Nanjing Securities Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:601990) Largest Shareholders Are Private Companies With 46% Ownership, Individual Investors Own 40%
Nanjing Securities Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:601990) Largest Shareholders Are Private Companies With 46% Ownership, Individual Investors Own 40%
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significant control over Nanjing Securities by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 私營公司對南京證券的重大控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
- 51% 的業務由前 7 名股東持有
- 公司過去的表現以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有一個很好的了解
A look at the shareholders of Nanjing Securities Co., Ltd. (SHSE:601990) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 46% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看南京證券股份有限公司(SHSE: 601990)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,私營公司擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲46%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
Meanwhile, individual investors make up 40% of the company's shareholders.
同時,個人投資者佔公司股東的40%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Nanjing Securities.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於南京證券的什麼。
View our latest analysis for Nanjing Securities
查看我們對南京證券的最新分析
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nanjing Securities?
關於南京證券,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Nanjing Securities. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Nanjing Securities' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如你所見,機構投資者在南京證券擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到南京證券的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Nanjing Securities. The company's largest shareholder is Nanjing Zijin Investment Group Co., Ltd., with ownership of 25%. Nanjing Communications Construction & Investment Holdings(Group)Company Limited is the second largest shareholder owning 7.8% of common stock, and Nanjing New Industrial Investment Group Co.,Ltd. holds about 7.0% of the company stock.
對沖基金在南京證券的股份不多。公司的最大股東是南京紫金投資集團有限公司,持股25%。南京交通建設投資控股(集團)有限公司是第二大股東,擁有7.8%的普通股,南京新產業投資集團有限公司。, Ltd. 持有公司約7.0%的股份。
We also observed that the top 7 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前7名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。我們目前沒有收到分析師對該股的任何報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Nanjing Securities
南京證券的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。
Our information suggests that Nanjing Securities Co., Ltd. insiders own under 1% of the company. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own CN¥2.3k worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息表明,南京證券股份有限公司內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。但是,內部人士有可能通過更復雜的結構獲得間接利益。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值2.3萬元人民幣的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。您可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 40% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司40%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 46%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們可以看到,私營公司擁有已發行股份的46%。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私營公司對上市公司的股票感興趣。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 5.4% of the Nanjing Securities shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
我們可以看到,上市公司持有南京證券發行股份的5.4%。這可能是戰略利益,兩家公司可能有相關的商業利益。可能是他們已經消失了。這一裁定可能值得進一步調查。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Nanjing Securities (at least 1 which is a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經在南京證券發現了兩個警告信號(至少有一個有點不愉快),了解它們應該是你投資過程的一部分。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果你更願意去另一家公司看看,一家財務狀況可能更好,那麼千萬不要錯過這份由強勁財務數據支持的有趣公司的免費名單。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。