Private Companies Are Shanghai Chemspec Corporation's (SHSE:688602) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥374m
Private Companies Are Shanghai Chemspec Corporation's (SHSE:688602) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥374m
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significant control over Shanghai Chemspec by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 55% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- 14% of Shanghai Chemspec is held by Institutions
- 私營公司對上海化學展的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
- 55% 的業務由前三名股東持有
- 上海 Chemspec 14% 的股份由機構持有
A look at the shareholders of Shanghai Chemspec Corporation (SHSE:688602) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 48% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看看上海康博股份有限公司(SHSE: 688602)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有48%所有權的私營公司。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。
As market cap fell to CN¥5.0b last week, private companies would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
隨着上週市值跌至50億元人民幣,私營公司面臨的損失將超過該公司任何其他股東群體。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shanghai Chemspec.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於上海化學展的什麼。
View our latest analysis for Shanghai Chemspec
查看我們對上海 Chemspec 的最新分析
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Chemspec?
關於上海 Chemspec,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shanghai Chemspec. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Shanghai Chemspec's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如你所見,機構投資者在上海Chemspec擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到上海Chemspec的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shanghai Chemspec. Our data shows that Ningbo Meishan Bonded Port Area Ouchang Investment Management Co., Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 35% of shares outstanding. Ningbo Meishan Bonded Port Area Qinou Investment Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and China V Fund Management Co., Ltd. holds about 8.8% of the company stock.
對沖基金在上海化工的股票不多。我們的數據顯示,寧波梅山保稅港區歐昌投資管理有限公司是最大股東,持有35%的已發行股份。寧波梅山保稅港區欽歐投資合夥企業(有限合夥)是第二大股東,擁有11%的普通股,中國V基金管理有限公司持有公司約8.8%的股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前三名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。
Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Chemspec
上海 Chemspec 的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.
我們的數據無法證實董事會成員親自持有股份。並非所有司法管轄區在披露內部所有權方面都有相同的規則,我們有可能在這裏遺漏了一些東西。因此,您可以單擊此處了解有關首席執行官的更多信息。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Shanghai Chemspec. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有上海化工28%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股權所有權
Private equity firms hold a 8.8% stake in Shanghai Chemspec. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
私募股權公司持有上海化工8.8%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 48%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司48%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過單獨的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Shanghai Chemspec (of which 1 is concerning!) you should know about.
儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。比如風險。每家公司都有它們,我們已經發現了上海Chemspec的2個警告標誌(其中1個令人擔憂!)你應該知道。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,來看看這份免費的有趣公司名單吧。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。