share_log

Is RadNet, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RDNT) 3.7% ROE Worse Than Average?

Is RadNet, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RDNT) 3.7% ROE Worse Than Average?

是 RadNet, Inc. 's(納斯達克股票代碼:RDNT)3.7% 的投資回報率比平均水平差?
Simply Wall St ·  2023/11/15 05:33

Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). We'll use ROE to examine RadNet, Inc. (NASDAQ:RDNT), by way of a worked example.

許多投資者仍在學習分析股票時可能有用的各種指標。本文適用於那些想了解股本回報率(ROE)的人。舉一個有效的例子,我們將使用投資回報率來研究RadNet公司(納斯達克股票代碼:RDNT)。

Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. Simply put, it is used to assess the profitability of a company in relation to its equity capital.

股本回報率或投資回報率是用於評估公司管理層利用公司資本效率的關鍵衡量標準。簡而言之,它用於評估公司相對於其股權資本的盈利能力。

Check out our latest analysis for RadNet

看看我們對 RadNet 的最新分析

How To Calculate Return On Equity?

如何計算股本回報率?

Return on equity can be calculated by using the formula:

股本回報率可以使用以下公式計算:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

股本回報率 = 淨利潤(來自持續經營)÷ 股東權益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for RadNet is:

因此,根據上述公式,RadNet的投資回報率爲:

3.7% = US$29m ÷ US$796m (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2023).

3.7% = 2900萬美元 ¥7.96億美元(基於截至2023年9月的過去十二個月)。

The 'return' is the income the business earned over the last year. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.04 in profit.

“回報” 是企業在過去一年中獲得的收入。對此進行概念化的一種方法是,該公司每擁有1美元的股東資本,就能獲得0.04美元的利潤。

Does RadNet Have A Good Return On Equity?

RadNet 的股本回報率是否良好?

By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. As shown in the graphic below, RadNet has a lower ROE than the average (11%) in the Healthcare industry classification.

通過將公司的投資回報率與其行業平均水平進行比較,我們可以快速衡量其表現如何。重要的是,這遠非一個完美的衡量標準,因爲各公司在相同的行業分類中差異很大。如下圖所示,RadNet的投資回報率低於醫療保健行業分類中的平均水平(11%)。

roe
NasdaqGM:RDNT Return on Equity November 15th 2023
納斯達克GMM: RDNT 股本回報率 2023 年 11 月 15 日

Unfortunately, that's sub-optimal. Although, we think that a lower ROE could still mean that a company has the opportunity to better its returns with the use of leverage, provided its existing debt levels are low. A company with high debt levels and low ROE is a combination we like to avoid given the risk involved. You can see the 3 risks we have identified for RadNet by visiting our risks dashboard for free on our platform here.

不幸的是,這並不理想。但是,我們認爲,只要現有債務水平較低,較低的投資回報率仍可能意味着公司有機會通過使用槓桿提高回報。鑑於所涉及的風險,高債務水平和低投資回報率的公司是我們希望避免的組合。您可以通過訪問我們的 RadNet 查看我們爲RadNet確定的三種風險 風險儀表板 在我們的平台上免費使用。

Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE

爲什麼在考慮投資回報率時應該考慮債務

Companies usually need to invest money to grow their profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the debt required for growth will boost returns, but will not impact the shareholders' equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.

公司通常需要投資資金來增加利潤。投資現金可以來自上一年的利潤(留存收益)、發行新股或借款。在第一和第二種情況下,投資回報率將反映現金用於企業投資的情況。在後一種情況下,增長所需的債務將提高回報,但不會影響股東權益。這將使投資回報率看起來比不使用債務時更好。

RadNet's Debt And Its 3.7% ROE

RadNet的債務及其3.7%的投資回報率

RadNet does use a high amount of debt to increase returns. It has a debt to equity ratio of 1.08. With a fairly low ROE, and significant use of debt, it's hard to get excited about this business at the moment. Debt increases risk and reduces options for the company in the future, so you generally want to see some good returns from using it.

RadNet確實使用大量債務來增加回報。它的負債權益比率爲1.08。由於投資回報率相當低,而且債務使用量很大,目前很難對這項業務感到興奮。債務會增加風險,減少公司未來的選擇,因此您通常希望從使用債務中獲得豐厚的回報。

Conclusion

結論

Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.

股本回報率是我們比較不同公司業務質量的一種方式。能夠在沒有過多債務的情況下實現高股本回報率的公司通常質量良好。如果兩家公司的債權與股本水平大致相同,而一家的投資回報率更高,我通常更喜歡投資回報率更高的公司。

But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

但是,當企業質量很高時,市場通常會以反映這一點的價格出價。重要的是要考慮其他因素,例如未來的利潤增長以及未來需要多少投資。因此,我認爲可能值得查看這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

But note: RadNet may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with high ROE and low debt.

但請注意:RadNet可能不是最值得購買的股票。因此,來看看這份投資回報率高、債務低的有趣公司的免費清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論