Shareholders in BOK Financial (NASDAQ:BOKF) Are in the Red If They Invested a Year Ago
Shareholders in BOK Financial (NASDAQ:BOKF) Are in the Red If They Invested a Year Ago
BOK Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:BOKF) shareholders should be happy to see the share price up 10% in the last month. But that doesn't change the fact that the returns over the last year have been less than pleasing. In fact, the price has declined 30% in a year, falling short of the returns you could get by investing in an index fund.
BOK金融公司(納斯達克股票代碼:BOKF)的股東應該很高興看到上個月股價上漲了10%。但這並不能改變這樣一個事實,即去年的回報並不令人滿意。實際上,價格在一年內下跌了30%,未達到投資指數基金所能獲得的回報。
Since shareholders are down over the longer term, lets look at the underlying fundamentals over the that time and see if they've been consistent with returns.
由於從長遠來看,股東會下跌,讓我們來看看那段時間的潛在基本面,看看它們與回報是否一致。
View our latest analysis for BOK Financial
查看我們對BOK Financial的最新分析
To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time.
用本傑明·格雷厄姆的話來說:從短期來看,市場是一臺投票機,但從長遠來看,它是一臺稱重機。通過比較每股收益(EPS)和股價隨時間推移的變化,我們可以了解投資者對公司的態度如何隨着時間的推移而變化。
During the unfortunate twelve months during which the BOK Financial share price fell, it actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 34%. It could be that the share price was previously over-hyped.
在BOK Financial股價下跌的不幸十二個月中,其每股收益(EPS)實際上增長了34%。可能是股價此前被過度炒作。
It's surprising to see the share price fall so much, despite the improved EPS. So it's easy to justify a look at some other metrics.
令人驚訝的是,儘管每股收益有所改善,但股價卻大幅下跌。因此,很容易證明看看其他一些指標是合理的。
BOK Financial's revenue is actually up 18% over the last year. Since the fundamental metrics don't readily explain the share price drop, there might be an opportunity if the market has overreacted.
BOK Financial的收入實際上比去年增長了18%。由於基本面指標無法輕易解釋股價下跌,因此如果市場反應過度,可能會有機會。
The image below shows how earnings and revenue have tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail).
下圖顯示了收入和收入在一段時間內的跟蹤情況(如果你點擊圖片,你可以看到更多的細節)。
We consider it positive that insiders have made significant purchases in the last year. Having said that, most people consider earnings and revenue growth trends to be a more meaningful guide to the business. This free report showing analyst forecasts should help you form a view on BOK Financial
我們認爲,內部人士在去年進行了大量收購,這是積極的。話雖如此,大多數人認爲收益和收入增長趨勢是更有意義的業務指南。這份顯示分析師預測的免費報告應該可以幫助您對BOK Financial形成看法
A Different Perspective
不同的視角
While the broader market gained around 16% in the last year, BOK Financial shareholders lost 28% (even including dividends). However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. Unfortunately, last year's performance may indicate unresolved challenges, given that it was worse than the annualised loss of 1.0% over the last half decade. We realise that Baron Rothschild has said investors should "buy when there is blood on the streets", but we caution that investors should first be sure they are buying a high quality business. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand BOK Financial better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for BOK Financial you should be aware of.
儘管去年整個市場上漲了約16%,但BOK Financial的股東損失了28%(甚至包括股息)。但是,請記住,即使是最好的股票有時也會在十二個月內表現不如市場。不幸的是,去年的表現可能預示着尚未解決的挑戰,因爲它比過去五年中1.0%的年化虧損還要糟糕。我們意識到羅斯柴爾德男爵曾說過,投資者應該 “在街頭流血時買入”,但我們警告說,投資者應首先確保他們購買的是高質量的企業。長期追蹤股價表現總是很有意思的。但是,爲了更好地了解BOK Financial,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。一個很好的例子:我們發現了一個你應該注意的BOK Financial警告信號。
BOK Financial is not the only stock insiders are buying. So take a peek at this free list of growing companies with insider buying.
BOK Financial並不是內部人士唯一買入的股票。因此,來看看這份包含內幕買入的成長型公司的免費名單吧。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報率。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。