share_log

Banyan Gold Announces Positive Metallurgical Test Results, AurMac Project, Mayo, Yukon

Banyan Gold Announces Positive Metallurgical Test Results, AurMac Project, Mayo, Yukon

悅榕金業公佈育空地區梅奧AurMac項目的冶金測試結果呈陽性
Accesswire ·  02/06 06:00

VANCOUVER, BC / ACCESSWIRE / February 6, 2024 / Banyan Gold Corp. (the "Company" or "Banyan") (TSXV:BYN)(OTCQB:BYAGF) is pleased to announce positive results from the Phase 1 metallurgical test program conducted on the Company's AurMac Project in the Yukon Territory. Phase 1 metallurgical testing focused on the AurMac Project's Powerline Deposit ("Powerline") as Powerline hosts the majority of the Project's 6.2 million ounce ("Moz") gold inferred Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE"). Results from the metallurgical test program demonstrate robust recoveries throughout Powerline, identifying multiple conventional mineral processing flow sheets which the Company continues to advance and optimize through ongoing metallurgical test work.

不列顛哥倫比亞省溫哥華/ACCESSWIRE/2024年2月6日/悅榕黃金公司(“公司” 或 “悅榕集團”)(多倫多證券交易所股票代碼:BYN)(OTCQB: BYAGF)欣然宣佈在育空地區對該公司AurMac項目進行的第一階段冶金測試項目取得了積極成果。第一階段的冶金測試側重於AurMac項目的電力線礦牀(“電力線”),因爲電力線是該項目620萬盎司(“Moz”)黃金推斷礦產資源估算(“MRE”)中的大部分。冶金測試項目的結果表明,整個Powerline的回收率很高,確定了多個傳統的礦物加工流程,公司通過正在進行的冶金測試工作繼續推進和優化這些流程。

Highlights :

亮點:

  • Gold recoveries averaged 91% from 75 micron ("um") (200 Mesh) bottle roll cyanidation tests.
  • Gold recoveries estimated to be 91% for the Carbon in Leach ("CIL")/Carbon in Pulp ("CIP") process.
  • Gold recoveries for the combined gravity and flotation process are estimated at 84%.
  • Heap leach gold recovery is estimated to range from 64-72% based on coarse size (9.5 mm) bottle roll testing, conventional column leach tests and Vat leach diffusion extraction testing.
  • Flotation recovery into a rougher concentrate recovered on average 89% of the gold with a low mass pull of 3.7%, indicative that a small percentage of material would require further processing.
  • Low cyanide consumption at an average of 0.52 kg/mt for primary grind of P80 passing 75 um.
  • Gravity recovery has shown it may be an effective part of the flow sheet.
  • Low sulphide concentration and excess buffering capacity indicates Powerline is non-acid generating.
  • 75微米(“嗯”)(200 目)瓶卷氰化測試的黃金回收率平均爲91%。
  • 據估計,浸出中的碳(“CIL”)/紙漿中的碳(“CIP”)工藝的黃金回收率爲91%。
  • 重力和浮選聯合過程的黃金回收率估計爲84%。
  • 根據粗糙尺寸(9.5 mm)的瓶輥測試、傳統的柱浸測試和大桶浸出擴散提取測試,堆浸金的回收率估計在 64-72% 之間。
  • 浮選回收成更粗糙的精礦平均回收了89%的黃金,低質量拉力爲3.7%,這表明一小部分材料需要進一步加工。
  • P 初級研磨的氰化物消耗量低,平均爲 0.52 kg/mt80 通過了 75 um。
  • 重力回收表明,它可能是流程表的有效組成部分。
  • 硫化物濃度低和緩衝能力過大表明 Powerline 不產生酸。

"Metallurgical test work highlights robust gold recoveries with multiple conventional mineral processing flow sheets and further optimization has a high likelihood to result in increased overall gold recoveries," Tara Christie, President & CEO, stated. "These results represent a significant step forward at AurMac and continued work will focus on crush and grind sizes, in addition to power and reagent consumption. Work will be focused to support a future economic study using one or more of the identified processes."

總裁兼首席執行官塔拉·克里斯蒂表示:“冶金測試工作凸顯了多種傳統礦物加工流程表的強勁黃金回收率,進一步的優化很可能會提高整體黃金回收率。”“這些結果代表了AurMac向前邁出的重要一步,除了功率和試劑消耗外,將繼續研究粉碎和研磨規模。工作重點將是使用一個或多個已確定的流程支持未來的經濟研究。”

Potential Mineral Processing Flow Sheets

潛在的礦物加工流程表

Three gold recovery process flow sheets have been identified through the Phase 1 test program. This includes CIL or CIP gold extraction processes (91% gold recovery). The CIL/CIP flow sheet is the most commonly used milling gold recovery method worldwide. Canadian examples include Agnico Eagle's Detour Lake and Malartic Mines in Ontario and Quebec, respectively. The second process is conventional mill flotation (84% gold recovery) which is used at Kinross Gold's Paracatu Mine in Brazil and Centamin's Sukari Mine in Egypt. Test work supportive of gravity recoverable gold was also carried out that indicates a gravity recovery circuit could be included in either the CIL/CIP or mill flotation flow sheets to enhance gold recoveries and reduce reagent consumption. The third flow sheet is heap leach processing (64-72% gold recovery), a commonly used method for high volume, low-grade gold deposits; examples include Victoria Gold's nearby Eagle Mine in the Yukon and Kinross Gold's Fort Knox Mine in Alaska. Mines such as Fort Knox utilize both heap leaching and conventional mill processing.

通過第一階段測試計劃,已經確定了三份黃金回收工藝流程表。這包括CIL或CIP黃金開採過程(黃金回收率爲91%)。CIL/CIP 流程表是全球最常用的磨金回收方法。加拿大的例子分別包括安大略省和魁北克省的 Agnico Eagle 的 Detour Lake 和 Malartic Mines。第二種工藝是傳統的磨機浮選(黃金回收率爲84%),用於巴西金羅斯黃金公司的帕拉卡圖礦和埃及的森塔明的蘇卡里礦。還進行了支持重力回收黃金的測試工作,表明重力回收迴路可以包含在CIL/CIP或磨機浮選流程表中,以提高金的回收率並減少試劑消耗。第三個流程表是堆浸處理(黃金回收率爲64-72%),這是一種常用的高容量、低品位金礦的方法;例子包括育空地區維多利亞黃金公司附近的鷹礦和阿拉斯加金羅斯黃金的諾克斯堡礦。像諾克斯堡這樣的礦山同時使用堆浸和傳統的磨機加工。

Methodology

方法論

The Phase 1 metallurgical test program focused on the Powerline Deposit as it represents the majority (~62%) of the AurMac Project's current 6.2 Moz gold inferred MRE. Banyan submitted 34 individual intervals (~991 kg) of representative drill core from Powerline to Forte Analytical in Fort Collins, Colorado. The individual intervals selected were based on gold grade, depth from surface, spatial distribution, and lithology. Three master composite samples were prepared from the individual sample intervals as shown in Figure 1 and the composites were based on the three dominant lithologies identified within Powerline which include, Comp 1 - calcareous schist ("CSCH"), Comp 2 - muscovite quartz schist ("MQST") and Comp 3 - sericite schist ("SSCH").

第一階段的冶金測試項目側重於電力線礦牀,因爲該礦牀佔AurMac項目當前推斷出的6.2莫茲金礦的大部分(約62%)。Banyan 向位於科羅拉多州柯林斯堡的 Forte Analytical 提交了 Powerline 的 34 個獨立間隔(約 991 千克)的代表性鑽芯。選擇的各個間隔是基於黃金等級、地表深度、空間分佈和巖性。如圖 1 所示,根據各個樣品間隔製備了三個主複合樣品,這些複合材料基於電力線中確定的三種主要巖性,包括 Comp 1-鈣質片岩(“CSCH”)、Comp 2-白雲母石英片岩(“MQST”)和 Comp 3-絹雲母片巖(“SSCH”)。

The Phase 1 test program for Powerline included acid-base accounting, mineralogy, comminution, bottle roll cyanidation (9.5 mm and 75 um), flotation, gravity recovery, column leach tests, Vat leach diffusion extraction tests, and a gravity-flotation-intensive cyanidation process simulation. The program was overseen by Deepak Malhotra (SME-RM of Forte Analytical) who is a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101").

Powerline 的第 1 階段測試計劃包括酸鹼覈算、礦物學、粉碎、瓶輥氰化(9.5 mm 和 75 um)、浮選、重力回收、柱浸試驗、大桶浸出擴散提取測試以及重力浮選密集型氰化過程模擬。該計劃由迪帕克·馬爾霍特拉(Forte Analytical的SME-RM)監督,根據國家儀器43-101的定義,他是合格人員, 礦產項目披露標準 (“NI 43-101”)。

Figure 1. Metallurgical Sample Locations from the Powerline Deposit

圖 1。電力線礦牀的冶金樣本位置

Sample Assays and 75um Bottle Roll Testing

樣本分析和 75um 瓶卷測試

Head samples were assayed by both fire assay and metallic screen fire assay ("MSFA") (Table 1) with fire assays averaging 0.76 g/t gold for the test intervals and an overall average of 0.66 g/t gold for metallic screen fire assays. Calculated head assays based on the bottle roll tests is shown in Table 1. The variability in the head assays, calculated head grade assays and MSFAs demonstrate the known nuggetty coarse gold exhibited in Powerline. The total sulphur in the samples ranged from 0.39% to 1.15% with an average of 0.70%, and total carbon ranged from 0.28% to 2.07% predominantly as inorganic carbon (91%). For MSFA analysis, samples were split via metallic screen into +140 mesh and -140 mesh fractions to split the coarse gold from the fine gold.

對頭部樣本進行了火焰分析和金屬屏幕火焰試驗(“MSFA”)(表1)進行了化驗,測試間隔內火焰分析的平均金含量爲0.76 g/t,金屬絲網火焰試驗的總平均金含量爲0.66 g/t。根據瓶卷測試計算出的頭部檢測結果如表 1 所示。頭部檢測、計算出的頭部等級分析和MSFA的變異性表明了電力線中已知的金塊狀粗金。樣本中的總硫量介於0.39%至1.15%之間,平均爲0.70%,總碳在0.28%至2.07%之間,主要是無機碳(91%)。在 MSFA 分析中,樣品通過金屬屏蔽分成 +140 目和 -140 個網格分數,將粗金與精金分開。

Table 1. Powerline Deposit Sample Assays and 75 um Bottle Roll Results

表 1。電力線沉積樣本分析和 75 um 瓶裝試卷結果

Sample ID

Gold Fire Assay

Calc. Head Assay

MSFA

Carbon

Sulphur

Extraction, % gold

Lithology

[g/t gold]

[g/t gold]

[g/t gold]

Total %

Total %

75um (200 Mesh)
Master Composite 1

0.415

-

-

0.76%

0.68%

87.5

CSCH

Master Composite 2

0.485

-

-

0.67%

0.86%

91.6

MQST

Master Composite 3

0.824

-

-

0.75%

0.80%

92.6

SSCH

AX-21-79 47.29-57.9

1.871

1.07

0.68

0.73%

0.65%

78.5

MQST

AX-21-140 43.5-49.5

1.201

0.90

2.81

0.64%

0.57%

90.7

CSCH

AX-21-91 131.1-135.1

0.613

0.56

0.71

1.10%

0.45%

96.4

CSCH

AX-22-208 82.7-112.8

0.633

0.94

1.2

0.28%

0.39%

89.8

MQST

AX-22-214 10.7-35.4

0.269

0.72

0.28

0.66%

0.72%

95.1

MQST

AX-22-223 25.9-32.8

1.99

0.25

0.30

0.76%

0.46%

80.1

CSCH

AX-22-225 61.5-77.7

0.587

0.37

1.49

0.62%

0.73%

56.7

CSCH

AX-22-225 85.4-111.3

0.222

0.33

0.21

0.94%

0.81%

80.4

CSCH

AX-22-227 185.9-192

0.259

0.31

0.33

0.92%

0.73%

80.2

CSCH

AX-22-230 70.1-79.3

0.317

0.73

0.62

0.49%

0.71%

91.8

MQST

AX-22-230 99.1-109.3

0.48

0.05

0.34

0.38%

0.39%

61.1

MQST

AX-22-230 135.6-166.1

0.775

0.82

0.85

2.07%

1.15%

80.3

MQST

AX-22-230 166.1-188.5

0.159

0.17

0.16

0.73%

0.44%

79.1

MQST

AX-22-231 59.1-63.7

0.464

0.39

0.45

0.84%

0.98%

86.6

CSCH

AX-22-246 58.5-82.3

0.378

0.19

0.69

0.82%

0.79%

83.0

CSCH

AX-22-246 116.7-134.6

2.674

0.42

0.63

1.77%

0.79%

89.7

MQST

AX-22-254 76.2-79.3

0.267

0.44

0.27

1.81%

0.87%

68.7

SSCH

AX-22-272 160.8-163.9

1.496

1.04

1.07

0.50%

0.52%

93.0

MQST

AX-22-273A 50.1-56.1

0.501

0.43

0.61

0.41%

0.46%

89.4

CSCH

AX-22-274 171.8-182.8

0.812

0.77

0.40

0.87%

0.78%

89.7

GNST

AX-22-291 45.7-50.6

0.816

0.70

0.70

0.87%

0.77%

87.6

MQST

AX-22-302 51.8-59.4

1.284

0.51

0.57

0.36%

0.65%

87.7

QTZT

AX-22-302 71.6-77.2

0.302

0.46

0.49

0.33%

0.63%

76.1

QTZT

AX-22-339 175.9-179.8

0.472

0.44

0.40

1.09%

0.57%

83.5

CSCH

AX-22-347 170-175

0.173

0.25

0.21

0.49%

0.62%

92.1

CSCH

樣本編號

金火試驗

Calc。頭部檢測

MSFA

硫磺

提取,% 金

巖性學

[g/t 金幣]

[g/t 金幣]

[g/t 金幣]

總計%

總計%

75um(200 網格)
主複合 1

0.415

-

-

0.76%

0.68%

87.5

CSCH

主複合 2

0.485

-

-

0.67%

0.86%

91.6

MST

大師複合 3

0.824

-

-

0.75%

0.80%

92.6

SSCH

AX-21-79 47.29-57.9

1.871

1.07

0.68

0.73%

0.65%

78.5

MST

AX-21-140 43.5-49.5

1.201

0.90

2.81

0.64%

0.57%

90.7

CSCH

AX-21-91 131.1-135.1

0.613

0.56

0.71

1.10%

0.45%

96.4

CSCH

AX-22-208 82.7-112.8

0.633

0.94

1.2

0.28%

0.39%

89.8

MST

AX-22-214 10.7-35.4

0.269

0.72

0.28

0.66%

0.72%

95.1

MST

AX-22-223 25.9-32.8

1.99

0.25

0.30

0.76%

0.46%

80.1

CSCH

AX-22-225 61.5-77.7

0.587

0.37

1.49

0.62%

0.73%

56.7

CSCH

AX-22-225 85.4-111.3

0.222

0.33

0.21

0.94%

0.81%

80.4

CSCH

AX-22-227 185.9-192

0.259

0.31

0.33

0.92%

0.73%

80.2

CSCH

AX-22-230 70.1-79.3

0.317

0.73

0.62

0.49%

0.71%

91.8

MST

AX-22-230 99.1-109.3

0.48

0.05

0.34

0.38%

0.39%

61.1

MST

AX-22-230 135.6-166.1

0.775

0.82

0.85

2.07%

1.15%

80.3

MST

AX-22-230 166.1-188.5

0.159

0.17

0.16

0.73%

0.44%

79.1

MST

AX-22-231 59.1-63.7

0.464

0.39

0.45

0.84%

0.98%

86.6

CSCH

AX-22-246 58.5-82.3

0.378

0.19

0.69

0.82%

0.79%

83.0

CSCH

AX-22-246 116.7-134.6

2.674

0.42

0.63

1.77%

0.79%

89.7

MST

AX-22-254 76.2-79.3

0.267

0.44

0.27

1.81%

0.87%

68.7

SSCH

AX-22-272 160.8-163.9

1.496

1.04

1.07

0.50%

0.52%

93.0

MST

AX-22-273A 50.1-56.1

0.501

0.43

0.61

0.41%

0.46%

89.4

CSCH

AX-22-274 171.8-182.8

0.812

0.77

0.40

0.87%

0.78%

89.7

GNST

AX-22-291 45.7-50.6

0.816

0.70

0.70

0.87%

0.77%

87.6

MST

AX-22-302 51.8-59.4

1.284

0.51

0.57

0.36%

0.65%

87.7

QTZT

AX-22-302 71.6-77.2

0.302

0.46

0.49

0.33%

0.63%

76.1

QTZT

AX-22-339 175.9-179.8

0.472

0.44

0.40

1.09%

0.57%

83.5

CSCH

AX-22-347 170-175

0.173

0.25

0.21

0.49%

0.62%

92.1

CSCH

The three representative master composites returned an average of 90.6% gold recovery using 75 um bottle roll testing. Overall gold extraction percentages ranged from 56.7% to 96.4%. These 75 um bottle roll tests show that gold recovery does not significantly change across variations in grade, depth from surface, sulphide content and lithology and that no organic carbon or other materials present preclude or reduce leach extraction rates (commonly referred to as non preg-robbing). The 75 um bottle roll tests had an average of 65% gold recovery within the first two hours and over 80% average gold recovery in the first 8 hours showing rapid gold recovery kinetics. Average cyanide consumption for the 75 um bottle rolls was low at 0.52 kg/t.

使用75微米的瓶卷測試,這三種具有代表性的主複合材料平均回收率爲90.6%。總黃金開採百分比從56.7%到96.4%不等。這些 75 微米的瓶卷測試表明,黃金回收率不會因品位、地表深度、硫化物含量和巖性變化而發生顯著變化,並且不存在任何有機碳或其他材料,會妨礙或降低浸出速率(通常稱爲非預搶法)。75微米的瓶裝測試顯示,在最初的兩個小時內,黃金的平均回收率爲65%,前8小時的平均黃金回收率超過80%,顯示出快速的黃金回收率。75 微米瓶裝的平均氰化物消耗量很低,爲 0.52 千克/噸。

Industry standard comminution testing was completed on the composite samples to determine crusher work index (CWi), Bond's ball mill work index (BWi) and abrasion work index (Ai) parameters. The average CWi for the composites was 15.2 kWh/t and the BWi was 14.6 kWh/t, indicating Powerline is classified as medium to hard.

對複合樣品完成了行業標準粉碎測試,以確定破碎機工作指數(CWi)、邦德的球磨機工作指數(bWi)和磨損工作指數(Ai)參數。複合材料的平均CWi爲15.2 kWh/t,bWi爲14.6 kWh/t,這表明電力線被歸類爲中到硬。

Gravity Recovery

重力恢復

Coarse gold is evident across Powerline and, therefore, gravity recovery was assessed as part of the Phase 1 program. Initial gravity recovery testing was completed on the three master composite samples and subsequently assayed as either rougher concentrate or cleaner concentrate. The Knelson concentrate produced the rougher concentrate, which was then further cleaned using a Gemeni table to produce the cleaner concentrate. Two grind sizes, 150 um (100 mesh) and 212 um (65 mesh), were tested throughout the gravity campaign, and the average gold recovery from rougher gravity concentrate was 53%.

Powerline上有明顯的粗金,因此,作爲第一階段計劃的一部分,對重力回收進行了評估。對三個主複合材料樣品的初始重力回收測試已經完成,隨後被測定爲更粗糙的濃縮物或更清潔的濃縮物。Knelson 濃縮物生產了更粗糙的濃縮物,然後使用 Gemeni 臺進一步對其進行清潔,生產出更清潔的濃縮物。在整個重力運動中測試了兩種研磨規格,即150微米(100目)和212微米(65目),從粗糙的重力濃縮物中回收的金平均爲53%。

Flotation

發行股份

Flotation testing was conducted on all three composites across three different grind sizes: 150 um (100 mesh), 75 um (200 mesh), and 44 um (325 mesh). The tailings from the gravity recovery tests completed on the three composites were also assessed for flotation response at the 100 mesh particle size. All composites demonstrated high gold recovery in rougher concentrate with an average gold recovery of 89% from the composite samples (Table 2). Of significance is the overall low mass pull of ~3.7% on average. The high rougher flotation concentrate recovery along with the low mass pull suggests a small intensive cyanidation circuit leaching a flotation rougher concentrate as a process flow sheet option to be further investigated.

對所有三種複合材料進行了浮選測試,它們採用了三種不同的研磨尺寸:150 um(100 目)、75 um(200 目)和 44 um(325 目)。還評估了對三種複合材料完成的重力回收測試產生的尾礦在100目粒徑下的浮選響應。所有複合材料在粗糙的精礦中均表現出較高的金回收率,複合樣品的平均金回收率爲89%(表2)。值得注意的是,總體質量拉力平均約爲3.7%。較高的粗浮濃縮物回收率和較低的質量拉力表明,一個小型的強化氰化迴路將浮選粗糙濃縮物浸出作爲工藝流程表的選項,有待進一步研究。

Table 2. Flotation Results for Powerline Deposit Composites

表 2.電力線沉積複合材料的浮選結果

Sample

P 80 Grind Size

Concentrate wt%

Gold Recovery

Conc. Grade

Calc. Head

Tail Grade

[ um ]

[wt.%]

[% gold]

[g/t gold]

[g/t gold]

[g/t gold]

Comp 1

150

3.3

89.1

31.67

1.16

0.13

Comp 1

75

2.7

75.1

12.84

0.47

0.12

Comp 1

44

6.1

86.5

7.86

0.56

0.08

Comp 1 Grav Tail

150

2.6

73.1

19.31

0.69

0.19

Comp 2

150

3.0

92.8

29.74

0.95

0.07

Comp 2

75

2.6

94.6

60.01

1.63

0.09

Comp 2

44

3.5

92.0

25.12

0.96

0.08

Comp 2 Grav Tail

150

2.6

91.0

37.23

1.08

0.10

Comp 3

150

4.8

86.7

19.62

1.08

0.15

Comp 3

75

2.8

89.3

35.33

1.09

0.12

Comp 3

44

4.3

92.7

28.15

1.32

0.10

Comp 3 Grav Tail

150

3.0

86.0

25.97

0.90

0.13

示例

P 80 研磨尺寸

濃縮物 wt%

黃金回收

Conc。等級

Calc。頭

尾部等級

[嗯]

[重量%]

[% 金幣]

[g/t 金幣]

[g/t 金幣]

[g/t 金幣]

Comp 1

150

3.3

89.1

31.67

1.16

0.13

Comp 1

75

2.7

75.1

12.84

0.47

0.12

Comp 1

44

6.1

86.5

7.86

0.56

0.08

Comp 1 Grav Tail

150

2.6

73.1

19.31

0.69

0.19

Comp 2

150

3.0

92.8

29.74

0.95

0.07

Comp 2

75

2.6

94.6

60.01

1.63

0.09

Comp 2

44

3.5

92.0

25.12

0.96

0.08

Comp 2 Grav Tail

150

2.6

91.0

37.23

1.08

0.10

Comp 3

150

4.8

86.7

19.62

1.08

0.15

Comp 3

75

2.8

89.3

35.33

1.09

0.12

Comp 3

44

4.3

92.7

28.15

1.32

0.10

Comp 3 Grav Tail

150

3.0

86.0

25.97

0.90

0.13

Gravity - Flotation - Intensive Cyanidation

重力-浮選-強化氰化

Based on the individual flotation and gravity results, a non-optimized process simulation test was completed on remaining Composite 2 material and incorporated grinding, gravity recovery, rougher flotation, and intensive cyanidation of the concentrate products (gravity+float concentrate). Gravity and flotation recovery of Composite 2 resulted in 95% recovery and intensive cyanidation of the flotation and gravity concentrate returned 88% for a total recovery of 84.2%.

根據個別浮選和重力結果,對剩餘的Composite 2材料完成了非優化的過程模擬測試,並對精礦產品(重力+浮選濃縮物)進行了研磨、重力回收、粗糙浮選和強度氰化處理。Composite 2的重力和浮選回收率使浮選和重力濃縮物的回收率爲95%,重力濃縮物的回收率爲88%,總回收率爲84.2%。

Heap Leaching Test Work

堆浸測試工作

The response of Powerline to heap leach was assessed through a combination of coarse 9.5 mm bottle roll tests, standard column (10 cm) leach tests and Vat leach diffusion extraction tests. Coarse bottle roll tests at a crush size of P80 passing 9.5 mm were completed over a 264-hour test duration using standard bottle roll testing parameters. The average gold recovery for the composite weighted intervals was consistent and ranged from 33.7% - 35.6%. Conventional 10 cm diameter column leach tests at a crush size of P80 passing 9.5 mm were completed in duplicate on the three master composites. The overall gold recovery of all the column leach tests was 52.3% and ranged from 34.5% - 62.6% over a 76 to 78-day leach duration. The decrease in gold recovery with the coarse 9.5 mm crush size compared to the 75 um particle size shows that gold recovery is likely size dependent. Bottle roll and column leach test results are shown in Table 3.

Powerline對堆浸的反應是通過粗糙的9.5毫米瓶卷試驗、標準柱(10厘米)浸出測試和大桶浸出擴散提取測試相結合來評估的。壓碎大小爲 P 時進行粗瓶軋製試驗80 使用標準瓶卷測試參數,在 264 小時的測試持續時間內完成了 9.5 mm 的測試。綜合加權區間的平均黃金回收率保持穩定,介於33.7%至35.6%之間。常規直徑爲 10 cm 的柱浸試驗,壓碎尺寸爲 P80 在三種主複合材料上重複完成了 9.5 毫米的加工。所有柱浸測試的總金回收率爲52.3%,在76至78天的浸出持續時間內從34.5%到62.6%不等。與顆粒大小爲75微米相比,粗碎尺寸爲9.5毫米的黃金回收率有所降低,這表明金的回收率可能取決於大小。瓶輥和柱浸試驗結果如表 3 所示。

Table 3. 9.5 mm Bottle Roll and Column Leach Test Results for Powerline Deposit

表 3. 電力線沉積物的 9.5 mm 瓶卷和柱濾測試結果

Bottle Rolls

Composite Average

10 cm Column Leach

Sample ID

Calc. Head Grade g/t gold

Gold %Recovery

Leach Duration (hrs)

Calc. Head Grade g/t gold

Gold %Recovery

Leach Duration (days)

Composite 1

0.46

34.9

264

0.498

57.9

76

Composite 1 Dup

Na

na

na

0.684

57.1

78

Composite 2

0.68

35.6

264

0.726

47.0

78

Composite 2 Dup

Na

na

na

0.911

34.5

78

Composite 3

0.57

33.7

264

0.812

55.1

78

Composite 3 Dup

Na

na

na

0.571

62.6

78

瓶裝卷

綜合平均值

10 厘米柱狀濾管

樣本編號

Calc。Head 等級 g/t 金幣

黃金回收百分比

浸出時間(小時)

Calc。Head 等級 g/t 金幣

黃金回收百分比

浸出時間(天)

複合材料 1

0.46

34.9

264

0.498

57.9

76

複合材料 1 杯

不是

不是

0.684

57.1

78

複合材料 2

0.68

35.6

264

0.726

47.0

78

複合材料 2 Dup

不是

不是

0.911

34.5

78

複合材料 3

0.57

33.7

264

0.812

55.1

78

複合材料 3 Dup

不是

不是

0.571

62.6

78

Vat Leach Diffusion Extraction Testing

Vat Leach 擴散提取測試

Vat leach diffusion testing was conducted on both Composite 1 and Composite 2 material at size fractions of 12.7 mm, 9.5 mm and 6.4 mm. The Vat leach diffusion test is used in the early stages of metallurgical testing to optimize the crush size for a heap leach process flow sheet. Discrete particle sizes are loaded into a 15-30 kg charged Vat with cyanide solution, then a cycle of flooding/draining cyanide solution on a 24-hour basis in the early stages of testing, then to a weekly basis and continues until extraction is diminished, normally completed over 100-200 days depending on the particle size. Utilizing the Vat data of discrete particles measuring diffusion rates of the material, diffusion modeling was performed to represent a P80 9.5 mm particle size distribution, with recovery curves generated for estimating heap leach recoveries over an extended leach period (Figure 2). Long-term gold recovery is estimated at 64% for Composite 1 and 72% for Composite 2. The higher recovery from the Vats compared to the 10 cm column (P80 9.5 mm crush) tests also demonstrates a potential influence by coarse gold.

對複合材料1和複合材料2進行了大桶浸出擴散測試,其尺寸分數分別爲12.7毫米、9.5毫米和6.4毫米。大桶浸出擴散測試用於冶金測試的早期階段,以優化堆浸工藝流程表的壓碎尺寸。將離散顆粒大小裝入裝有氰化物溶液的 15-30 千克大桶中,然後在測試的早期階段每隔 24 小時對氰化物溶液進行一次充注/排放,然後每週一次,一直持續到萃取量減少,通常在 100-200 天內完成,具體取決於粒徑大小。利用離散顆粒的 Vat 數據測量材料的擴散速率,進行了擴散建模以表示 P80 9.5 mm 的粒徑分佈,生成的回收曲線用於估算延長浸出週期內的堆浸回收率(圖 2)。據估計,綜合1的黃金長期回收率爲64%,綜合2的長期黃金回收率爲72%。與 10 cm 立柱相比,Vats 的回收率更高 (P80 9.5 毫米(壓碎)測試還顯示了粗金的潛在影響。

Figure 2. Modelled Vat Leach Gold Recovery Curves for Powerline Deposit Composites

圖 2。電力線沉積物複合材料的建模還原濾金回收曲線

Environmental

環保

Mineralogy and acid-base accounting were performed on the three master composite samples and the results indicate that Powerline is not acid generating and has excess buffering capacity (Table 4). The samples were mainly composed of quartz (>70%) and minor quantities of plagioclase, orthoclase, muscovite, biotite, clinochlore, epidote and calcite with pyrite being the primary sulphide mineral present. The non-acid generating nature and excess buffering capacity of Powerline is an important consideration in future permitting and waste management designs.

對三個主複合樣品進行了礦物學和酸鹼覈算,結果表明 Powerline 不產酸,緩衝能力過剩(表 4)。這些樣品主要由石英(> 70%)和少量的斜長石、正長石、白雲母、黑雲母、斜綠巖、花崗岩和方解石組成,其中黃鐵礦是存在的主要硫化物礦物。Powerline的無酸生成性質和過剩的緩衝能力是未來許可和廢物管理設計的重要考慮因素。

Table 4. Acid-Base Accounting Results for Powerline Deposit Composites

表 4.電力線沉積複合材料的酸鹼覈算結果

Neutralization Potential

Total Sulphur

Acid Generation Potential

Net Neutralization Potential

Neutralization Potential Ratio

kg/t

%

kg/t

kg/t

Comp 1

76.1

0.68

21.3

54.8

3.58

Comp 2

53.6

0.86

26.9

26.7

2.01

Comp 3

66.1

0.80

25.0

41.1

2.64

中和潛力

總硫

酸生成潛力

淨中和潛力

中和電位比

kg/t

%

kg/t

kg/t

Comp 1

76.1

0.68

21.3

54.8

3.58

Comp 2

53.6

0.86

26.9

26.7

2.01

Comp 3

66.1

0.80

25.0

41.1

2.64

Summary and Next Steps

摘要和後續步驟

The results of the Phase 1 metallurgical testing program demonstrate gold recoveries ranging from 84% - 91% in multiple conventional process flow sheets inclusive of grinding followed by CIL/CIP cyanide leaching, flotation and leaching of a rougher concentrate, and as well as flotation, gravity recovery and intensive cyanide leaching of the concentrates. Heap Leach recoveries range from 64% to 72%. Environmental testing is positive showing excess buffering capacity coupled with low sulphide content meaning that Powerline is non-acid generating.

第一階段冶金測試項目的結果表明,在多種傳統工藝流程中,金的回收率在84%至91%之間,包括研磨,然後進行CIL/CIP氰化物浸出、粗糙精礦的浮選和浸出,以及精礦的浮選、重力回收和強度氰化物浸出。Heap Leach 回收率從 64% 到 72% 不等。環境測試呈陽性,顯示緩衝容量過大,硫化物含量低,這意味着電力線不產生酸。

The test work results are supportive of all these processing options being carried forward with additional samples from Powerline, as well as expansion of the program to test samples from Aurex Hill and Airstrip Deposits. Continuing test work will endeavor to enhance understanding of:

測試工作結果支持所有這些處理方案繼續使用 Powerline 的更多樣本,並擴展該計劃以測試來自Aurex Hill和Airstrip Dopisits的樣本。持續的測試工作將努力增進對以下內容的理解:

  • gold deportment;
  • grind sizes for flotation, flotation concentrate and CIP/CIL;
  • gravity separation; and,
  • additional work on heap leaching including crush size sensitivity.
  • 黃金驅逐令;
  • 浮選、浮選濃縮液和 CIP/CIL 的研磨尺寸;
  • 重力分離;以及,
  • 堆浸方面的其他工作,包括粉碎大小靈敏度。

The focus will remain on flow sheet optimization and minimizing operating costs to maximize value in future economic studies.

重點仍將放在流程表優化和最小化運營成本上,以最大限度地提高未來經濟研究的價值。

Qualified Persons

合格人員

Deepak Malhotra SME-RM, Director of Metallurgy, and Barry Carlson P.E, P.Eng, QP, President of Forte Dynamics are both "Qualified Persons" as ‎defined by NI 43-101, independent of the Company and have reviewed and approved the content of this news release.‎ Mr. Malhotra and Mr. Carlson have verified the data disclosed in this news release, including the sampling, ‎‎analytical and test data underlying the information.

冶金董事迪帕克·馬爾霍特拉SME-RM和Forte Dynamics總裁Barry Carlson P.E. P.Eng,QP,均爲 NI 43-101 的 “合格人士”,獨立於公司,他們已經審查並批准了本新聞稿的內容。‎defined‎ 馬爾霍特拉先生和卡爾森先生已經證實了本新聞稿中披露的數據,包括抽樣、‎‎analytical 和信息所依據的測試數據。

Paul D. Gray, P.Geo., is a "Qualified Person" as ‎defined under NI 43-101 and has reviewed and approved the content of this news release.‎ Mr. Gray is Banyan's geological consultant and has verified the data disclosed in this news release, including the sampling, ‎‎analytical and test data underlying the information.

P.Geo. 的保羅·格雷是 NI 43-101 下的‎defined 的 “合格人士”,他已經審查並批准了本新聞稿的內容。‎ 格雷先生是Banyan的地質顧問,他已經驗證了本新聞稿中披露的數據,包括採樣、‎‎analytical 和信息所依據的測試數據。

Upcoming Events

即將舉行的活動

  • CEM Whistler Capital Event, February 9 - 11, 2024
  • Adelaide Capital Webinar - February 15, 2024 - 11 AM PST / 2 PM EST.
  • BMO 33rd Global Metals, Mining & Critical Minerals Conference, February 25 - 28, 2024
  • Tombstone Gold Rush Breakfast - Fireside Chat - Toronto, March 5, 2024
    • 7AM to 9 AM EST
  • Red Cloud Pre-PDAC Mining Showcase, Toronto, March 1
  • PDAC, March 3 - 6, 2023
    • Exhibitor Booth No. 2213, March 3 - 4
    • PDAC 2024 One on One Meeting Program, March 4 - 5
    • Core Shack Exhibitor Booth No. 3106, March 5 - 6
  • CEM 惠斯勒資本活動,2024 年 2 月 9 日至 11 日
  • 阿德萊德資本網絡研討會——太平洋標準時間2024年2月15日上午11點/美國東部標準時間下午2點。
  • BMO 第 33 屆全球金屬、礦業和關鍵礦產會議,2024 年 2 月 25 日至 28 日
  • Tombstone Gold Rush 早餐——爐邊閒聊——多倫多,2024 年 3 月 5 日
    • 美國東部時間上午7點至上午9點
  • Red Cloud pre-PDAC 礦業展示會,多倫多,3 月 1 日
  • PDAC,2023 年 3 月 3 日至 6 日
    • 參展商展位號 2213,3 月 3 日至 4 日
    • PDAC 2024 一對一會議計劃,3 月 4 日至 5 日
    • Core Shack 參展商展位號 3106,3 月 5 日至 6 日

About Banyan

關於悅榕莊

Banyan's primary asset, the AurMac Project is adjacent to Victoria Gold's Eagle Gold Mine, in Canada's Yukon Territory. The current inferred MRE for the AurMac Project of 6.2 million ounces has an effective date of May 18, 2023.

悅榕的主要資產AurMac項目毗鄰加拿大育空地區的維多利亞黃金公司的鷹金礦。目前推斷的AurMac項目620萬盎司的MRE的生效日期爲2023年5月18日。

The 173 square kilometres ("sq km") AurMac Project lies 30 km from Victoria Gold's Eagle Project and adjacent to Hecla Mining's high grade Keno Hill Silver mine. The AurMac Project is transected by the main Yukon highway and access road to the Victoria Gold open-pit, heap leach Eagle Gold mine. The AurMac Project benefits from a 3-phase powerline, existing power station and cell phone coverage. Banyan has a right to earn up to a 100% interest, in both the Aurex and McQuesten Properties, subject to certain royalties.

173平方千米(“平方千米”)的AurMac項目距離維多利亞黃金公司的鷹項目30公里,毗鄰赫克拉礦業的高品位基諾山銀礦。AurMac項目橫穿育空地區的主要高速公路和通往維多利亞黃金露天礦堆浸鷹金礦的通道。AurMac項目受益於三相電力線、現有的發電站和手機覆蓋範圍。悅榕有權在Aurex和McQuesten地產中賺取高達100%的權益,但須繳納一定的特許權使用費。

The inferred MRE for the AurMac Project was prepared on May 18, 2023, and consisted of 6,181,000 ounces of gold (see Table 5) hosted within near surface, road accessible pit constrained Mineral Resources contained in three near/on-surface deposits: the Airstrip, Aurex Hill and Powerline Deposits.

AurMac項目的推斷MRE於2023年5月18日製定,由6,181,000盎司黃金(見表5)組成,這些黃金位於近地表、道路可進入的礦坑限制的礦產資源中,這些礦產資源包含在三個近地表/地表礦牀中:簡易機場、奧雷克斯山和電力線礦牀。

Table 5: Pit-Constrained Inferred Mineral Resources - AurMac Project

表 5:礦坑受限的推斷礦產資源-AurMac 項目

Deposit Gold Cut-Off (g/t) Tonnage
(Mt)
Average Gold Grade (g/t) Contained Gold (koz)
Airstrip 0.25 41.2 0.68 897
Powerline 0.25 197.4 0.61 3,840
Aurex Hill 0.30 74.3 0.60 1,444
Total Combined 0.25 to 0.3 312.9 0.61 6,181
存款 黃金截止值 (g/t) 噸位
(公噸)
平均黃金等級 (g/t) 內含黃金(koz)
簡易機場 0.25 41.2 0.68 897
電力線 0.25 197.4 0.61 3,840
奧雷克斯·希爾 0.30 74.3 0.60 1,444
合計 0.25 到 0.3 312.9 0.61 6,181

Notes :

注意事項 :‎

  1. The effective date for the inferred MRE is May 18, 2023. The inferred MRE for the AurMac Project was prepared by Marc Jutras, P.Eng., M.A.Sc., Principal, Ginto Consulting Inc., an independent Qualified Person in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101. The technical report supporting the MRE (the "Technical Report") entitled "Technical Report - AurMac Property, Mayo Mining District, Yukon Territory, Canada" has been filed on SEDAR at effective July 7, 2023.
  2. Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, changes in global gold markets or other relevant issues.
  3. The CIM Definition Standards were followed for classification of Mineral Resources. The quantity and grade of reported Inferred Mineral Resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature ‎and there has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred Mineral Resources as an ‎Indicated Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to an ‎Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource category.
  4. Mineral Resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.25 g/t Au for the Airstrip and Powerline and 0.3 g/t Au for the Aurex Hill deposits, using a US$/CAN$ exchange rate of 0.75 and constrained within an open pit shell optimized with the Lerchs-Grossman algorithm to constrain the Mineral Resources with the following estimated parameters: gold price of US$1,800/ounce, US$2.50/t mining cost, US$5.50/t processing cost, UD$2.00/t G+A, 80% heap leach recoveries, and 45° pit slope.1
  5. The number of tonnes was rounded to the nearest hundred thousand. The number of ounces was rounded to the nearest thousand. Any discrepancies in the totals are due to rounding effects; rounding followed the recommendations as per NI 43-101.
  1. 推斷的 MRE 的生效日期爲 2023 年 5 月 18 日。根據NI 43-101的要求,AurMac項目推斷出的MRE由金拓諮詢公司負責人兼P.Eng.、碩士學位兼負責人Marc Jutras編寫,他是一名獨立的合格人士。支持MRE的技術報告(“技術報告”),標題爲 “技術報告——加拿大育空地區梅奧礦區AurMac地產”,已於2023年7月7日向SEDAR提交。
  2. 非礦產儲備的礦產資源沒有顯示出經濟可行性。礦產資源的估算可能會受到環境, 許可, 法律, 所有權, 稅收, 社會政治, 市場營銷的重大影響, 全球黃金市場的變化或其他相關問題。
  3. 礦產資源分類遵循了 CIM 定義標準。本估計中報告的推斷礦產資源的數量和品位本質上是不確定的‎and 勘探不足以將這些推斷礦產資源定義爲‎Indicated 礦產資源,也不確定進一步勘探是否會導致將其升級爲‎Indicated 或實測礦產資源類別。
  4. 據報告,機場和電力線的礦產資源的臨界品位爲0.25 g/t Au,Aurex Hill礦牀的臨界品位爲0.3克/噸金,採用0.75美元/加元的匯率,並限制在露天殼體內,使用以下估計參數限制礦產資源:金價1,800美元/盎司,開採成本2.50美元/噸,加工費用爲5.50美元成本、2.00美元/噸 G+A、80% 的堆浸回收率和 45° 的礦坑斜率。1
  5. 噸數四捨五入到最接近的十萬噸。盎司的數目四捨五入到最接近的千位。總數中的任何差異都是四捨五入效應造成的;四捨五入遵循NI 43-101的建議。

In addition to the AurMac Project, the Company holds the Hyland Gold Project, located 70 km Northeast of Watson Lake, Yukon, along the Southeast end of the Tintina Gold Belt (the "Hyland Project"). The Hyland Project represents a sediment hosted, structurally controlled, intrusion related gold deposit, within a large land package (over 125 sq km), accessible by a network of existing gravel access roads.

除AurMac項目外,該公司還擁有海蘭黃金項目,該項目位於育空地區沃森湖東北70公里處,位於丁蒂納金帶(“海蘭項目”)東南端。Hyland項目是一個沉積物託管、結構受控的、與入侵相關的金礦牀,位於一大片土地中(超過125平方千米),可通過現有的碎石通道網絡進入。

Banyan trades on the TSX-Venture Exchange under the symbol "BYN" and is quoted on the OTCQB Venture Market under the symbol "BYAGF". For more information, please visit the corporate website at or contact the Company.

Banyan在多倫多證券交易所風險交易所上市,股票代碼爲 “BYN”,並在OTCQB風險投資市場上以 “BYAGF” 的代碼上市。欲了解更多信息,請訪問公司網站或聯繫公司。

ON BEHALF OF BANYAN GOLD CORPORATION

代表悅榕金公司

(signed) "Tara Christie"
Tara Christie
President & CEO

(簽名) “塔拉·克里斯蒂”
塔拉·克里斯蒂
總裁兼首席執行官

For more information, please contact:
Tara Christie • 778 928 0556 • tchristie@banyangold.com
Jasmine Sangria • 604 312 5610 • jsangria@banyangold.com

欲了解更多信息,請聯繫:
塔拉·克里斯蒂 • 778 928 0556 • tchristie@banyangold.com
茉莉桑格利亞汽酒 • 604 312 5610 • jsangria@banyangold.com

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT: Neither the TSX Venture Exchange, its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) nor OTCQB Venture Market accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

警示聲明:多倫多證券交易所風險投資交易所、其監管服務提供商(該術語在多倫多證券交易所風險交易所的政策中定義)和OTCQB風險市場均不對本新聞稿的充分性或準確性承擔責任。

No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein.

沒有證券交易所、證券委員會或其他監管機構批准或拒絕批准此處包含的信息。

FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION: This news release contains forward-looking information, which is not comprised of historical facts and is based upon the Company's current internal expectations, estimates, projections, assumptions and beliefs. Such information can generally be identified by the use of forwarding-looking wording such as "may", "will", "expect", "estimate", "anticipate", "intend(s)", "believe", "potential" and "continue" or the negative thereof or similar variations. Forward-looking information involves risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events, results, performance, prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Forward looking information in this news release includes, but is not limited to, the Company's plans for future metallurgical test work; potential future economic studies, potential future advancement and optimization of processing flow sheets, and statements regarding process flow sheet expectations; mineral resource estimates; mineral recoveries and anticipated mining costs.

前瞻性信息:本新聞稿包含前瞻性信息,這些信息不包含歷史事實,基於公司當前的內部預期、估計、預測、假設和信念。此類信息通常可以通過使用前瞻性措辭來識別,例如 “可能”、“將”、“期望”、“估計”、“預期”、“打算”、“相信”、“潛在” 和 “繼續”,或其否定或類似的變體。前瞻性信息涉及風險、不確定性和其他因素,這些因素可能導致實際事件、結果、業績、前景和機會與此類前瞻性信息所表達或暗示的內容存在重大差異。本新聞稿中的前瞻性信息包括但不限於公司未來的冶金測試工作計劃;潛在的未來經濟研究、加工流程表的潛在未來進展和優化,以及有關工藝流程表預期的聲明;礦產資源估計;礦產回收率和預期採礦成本。

Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking information include uncertainties inherent in resource estimates, continuity and extent of mineralization, capital and operating costs varying significantly from estimates, the preliminary nature of metallurgical test results, delays in obtaining or failures to obtain required governmental, environmental or other project approvals, political risks, uncertainties relating to the estimation of mineral resources and the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, changes in equity markets, inflation, changes in exchange rates, fluctuations in commodity prices, availability of funding, and the other risks involved in the mineral exploration and development industry, enhanced risks inherent to conducting business in any jurisdiction, and those risks set out in Banyan's public documents filed on SEDAR. Although Banyan believes that the assumptions and factors used in preparing the forward-looking information in this news release are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on such information, which only applies as of the date of this news release, and no assurance can be given that such events will occur in the disclosed time frames or at all. Banyan disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by law.

可能導致實際結果與此類前瞻性信息存在重大差異的因素包括資源估算中固有的不確定性、礦化的連續性和範圍、與估計值相差很大的資本和運營成本、冶金測試結果的初步性質、延遲獲得或未能獲得所需的政府、環境或其他項目批准、政治風險、與礦產資源估算相關的不確定性以及未來所需融資的供應和成本,股票市場的變化、通貨膨脹、匯率變化、大宗商品價格的波動、資金的供應以及礦產勘探和開發行業所涉及的其他風險,在任何司法管轄區開展業務所固有的風險增加,以及Banyan在SEDAR上提交的公開文件中列出的風險。儘管Banyan認爲在本新聞稿中準備前瞻性信息時使用的假設和因素是合理的,但不應過分依賴此類信息,這僅適用於本新聞發佈之日,也無法保證此類事件將在披露的時間範圍內發生或根本無法保證。除非法律要求,否則Banyan不打算或義務更新或修改任何前瞻性信息,無論是由於新信息、未來事件還是其他原因。

SOURCE: Banyan Gold Corp.

來源:悅榕黃金公司


声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論