share_log

Capital Allocation Trends At Nanjing Port (SZSE:002040) Aren't Ideal

Capital Allocation Trends At Nanjing Port (SZSE:002040) Aren't Ideal

南京港(SZSE:002040)的資本配置趨勢並不理想
Simply Wall St ·  02/03 21:15

If we're looking to avoid a business that is in decline, what are the trends that can warn us ahead of time? More often than not, we'll see a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) and a declining amount of capital employed. This indicates the company is producing less profit from its investments and its total assets are decreasing. In light of that, from a first glance at Nanjing Port (SZSE:002040), we've spotted some signs that it could be struggling, so let's investigate.

如果我們想避開一家正在衰落的企業,那麼有哪些趨勢可以提前警告我們?通常,我們會看到下降 返回 論資本使用率(ROCE)和下降情況 金額 所用資本的比例。這表明該公司的投資利潤減少了,總資產也在減少。有鑑於此,乍一看南京港(SZSE:002040),我們發現了一些可能陷入困境的跡象,所以讓我們來調查一下。

Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)

了解資本使用回報率 (ROCE)

If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. The formula for this calculation on Nanjing Port is:

如果你以前沒有與ROCE合作過,它會衡量公司從其業務中使用的資本中產生的 “回報”(稅前利潤)。南京港的計算公式爲:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

已動用資本回報率 = 息稅前收益 (EBIT) ¥(總資產-流動負債)

0.044 = CN¥190m ÷ (CN¥4.9b - CN¥584m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2023).

0.044 = 1.9億元人民幣 ÷(49億元人民幣-5.84億元人民幣) (基於截至2023年9月的過去十二個月)

So, Nanjing Port has an ROCE of 4.4%. On its own, that's a low figure but it's around the 5.2% average generated by the Infrastructure industry.

因此,南京港的投資回報率爲4.4%。就其本身而言,這是一個很低的數字,但約爲基礎設施行業產生的5.2%的平均水平。

roce
SZSE:002040 Return on Capital Employed February 4th 2024
SZSE: 002040 2024 年 2 月 4 日動用資本回報率

While the past is not representative of the future, it can be helpful to know how a company has performed historically, which is why we have this chart above. If you want to delve into the historical earnings, revenue and cash flow of Nanjing Port, check out these free graphs here.

雖然過去並不能代表未來,但了解一家公司的歷史表現可能會有所幫助,這就是我們上面有這張圖表的原因。如果您想深入了解南京港的歷史收益、收入和現金流,請在此處查看這些免費圖表。

What Can We Tell From Nanjing Port's ROCE Trend?

我們可以從南京港的ROCE趨勢中得出什麼?

In terms of Nanjing Port's historical ROCE movements, the trend doesn't inspire confidence. Unfortunately the returns on capital have diminished from the 5.9% that they were earning five years ago. Meanwhile, capital employed in the business has stayed roughly the flat over the period. Companies that exhibit these attributes tend to not be shrinking, but they can be mature and facing pressure on their margins from competition. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on Nanjing Port becoming one if things continue as they have.

就南京港的歷史ROCE走勢而言,這種趨勢並不能激發信心。不幸的是,資本回報率已從五年前的5.9%有所下降。同時,在此期間,該業務使用的資本基本保持不變。表現出這些屬性的公司往往不會萎縮,但它們可能已經成熟,面臨競爭對利潤的壓力。因此,由於這些趨勢通常不利於創建多袋貨船,如果情況照原樣下去,我們就不會屏住呼吸等待南京港成爲一個裝袋機。

What We Can Learn From Nanjing Port's ROCE

我們可以從南京港的投資回報率中學到什麼

In summary, it's unfortunate that Nanjing Port is generating lower returns from the same amount of capital. Despite the concerning underlying trends, the stock has actually gained 2.0% over the last five years, so it might be that the investors are expecting the trends to reverse. Either way, we aren't huge fans of the current trends and so with that we think you might find better investments elsewhere.

總而言之,不幸的是,南京港從相同數量的資本中獲得的回報較低。儘管潛在趨勢令人擔憂,但該股在過去五年中實際上上漲了2.0%,因此投資者可能預計趨勢將逆轉。無論哪種方式,我們都不是當前趨勢的忠實擁護者,因此我們認爲您可能會在其他地方找到更好的投資。

One final note, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Nanjing Port (including 1 which is concerning) .

最後一點是,你應該了解一下我們在南京港發現的兩個警告標誌(包括一個令人擔憂的標誌)。

For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.

對於那些喜歡投資穩健公司的人,可以查看這份資產負債表穩健和股本回報率高的公司的免費清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論