share_log

Cassava Sciences, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SAVA) 7.1% Loss Last Week Hit Both Individual Investors Who Own 59% as Well as Institutions

Cassava Sciences, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SAVA) 7.1% Loss Last Week Hit Both Individual Investors Who Own 59% as Well as Institutions

木薯科學有限公司”s(納斯達克股票代碼:SAVA)上週虧損7.1%,既打擊了持有59%的個人投資者,也打擊了機構
Simply Wall St ·  02/06 05:29

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by retail investors in Cassava Sciences indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 36% ownership
  • 31% of Cassava Sciences is held by Institutions
  • 散戶投資者對木薯科學的大量所有權表明,他們在管理和業務戰略方面集體擁有更大的發言權
  • 共有25名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲36%
  • 31% 的木薯科學由機構持有

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Cassava Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:SAVA), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 59% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了木薯科學公司(納斯達克股票代碼:SAVA),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,散戶投資者擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲59%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

While institutions, who own 31% shares weren't spared from last week's US$73m market cap drop, retail investors as a group suffered the maximum losses

儘管擁有31%股票的機構未能倖免於上週7300萬美元的市值下跌,但散戶投資者作爲一個整體遭受的損失最大

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Cassava Sciences.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於木薯科學的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:SAVA Ownership Breakdown February 6th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:SAVA 所有權明細 2024 年 2 月 6 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cassava Sciences?

關於木薯科學,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that Cassava Sciences does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Cassava Sciences' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,木薯科學確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到木薯科學的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:SAVA Earnings and Revenue Growth February 6th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:SAVA 收益和收入增長 2024 年 2 月 6 日

Cassava Sciences is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 7.2%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.9% and 5.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Remi Barbier, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

木薯科學不歸對沖基金所有。該公司的最大股東是貝萊德公司,所有權爲7.2%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的5.9%和5.4%。第二大股東雷米·巴比爾也恰好擁有首席執行官的頭銜。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

深入研究我們的所有權數據表明,前25名股東總共持有不到登記冊的一半,這表明一大批小股東沒有單一股東佔多數。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有一些分析師對這隻股票的報道,但隨着時間的推移,它仍可能變得更加廣爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Cassava Sciences

木薯科學的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Cassava Sciences, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$89m worth of the US$968m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有木薯科學公司的股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有這家價值9.68億美元的公司的價值8900萬美元。很高興看到內部人士進行一些投資,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 59% of Cassava Sciences. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有木薯科學公司59%的股份。有了這麼多的所有權,散戶投資者可以在影響股東回報的決策中共同發揮作用,例如股息政策和董事任命。他們還可以行使權力,對可能不會提高盈利能力的收購或合併進行投票。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Cassava Sciences better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Cassava Sciences (1 doesn't sit too well with us!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解木薯科學,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了木薯科學的 2 個警告信號(1 個對我們來說不太合適!)在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這一點。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論