share_log

Should You Be Worried About Archrock, Inc.'s (NYSE:AROC) 9.6% Return On Equity?

Should You Be Worried About Archrock, Inc.'s (NYSE:AROC) 9.6% Return On Equity?

你是否應該擔心 Archrock, Inc.s(紐約證券交易所代碼:AROC)9.6% 的股本回報率?
Simply Wall St ·  01/27 08:22

Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand Archrock, Inc. (NYSE:AROC).

許多投資者仍在學習分析股票時可能有用的各種指標。本文適用於那些想了解股本回報率(ROE)的人。爲了使課程以實用爲基礎,我們將使用投資回報率來更好地了解Archrock, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:AROC)。

Return on Equity or ROE is a test of how effectively a company is growing its value and managing investors' money. Simply put, it is used to assess the profitability of a company in relation to its equity capital.

股本回報率或投資回報率是對公司增值和管理投資者資金的有效性的考驗。簡而言之,它用於評估公司相對於其股權資本的盈利能力。

View our latest analysis for Archrock

查看我們對 Archrock 的最新分析

How Is ROE Calculated?

ROE 是如何計算的?

The formula for return on equity is:

股本回報率的公式是:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

股本回報率 = 淨利潤(來自持續經營業務)÷ 股東權益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Archrock is:

因此,根據上述公式,Archrock的投資回報率爲:

9.6% = US$82m ÷ US$861m (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2023).

9.6% = 8200萬美元 ÷ 8.61億美元(基於截至2023年9月的過去十二個月)。

The 'return' is the yearly profit. Another way to think of that is that for every $1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn $0.10 in profit.

“回報” 是每年的利潤。另一種思考方式是,每持有價值1美元的股權,該公司就能獲得0.10美元的利潤。

Does Archrock Have A Good ROE?

Archrock 的投資回報率不錯嗎?

By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. As shown in the graphic below, Archrock has a lower ROE than the average (12%) in the Energy Services industry classification.

通過將公司的投資回報率與其行業平均水平進行比較,我們可以快速衡量其表現如何。這種方法的侷限性在於,有些公司與其他公司有很大不同,即使在相同的行業分類中也是如此。如下圖所示,Archrock的投資回報率低於能源服務行業分類中的平均水平(12%)。

roe
NYSE:AROC Return on Equity January 27th 2024
紐約證券交易所:AROC 股本回報率 2024 年 1 月 27 日

That's not what we like to see. Although, we think that a lower ROE could still mean that a company has the opportunity to better its returns with the use of leverage, provided its existing debt levels are low. A high debt company having a low ROE is a different story altogether and a risky investment in our books. To know the 3 risks we have identified for Archrock visit our risks dashboard for free.

這不是我們喜歡看到的。但是,我們認爲,只要現有債務水平較低,較低的投資回報率仍可能意味着公司有機會通過使用槓桿提高回報。投資回報率低的高負債公司完全是另一回事,對我們的賬面來說也是一項風險投資。要了解我們爲Archrock確定的三種風險,請免費訪問我們的風險控制面板。

How Does Debt Impact ROE?

債務如何影響投資回報率?

Virtually all companies need money to invest in the business, to grow profits. That cash can come from retained earnings, issuing new shares (equity), or debt. In the first two cases, the ROE will capture this use of capital to grow. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking.

幾乎所有公司都需要資金來投資業務,增加利潤。這些現金可以來自留存收益、發行新股(股權)或債務。在前兩個案例中,投資回報率將涵蓋這種資本用於增長的用途。在後一種情況下,用於增長的債務將提高回報,但不會影響總資產。因此,使用債務可以提高投資回報率,儘管可以隱喻地說,暴風雨天氣會帶來額外的風險。

Archrock's Debt And Its 9.6% ROE

Archrock 的債務及其9.6%的投資回報率

Archrock clearly uses a high amount of debt to boost returns, as it has a debt to equity ratio of 1.86. With a fairly low ROE, and significant use of debt, it's hard to get excited about this business at the moment. Debt does bring extra risk, so it's only really worthwhile when a company generates some decent returns from it.

Archrock顯然使用大量債務來提高回報,因爲其債務與權益比率爲1.86。由於投資回報率相當低,而且債務使用量很大,目前很難對這項業務感到興奮。債務確實會帶來額外的風險,因此只有當公司從中獲得可觀的回報時,債務才是真正值得的。

Conclusion

結論

Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. A company that can achieve a high return on equity without debt could be considered a high quality business. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.

股本回報率是我們可以比較不同公司的業務質量的一種方式。能夠在沒有債務的情況下實現高股本回報率的公司可以被視爲高質量的企業。如果兩家公司的債務與股權比率大致相同,而一家公司的投資回報率更高,那麼我通常更喜歡投資回報率更高的那家公司。

Having said that, while ROE is a useful indicator of business quality, you'll have to look at a whole range of factors to determine the right price to buy a stock. Profit growth rates, versus the expectations reflected in the price of the stock, are a particularly important to consider. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

話雖如此,儘管投資回報率是衡量業務質量的有用指標,但您必須考慮一系列因素才能確定購買股票的正確價格。與股票價格所反映的預期相比,利潤增長率尤其需要考慮。因此,我認爲可能值得查看這份關於分析師對公司的預測的免費報告。

Of course Archrock may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of other companies that have high ROE and low debt.

當然,Archrock可能不是最好的買入股票。因此,您不妨免費查看其他投資回報率高、負債率低的公司的名單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論