Both Company Controlled Foundation Who Control a Good Portion of Hormel Foods Corporation (NYSE:HRL) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 3.7% Decrease
Both Company Controlled Foundation Who Control a Good Portion of Hormel Foods Corporation (NYSE:HRL) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 3.7% Decrease
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significant control over Hormel Foods by company controlled foundation implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 2 shareholders own 53% of the company
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 公司控制的基金會對荷美爾食品的重大控制意味着公衆有更大的權力影響管理和治理相關決策
- 前2名股東擁有公司53%的股份
- 業內人士最近一直在拋售
Every investor in Hormel Foods Corporation (NYSE:HRL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 47% to be precise, is company controlled foundation. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
荷美爾食品公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:HRL)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有公司股份最多的集團是公司控制的基金會,準確地說約爲47%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
While institutions who own 42% came under pressure after market cap dropped to US$17b last week,company controlled foundation took the most losses.
儘管上週市值跌至170億美元后,持有42%的機構承受了壓力,但公司控制的基金會遭受的損失最大。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hormel Foods, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究荷美爾食品的每種類型的所有者。
View our latest analysis for Hormel Foods
查看我們對荷美爾食品的最新分析
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240122/0-25cddc4371cbb85a30fb40eee171c5be-0-7886d38247fa2986b9f64306169190f3.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hormel Foods?
關於荷美爾食品,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。
We can see that Hormel Foods does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hormel Foods' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到,荷美爾食品確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看荷美爾食品的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240122/0-25cddc4371cbb85a30fb40eee171c5be-1-c74972a4090603e248d5e53deecf8e61.png/big)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Hormel Foods. The company's largest shareholder is The Hormel Foundation, Endowment Arm, with ownership of 47%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.1% by the third-largest shareholder.
對沖基金在荷美爾食品的股票不多。該公司的最大股東是荷美爾基金會捐贈分部,所有權爲47%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約6.4%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有5.1%的所有權。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 53% stake.
對股東登記冊的更詳細研究表明,前兩名股東通過其53%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Hormel Foods
荷美爾食品的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終算在內。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Hormel Foods Corporation. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$52m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有荷美爾食品公司不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部人士擁有該公司的很大一部分股份會令人驚訝。儘管他們的持股量不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共擁有價值5200萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員擁有股票是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Hormel Foods. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有荷美爾食品11%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hormel Foods better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Hormel Foods that you should be aware of before investing here.
擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解荷美爾食品,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了荷美爾食品的一個警告信號,在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這一點。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。