These Return Metrics Don't Make IPG Photonics (NASDAQ:IPGP) Look Too Strong
These Return Metrics Don't Make IPG Photonics (NASDAQ:IPGP) Look Too Strong
If we're looking to avoid a business that is in decline, what are the trends that can warn us ahead of time? A business that's potentially in decline often shows two trends, a return on capital employed (ROCE) that's declining, and a base of capital employed that's also declining. This combination can tell you that not only is the company investing less, it's earning less on what it does invest. And from a first read, things don't look too good at IPG Photonics (NASDAQ:IPGP), so let's see why.
如果我們想避開一家衰退的企業,有哪些趨勢可以提前警告我們?可能陷入衰退的企業通常表現出兩種趨勢,a 返回 關於資本使用率(ROCE)正在下降,而且 基礎 使用的資本也在下降。這種組合可以告訴你,公司不僅減少了投資,而且投資的收益也減少了。從第一次讀起,IPG Photonics(納斯達克股票代碼:IPGP)的情況看起來並不太好,所以讓我們看看原因。
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
資本使用回報率(ROCE):這是什麼?
For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. To calculate this metric for IPG Photonics, this is the formula:
對於那些不知道的人來說,ROCE是衡量公司年度稅前利潤(其回報率)的指標,相對於該業務使用的資本。要計算 IPG Photonics 的這個指標,公式如下:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
已動用資本回報率 = 息稅前收益 (EBIT) ¥(總資產-流動負債)
0.076 = US$185m ÷ (US$2.7b - US$220m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2023).
0.076 = 1.85億美元 ÷(27億美元-2.2億美元) (基於截至2023年9月的過去十二個月)。
Thus, IPG Photonics has an ROCE of 7.6%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Electronic industry average of 12%.
因此,IPG Photonics的投資回報率爲7.6%。歸根結底,這是一個低迴報,其表現低於電子行業12%的平均水平。
See our latest analysis for IPG Photonics
查看我們對 IPG Photonics 的最新分析
In the above chart we have measured IPG Photonics' prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering IPG Photonics here for free.
在上圖中,我們將IPG Photonics先前的投資回報率與之前的表現進行了比較,但可以說,未來更爲重要。如果你願意,可以在這裏免費查看報道IPG Photonics的分析師的預測。
What The Trend Of ROCE Can Tell Us
ROCE 的趨勢能告訴我們什麼
There is reason to be cautious about IPG Photonics, given the returns are trending downwards. About five years ago, returns on capital were 24%, however they're now substantially lower than that as we saw above. And on the capital employed front, the business is utilizing roughly the same amount of capital as it was back then. Companies that exhibit these attributes tend to not be shrinking, but they can be mature and facing pressure on their margins from competition. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on IPG Photonics becoming one if things continue as they have.
鑑於回報率呈下降趨勢,有理由對IPG Photonics持謹慎態度。大約五年前,資本回報率爲24%,但現在已大大低於我們在上面看到的水平。在資本使用方面,該企業使用的資本量與當時大致相同。表現出這些屬性的公司往往不會萎縮,但它們可能已經成熟,面臨競爭對利潤的壓力。因此,由於這些趨勢通常不利於創造多袋機,因此,如果情況繼續保持現狀,我們就不會屏住呼吸希望IPG Photonics成爲多袋機。
The Bottom Line On IPG Photonics' ROCE
IPG Photonics 投資回報率的底線
In summary, it's unfortunate that IPG Photonics is generating lower returns from the same amount of capital. Long term shareholders who've owned the stock over the last five years have experienced a 24% depreciation in their investment, so it appears the market might not like these trends either. That being the case, unless the underlying trends revert to a more positive trajectory, we'd consider looking elsewhere.
總而言之,不幸的是,IPG Photonics從相同數量的資本中獲得的回報較低。在過去五年中持有該股的長期股東的投資貶值了24%,因此看來市場可能也不喜歡這些趨勢。既然如此,除非潛在趨勢恢復到更積極的軌跡,否則我們會考慮將目光投向其他地方。
Like most companies, IPG Photonics does come with some risks, and we've found 2 warning signs that you should be aware of.
像大多數公司一樣,IPG Photonics確實存在一些風險,我們發現了兩個你應該注意的警告信號。
While IPG Photonics may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.
儘管IPG Photonics目前可能無法獲得最高的回報,但我們編制了一份目前股本回報率超過25%的公司名單。在這裏查看這個免費清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。