Here's Why New York Times (NYSE:NYT) Has Caught The Eye Of Investors
Here's Why New York Times (NYSE:NYT) Has Caught The Eye Of Investors
For beginners, it can seem like a good idea (and an exciting prospect) to buy a company that tells a good story to investors, even if it currently lacks a track record of revenue and profit. But as Peter Lynch said in One Up On Wall Street, 'Long shots almost never pay off.' Loss-making companies are always racing against time to reach financial sustainability, so investors in these companies may be taking on more risk than they should.
對於初學者來說,收購一家向投資者講述好故事的公司似乎是個好主意(也是一個令人興奮的前景),即使該公司目前缺乏收入和利潤記錄。但是正如彼得·林奇所說 One Up On Wall 街,“遠射幾乎永遠不會得到回報。”虧損的公司總是與時間賽跑以實現財務可持續性,因此這些公司的投資者承擔的風險可能超出了應有的範圍。
Despite being in the age of tech-stock blue-sky investing, many investors still adopt a more traditional strategy; buying shares in profitable companies like New York Times (NYSE:NYT). While this doesn't necessarily speak to whether it's undervalued, the profitability of the business is enough to warrant some appreciation - especially if its growing.
儘管處於科技股藍天投資時代,但許多投資者仍然採用更傳統的策略:購買紐約時報(紐約證券交易所代碼:NYT)等盈利公司的股票。儘管這並不一定說明其估值是否被低估,但該業務的盈利能力足以保證一定的升值——尤其是在其增長的情況下。
View our latest analysis for New York Times
查看我們對《紐約時報》的最新分析
How Fast Is New York Times Growing?
《紐約時報》的增長速度有多快?
Generally, companies experiencing growth in earnings per share (EPS) should see similar trends in share price. Therefore, there are plenty of investors who like to buy shares in companies that are growing EPS. Over the last three years, New York Times has grown EPS by 7.8% per year. While that sort of growth rate isn't anything to write home about, it does show the business is growing.
通常,每股收益(EPS)增長的公司的股價應該會出現類似的趨勢。因此,有很多投資者喜歡購買每股收益不斷增長的公司的股票。在過去的三年中,《紐約時報》每股收益每年增長7.8%。儘管這種增長率並不例外,但它確實表明業務正在增長。
Careful consideration of revenue growth and earnings before interest and taxation (EBIT) margins can help inform a view on the sustainability of the recent profit growth. Our analysis has highlighted that New York Times' revenue from operations did not account for all of their revenue in the previous 12 months, so our analysis of its margins might not accurately reflect the underlying business. While we note New York Times achieved similar EBIT margins to last year, revenue grew by a solid 8.1% to US$2.4b. That's encouraging news for the company!
仔細考慮收入增長和息稅前收益(EBIT)利潤率有助於爲近期利潤增長的可持續性提供信息。我們的分析突出表明,《紐約時報》的收入 來自運營 沒有考慮到他們在過去12個月中的所有收入,因此我們對其利潤率的分析可能無法準確反映基礎業務。儘管我們注意到《紐約時報》的息稅前利潤率與去年相似,但收入穩步增長了8.1%,達到24億美元。這對公司來說是個令人鼓舞的消息!
You can take a look at the company's revenue and earnings growth trend, in the chart below. Click on the chart to see the exact numbers.
您可以在下圖中查看該公司的收入和收益增長趨勢。點擊圖表查看確切數字。
You don't drive with your eyes on the rear-view mirror, so you might be more interested in this free report showing analyst forecasts for New York Times' future profits.
你開車時不要注視後視鏡,因此你可能會對這份免費報告更感興趣,該報告顯示了分析師對《紐約時報》未來利潤的預測。
Are New York Times Insiders Aligned With All Shareholders?
《紐約時報》內部人士是否與所有股東保持一致?
Owing to the size of New York Times, we wouldn't expect insiders to hold a significant proportion of the company. But we are reassured by the fact they have invested in the company. As a matter of fact, their holding is valued at US$45m. That shows significant buy-in, and may indicate conviction in the business strategy. While their ownership only accounts for 0.6%, this is still a considerable amount at stake to encourage the business to maintain a strategy that will deliver value to shareholders.
由於《紐約時報》的規模,我們預計內部人士不會持有該公司的很大一部分股份。但是他們投資了該公司,這讓我們感到放心。事實上,他們的持股價值爲4500萬美元。這表明了大量的支持,也可能表明對業務戰略的信念。儘管他們的所有權僅佔0.6%,但要鼓勵企業維持爲股東創造價值的戰略,這仍然是一個相當大的風險。
Should You Add New York Times To Your Watchlist?
您是否應該將《紐約時報》添加到您的關注列表中?
As previously touched on, New York Times is a growing business, which is encouraging. If that's not enough on its own, there is also the rather notable levels of insider ownership. The combination definitely favoured by investors so consider keeping the company on a watchlist. If you think New York Times might suit your style as an investor, you could go straight to its annual report, or you could first check our discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation for the company.
如前所述,《紐約時報》是一家成長中的企業,這令人鼓舞。如果這本身還不夠,那麼內部所有權的水平也相當可觀。這種組合肯定受到投資者的青睞,因此可以考慮將公司保留在觀察名單上。如果你認爲《紐約時報》可能適合你作爲投資者的風格,你可以直接查看其年度報告,也可以先查看我們對該公司的折扣現金流(DCF)估值。
There's always the possibility of doing well buying stocks that are not growing earnings and do not have insiders buying shares. But for those who consider these important metrics, we encourage you to check out companies that do have those features. You can access a free list of them here.
買入這樣的股票總是有可能表現良好 不是 不斷增長的收入和 不要 讓內部人士購買股票。但是,對於那些考慮這些重要指標的人,我們鼓勵您查看確實具有這些功能的公司。您可以在此處訪問它們的免費列表。
Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction.
請注意,本文中討論的內幕交易是指相關司法管轄區內應報告的交易。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。