share_log

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as MP Materials Corp.'s (NYSE:MP) Recent 11% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as MP Materials Corp.'s (NYSE:MP) Recent 11% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

隨着MP Materials Corp.,機構所有者可能會採取重大行動s(紐約證券交易所代碼:MP)最近下跌11%,增加了一年的虧損
Simply Wall St ·  01/20 07:44

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, MP Materials' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 17 shareholders
  • Insiders own 12% of MP Materials
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,MP Materials的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 51% 的業務由前 17 名股東持有
  • 業內人士擁有 MP 材料 12% 的股份

Every investor in MP Materials Corp. (NYSE:MP) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 51% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

MP Materials Corp.(紐約證券交易所代碼:MP)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲51%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$2.8b last week after a 11% drop in the share price. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 48% for shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell MP Materials which might hurt individual investors.

因此,上週該公司的市值在股價下跌11%後跌至28億美元,因此機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。這組投資者可能特別擔心當前的虧損,這加劇了股東一年的虧損48%。機構通常被稱爲 “市場推動者”,在影響任何股票的價格動態方面擁有強大的力量。因此,如果繼續下跌,機構投資者可能會被迫出售MP Materials,這可能會傷害個人投資者。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about MP Materials.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關MP Materials的哪些信息。

See our latest analysis for MP Materials

查看我們對 MP 材料的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:MP Ownership Breakdown January 20th 2024
紐約證券交易所:國會議員所有權明細 2024年1月20日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MP Materials?

關於MP材料,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常用指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購包含在相關基準指數中的大型公司。

MP Materials already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of MP Materials, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

MP Materials已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下MP Materials過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:MP Earnings and Revenue Growth January 20th 2024
紐約證券交易所:MP 收益和收入增長 2024 年 1 月 20 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in MP Materials. The company's CEO James Litinsky is the largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.5% by the third-largest shareholder.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對MP材料進行有意義的投資。該公司首席執行官詹姆斯·利廷斯基是最大股東,已發行股份的10%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約7.7%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有7.5%的所有權。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 17 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據後發現,前17名股東的總所有權爲51%,這意味着沒有一個股東佔多數。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解公衆輿論也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of MP Materials

MP 材料的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東的關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of MP Materials Corp.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$332m stake in this US$2.8b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有MP Materials Corp合理比例的股份。很有意思的是,內部人士在這項28億美元的業務中擁有3.32億美元的大量股份。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 29% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司29%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 7.7% of MP Materials stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

上市公司目前擁有MP材料公司7.7%的股份。這可能是戰略利益,兩家公司可能有相關的商業利益。可能是他們已經消失了。這一裁定可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand MP Materials better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for MP Materials you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit concerning.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地理解 MP 材質,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。一個很好的例子:我們發現了 2 個你應該注意的 MP 材料警告標誌,其中 1 個有點令人擔憂。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是增長還是萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論