share_log

Investors Three-year Losses Continue as CSC Financial (HKG:6066) Dips a Further 6.8% This Week, Earnings Continue to Decline

Investors Three-year Losses Continue as CSC Financial (HKG:6066) Dips a Further 6.8% This Week, Earnings Continue to Decline

由於CSC Financial(HKG: 6066)本週再下跌6.8%,收益繼續下降,投資者連續三年虧損持續
Simply Wall St ·  01/23 18:18

In order to justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it's worth striving to beat the returns from a market index fund. But in any portfolio, there are likely to be some stocks that fall short of that benchmark. Unfortunately, that's been the case for longer term CSC Financial Co., Ltd. (HKG:6066) shareholders, since the share price is down 52% in the last three years, falling well short of the market decline of around 36%. The more recent news is of little comfort, with the share price down 31% in a year. Furthermore, it's down 19% in about a quarter. That's not much fun for holders. However, one could argue that the price has been influenced by the general market, which is down 9.2% in the same timeframe.

爲了證明選擇個股的努力是合理的,值得努力超過市場指數基金的回報。但是在任何投資組合中,都可能有一些股票未達到該基準。不幸的是,CSC金融有限公司(HKG: 6066)的長期股東就是這種情況,因爲股價在過去三年中下跌了52%,遠低於市場約36%的跌幅。最近的消息並不令人欣慰,股價在一年內下跌了31%。此外,它在大約一個季度內下降了19%。對於持有者來說,這沒什麼好玩的。但是,有人可能會爭辯說,價格受到了總體市場的影響,同期下跌了9.2%。

If the past week is anything to go by, investor sentiment for CSC Financial isn't positive, so let's see if there's a mismatch between fundamentals and the share price.

如果過去一週有意義的話,那麼投資者對CSC Financial的情緒並不樂觀,所以讓我們看看基本面和股價之間是否存在不匹配的情況。

See our latest analysis for CSC Financial

查看我們對CSC Financial的最新分析

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

在他的文章中 格雷厄姆和多茲維爾的超級投資者 禾倫·巴菲特描述了股價如何並不總是合理地反映企業的價值。評估公司情緒變化的一種有缺陷但合理的方法是將每股收益(EPS)與股價進行比較。

CSC Financial saw its EPS decline at a compound rate of 12% per year, over the last three years. The share price decline of 22% is actually steeper than the EPS slippage. So it seems the market was too confident about the business, in the past. This increased caution is also evident in the rather low P/E ratio, which is sitting at 7.06.

在過去三年中,CSC Financial的每股收益以每年12%的複合速度下降。22%的股價下跌實際上比每股收益的下滑幅度更大。因此,過去市場似乎對該業務過於自信。這種更加謹慎的態度也體現在相當低的市盈率上,該比率爲7.06。

The graphic below depicts how EPS has changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).

下圖描述了 EPS 隨着時間的推移是如何變化的(點擊圖片可以看到確切的值)。

earnings-per-share-growth
SEHK:6066 Earnings Per Share Growth January 23rd 2024
SEHK: 6066 每股收益增長 2024 年 1 月 23 日

We're pleased to report that the CEO is remunerated more modestly than most CEOs at similarly capitalized companies. It's always worth keeping an eye on CEO pay, but a more important question is whether the company will grow earnings throughout the years. Dive deeper into the earnings by checking this interactive graph of CSC Financial's earnings, revenue and cash flow.

我們很高興地向大家報告,首席執行官的薪酬比資本相似公司的大多數首席執行官要低得多。始終值得關注首席執行官的薪酬,但更重要的問題是公司多年來是否會增加收益。查看這張CSC Financial收益、收入和現金流的交互式圖表,深入了解收益。

What About Dividends?

分紅呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. In the case of CSC Financial, it has a TSR of -45% for the last 3 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.

在考慮投資回報時,重要的是要考慮兩者之間的區別 股東總回報 (TSR) 和 股價回報。股東總回報率是一種回報計算方法,它考慮了現金分紅的價值(假設收到的任何股息都經過再投資)以及任何貼現資本籌集和分拆的計算價值。可以說,股東總回報率更全面地描述了股票產生的回報。就CSC Financial而言,其在過去三年的股東回報率爲-45%。這超過了我們之前提到的其股價回報率。因此,該公司支付的股息提高了 股東回報。

A Different Perspective

不同的視角

While the broader market lost about 23% in the twelve months, CSC Financial shareholders did even worse, losing 28% (even including dividends). Having said that, it's inevitable that some stocks will be oversold in a falling market. The key is to keep your eyes on the fundamental developments. Longer term investors wouldn't be so upset, since they would have made 5%, each year, over five years. If the fundamental data continues to indicate long term sustainable growth, the current sell-off could be an opportunity worth considering. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand CSC Financial better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with CSC Financial (including 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) .

儘管整個市場在十二個月中下跌了約23%,但CSC Financial的股東表現更糟,損失了28%(甚至包括股息)。話雖如此,在下跌的市場中,一些股票不可避免地會被超賣。關鍵是要密切關注基本發展。長期投資者不會那麼沮喪,因爲他們本可以在五年內每年賺5%。如果基本面數據繼續顯示長期可持續增長,那麼當前的拋售可能是一個值得考慮的機會。長期跟蹤股價表現總是很有意思的。但是,爲了更好地了解CSC Financial,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,你應該了解我們在CSC Financial中發現的兩個警告信號(包括一個讓我們有點不舒服的警告信號)。

If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of companies that have proven they can grow earnings.

如果你想看看另一家公司——一家財務狀況可能優異的公司——那麼千萬不要錯過這份已經證明自己可以增加收益的公司的免費名單。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Hong Kong exchanges.

請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在香港交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論