Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) Earnings and Shareholder Returns Have Been Trending Downwards for the Last Five Years, but the Stock Hikes 11% This Past Week
Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) Earnings and Shareholder Returns Have Been Trending Downwards for the Last Five Years, but the Stock Hikes 11% This Past Week
This week we saw the Dine Brands Global, Inc. (NYSE:DIN) share price climb by 11%. But over the last half decade, the stock has not performed well. After all, the share price is down 42% in that time, significantly under-performing the market.
本週我們看到Dine Brands Global, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:DIN)的股價上漲了11%。但是在過去的五年中,該股表現不佳。畢竟,那段時間股價下跌了42%,表現明顯遜於市場。
While the last five years has been tough for Dine Brands Global shareholders, this past week has shown signs of promise. So let's look at the longer term fundamentals and see if they've been the driver of the negative returns.
儘管過去五年對Dine Brands Global的股東來說是艱難的,但過去一週卻顯示出希望的跡象。因此,讓我們來看看長期基本面,看看它們是否是負回報的驅動力。
See our latest analysis for Dine Brands Global
查看我們對 Dine Brands Global 的最新分析
To quote Buffett, 'Ships will sail around the world but the Flat Earth Society will flourish. There will continue to be wide discrepancies between price and value in the marketplace...' One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.
引用巴菲特的話說:“船隻將在世界各地航行,但Flat Earth Society將蓬勃發展。市場上的價格和價值之間將繼續存在巨大差異...”評估公司情緒變化的一種有缺陷但合理的方法是將每股收益(EPS)與股價進行比較。
Dine Brands Global became profitable within the last five years. That would generally be considered a positive, so we are surprised to see the share price is down. Other metrics might give us a better handle on how its value is changing over time.
在過去的五年中,Dine Brands Global實現了盈利。這通常被認爲是積極的,因此我們驚訝地看到股價下跌。其他指標可能會讓我們更好地了解其價值如何隨着時間的推移而變化。
The most recent dividend was actually lower than it was in the past, so that may have sent the share price lower.
最近的股息實際上低於過去,因此這可能使股價走低。
You can see how earnings and revenue have changed over time in the image below (click on the chart to see the exact values).
您可以在下圖中看到收入和收入隨時間推移而發生的變化(點擊圖表查看確切值)。
It's good to see that there was some significant insider buying in the last three months. That's a positive. On the other hand, we think the revenue and earnings trends are much more meaningful measures of the business. You can see what analysts are predicting for Dine Brands Global in this interactive graph of future profit estimates.
很高興看到在過去三個月中出現了一些大規模的內幕買盤。這是積極的。另一方面,我們認爲收入和收益趨勢是衡量業務的更有意義的指標。在這張未來利潤估計的交互式圖表中,你可以看到分析師對Dine Brands Global的預測。
What About Dividends?
分紅呢?
It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. In the case of Dine Brands Global, it has a TSR of -33% for the last 5 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!
重要的是要考慮任何給定股票的股東總回報率以及股價回報。基於股息再投資的假設,股東總回報率包括任何分拆或貼現資本籌集的價值,以及任何股息。可以公平地說,股東總回報率爲支付股息的股票提供了更完整的畫面。就Dine Brands Global而言,其過去5年的股東總回報率爲-33%。這超過了我們之前提到的股價回報率。這在很大程度上是其股息支付的結果!
A Different Perspective
不同的視角
Investors in Dine Brands Global had a tough year, with a total loss of 27% (including dividends), against a market gain of about 17%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Unfortunately, last year's performance may indicate unresolved challenges, given that it was worse than the annualised loss of 6% over the last half decade. Generally speaking long term share price weakness can be a bad sign, though contrarian investors might want to research the stock in hope of a turnaround. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Dine Brands Global (at least 1 which can't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
Dine Brands Global的投資者經歷了艱難的一年,總虧損了27%(包括股息),而市場漲幅約爲17%。即使是優質股票的股價有時也會下跌,但我們希望看到企業的基本指標有所改善,然後才會變得過於感興趣。不幸的是,去年的表現可能表明挑戰尚未得到解決,因爲這比過去五年來6%的年化虧損還要嚴重。總的來說,長期股價疲軟可能是一個壞兆頭,儘管逆勢投資者可能希望研究該股,希望出現轉機。儘管值得考慮市場狀況可能對股價產生的不同影響,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,以永遠存在的投資風險幽靈爲例。我們已經發現了Dine Brands Global的兩個警告信號(至少有1個不容忽視),了解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。
There are plenty of other companies that have insiders buying up shares. You probably do not want to miss this free list of growing companies that insiders are buying.
還有很多其他公司有內部人士購買股票。你可能不想錯過這份業內人士正在收購的成長型公司的免費名單。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。