cricut的哪些信息。
See our latest analysis for Cricut
查看我們對Cricut的最新分析
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20231109/0-a4ada1ce65908e4fe4c664298363dced-0-88d7b0a73c70414841e4f0049d28016b.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cricut?
機構所有權告訴我們關於Cricut的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Cricut. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Cricut, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如您所見,機構投資者持有Cricut的大量股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看一下Cricut過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20231109/0-a4ada1ce65908e4fe4c664298363dced-1-84f985ec30471a713c253ecd5ca53799.png/big)
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 6.2% of Cricut. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Our data shows that Petrus Trust Company, LTA is the largest shareholder with 57% of shares outstanding. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 13% and 6.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Ashish Arora, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。我們的數據表明,對沖基金擁有Cricut6.2%的股份。這引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或者帶來能夠爲股東創造短期價值的變革。我們的數據顯示,Petrus Trust Company,LTA是最大的股東,擁有57%的已發行股份。從本質上講,這意味着他們對公司的未來具有廣泛的影響力,如果不是完全的控制權。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有13%和6.2%的已發行股份。第二大股東阿希什·阿羅拉也恰好擁有首席執行官的頭銜。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Cricut
Cricut 的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終算在內。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Cricut, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.8b, and insiders have US$325m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看來內部人士擁有Cricut, Inc.的很大一部分股份。它的市值僅爲18億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值3.25億美元的股票。這非常重要。大多數人會說,這表明了與股東的良好一致性,尤其是在如此規模的公司中。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司13%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Cricut better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Cricut (of which 1 can't be ignored!) you should know about.
始終值得考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體。但是,爲了更好地了解Cricut,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。比如說,比如風險。每家公司都有它們,我們發現了 Cricut 的 2 個警告信號(其中 1 個不容忽視!)你應該知道。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。