Returns On Capital At Ecolab (NYSE:ECL) Have Stalled
Returns On Capital At Ecolab (NYSE:ECL) Have Stalled
What trends should we look for it we want to identify stocks that can multiply in value over the long term? Amongst other things, we'll want to see two things; firstly, a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an expansion in the company's amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. Although, when we looked at Ecolab (NYSE:ECL), it didn't seem to tick all of these boxes.
我們應該尋找哪些趨勢?我們想確定可以長期價值成倍增長的股票?除其他外,我們希望看到兩件事;首先,成長 返回 論資本使用率(ROCE),其次是公司的擴張 金額 所用資本的比例。如果你看到這一點,這通常意味着它是一家擁有良好商業模式和大量盈利再投資機會的公司。但是,當我們查看Ecolab(紐約證券交易所代碼:ECL)時,它似乎並沒有勾選所有這些方框。
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
資本使用回報率(ROCE):這是什麼?
Just to clarify if you're unsure, ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. To calculate this metric for Ecolab, this is the formula:
爲了澄清一下你是否不確定,ROCE是評估公司從投資於其業務的資本中獲得多少稅前收入(按百分比計算)的指標。要計算 Ecolab 的這個指標,公式如下:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
已動用資本回報率 = 息稅前收益 (EBIT) ¥(總資產-流動負債)
0.12 = US$2.1b ÷ (US$22b - US$4.6b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2023).
0.12 = 21億美元 ÷(220億美元-46億美元) (基於截至2023年9月的過去十二個月)。
Thus, Ecolab has an ROCE of 12%. That's a relatively normal return on capital, and it's around the 10% generated by the Chemicals industry.
因此,Ecolab的投資回報率爲12%。這是相對正常的資本回報率,大約是化工行業產生的10%。
In the above chart we have measured Ecolab's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
在上圖中,我們將Ecolab先前的投資回報率與之前的表現進行了比較,但可以說,未來更爲重要。如果您有興趣,可以在我們關於公司分析師預測的免費報告中查看分析師的預測。
What Does the ROCE Trend For Ecolab Tell Us?
Ecolab的投資回報率趨勢告訴我們什麼?
Things have been pretty stable at Ecolab, with its capital employed and returns on that capital staying somewhat the same for the last five years. Businesses with these traits tend to be mature and steady operations because they're past the growth phase. So unless we see a substantial change at Ecolab in terms of ROCE and additional investments being made, we wouldn't hold our breath on it being a multi-bagger. This probably explains why Ecolab is paying out 32% of its income to shareholders in the form of dividends. Unless businesses have highly compelling growth opportunities, they'll typically return some money to shareholders.
Ecolab的情況一直相當穩定,在過去五年中,其資本使用率和資本回報率基本保持不變。具有這些特徵的企業往往是成熟而穩定的運營,因爲它們已經過了增長階段。因此,除非我們看到Ecolab在投資回報率方面發生重大變化並進行額外投資,否則我們不會屏住呼吸成爲一家多袋公司。這也許可以解釋爲什麼Ecolab以股息的形式將其收入的32%支付給股東。除非企業有極具吸引力的增長機會,否則他們通常會向股東返還一些錢。
What We Can Learn From Ecolab's ROCE
我們可以從 Ecolab 的 ROCE 中學到什麼
In summary, Ecolab isn't compounding its earnings but is generating stable returns on the same amount of capital employed. And with the stock having returned a mere 32% in the last five years to shareholders, you could argue that they're aware of these lackluster trends. So if you're looking for a multi-bagger, the underlying trends indicate you may have better chances elsewhere.
總而言之,Ecolab並沒有複合收益,而是在使用相同數量的資本的情況下產生了穩定的回報。而且,由於該股在過去五年中僅向股東回報了32%,因此你可以說他們意識到了這些乏善可陳的趨勢。因此,如果你正在尋找一款多袋裝車,潛在的趨勢表明你在其他地方的機會可能更大。
One more thing, we've spotted 2 warning signs facing Ecolab that you might find interesting.
還有一件事,我們發現了面向 Ecolab 的 2 個警告標誌,你可能會覺得有趣。
While Ecolab isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.
儘管Ecolab的回報率並不高,但請查看這份免費清單,列出了資產負債表穩健的股本回報率高的公司。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。