Is MMG Limited's (HKG:1208) ROE Of 3.1% Concerning?
Is MMG Limited's (HKG:1208) ROE Of 3.1% Concerning?
One of the best investments we can make is in our own knowledge and skill set. With that in mind, this article will work through how we can use Return On Equity (ROE) to better understand a business. To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand MMG Limited (HKG:1208).
我們能做的最好的投資之一是我們自己的知識和技能。考慮到這一點,本文將探討如何使用股本回報率(ROE)來更好地了解業務。爲了使課程以實用爲基礎,我們將使用投資回報率來更好地了解MMG Limited(HKG: 1208)。
ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. In short, ROE shows the profit each dollar generates with respect to its shareholder investments.
投資回報率或股本回報率是評估公司如何有效地從股東那裏獲得投資回報的有用工具。簡而言之,投資回報率顯示了每美元從其股東投資中產生的利潤。
View our latest analysis for MMG
查看我們對MMG的最新分析
How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?
你如何計算股本回報率?
The formula for ROE is:
ROE 的公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股本回報率 = 淨利潤(來自持續經營業務)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for MMG is:
因此,根據上述公式,MMG的投資回報率爲:
3.1% = US$129m ÷ US$4.2b (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2023).
3.1% = 1.29億美元 ÷ 42億美元(基於截至2023年6月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. Another way to think of that is that for every HK$1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn HK$0.03 in profit.
“回報” 是過去十二個月的稅後收入。另一種思考方式是,每持有價值1港元的股權,該公司就能獲得0.03港元的利潤。
Does MMG Have A Good ROE?
MMG 的投資回報率不錯嗎?
By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. However, this method is only useful as a rough check, because companies do differ quite a bit within the same industry classification. If you look at the image below, you can see MMG has a lower ROE than the average (8.9%) in the Metals and Mining industry classification.
通過將公司的投資回報率與其行業平均水平進行比較,我們可以快速衡量其表現如何。但是,這種方法僅在粗略檢查時有用,因爲各公司在相同的行業分類中確實存在很大差異。如果你看下圖,你會發現MMG的投資回報率低於金屬和採礦行業分類中的平均水平(8.9%)。
That certainly isn't ideal. However, a low ROE is not always bad. If the company's debt levels are moderate to low, then there's still a chance that returns can be improved via the use of financial leverage. A company with high debt levels and low ROE is a combination we like to avoid given the risk involved. Our risks dashboard should have the 2 risks we have identified for MMG.
這當然不理想。但是,低投資回報率並不總是壞事。如果公司的債務水平處於中等至低水平,那麼仍然有可能通過使用財務槓桿來提高回報。鑑於所涉及的風險,高債務水平和低投資回報率的公司是我們希望避免的組合。我們的風險儀表板應包含我們爲MMG確定的兩種風險。
How Does Debt Impact Return On Equity?
債務如何影響股本回報率?
Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the first two cases, the ROE will capture this use of capital to grow. In the latter case, the use of debt will improve the returns, but will not change the equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking.
大多數公司需要來自某個地方的資金來增加利潤。這些現金可能來自發行股票、留存收益或債務。在前兩個案例中,投資回報率將利用這種資本來增長。在後一種情況下,使用債務將提高回報,但不會改變權益。因此,使用債務可以提高投資回報率,儘管比喻地說,暴風雨天氣會帶來額外的風險。
Combining MMG's Debt And Its 3.1% Return On Equity
合併MMG的債務及其3.1%的股本回報率
It's worth noting the high use of debt by MMG, leading to its debt to equity ratio of 1.33. Its ROE is quite low, even with the use of significant debt; that's not a good result, in our opinion. Debt does bring extra risk, so it's only really worthwhile when a company generates some decent returns from it.
值得注意的是,MMG大量使用債務,導致其負債權益比率爲1.33。即使使用了巨額債務,其投資回報率也相當低;在我們看來,這不是一個好結果。債務確實會帶來額外的風險,因此只有當公司從中獲得可觀的回報時,債務才是真正值得的。
Conclusion
結論
Return on equity is a useful indicator of the ability of a business to generate profits and return them to shareholders. A company that can achieve a high return on equity without debt could be considered a high quality business. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.
股本回報率是衡量企業創造利潤並將其返還給股東的能力的有用指標。能夠在沒有債務的情況下實現高股本回報率的公司可以被視爲高質量的企業。如果兩家公司的債務與股權比率大致相同,而一家公司的投資回報率更高,那麼我通常更喜歡投資回報率更高的那家公司。
But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. Profit growth rates, versus the expectations reflected in the price of the stock, are a particularly important to consider. So you might want to take a peek at this data-rich interactive graph of forecasts for the company.
但是,當企業質量很高時,市場通常會以反映這一點的價格出價。與股票價格所反映的預期相比,利潤增長率尤其值得考慮。因此,你可能想看看這張數據豐富的公司預測交互式圖表。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.
如果你更願意去另一家公司——一家財務狀況可能優越的公司——那麼千萬不要錯過這份免費的股本回報率高、債務低的有趣公司的名單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。