share_log

AGNC Investment Corp. (NASDAQ:AGNC) Most Popular Amongst Individual Investors Who Own 59% of the Shares, Institutions Hold 40%

AGNC Investment Corp. (NASDAQ:AGNC) Most Popular Amongst Individual Investors Who Own 59% of the Shares, Institutions Hold 40%

AGNC投資公司(納斯達克股票代碼:AGNC)在擁有59%股份的個人投資者中最受歡迎,機構持有40%
Simply Wall St ·  02/06 09:34

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in AGNC Investment indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • The top 25 shareholders own 29% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 個人投資者對AGNC Investment的大量所有權表明,他們在管理和業務戰略中集體擁有更大的發言權
  • 前 25 名股東擁有公司 29% 的股份
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

A look at the shareholders of AGNC Investment Corp. (NASDAQ:AGNC) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 59% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看AGNC投資公司(納斯達克股票代碼:AGNC)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。個人投資者擁有公司的最大股份,擁有59%的股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Meanwhile, institutions make up 40% of the company's shareholders. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies.

同時,機構佔公司股東的40%。機構通常擁有比較成熟的公司的股份,而內部人士擁有相當一部分小型公司的情況並不少見。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of AGNC Investment.

在下圖中,我們放大了AGNC Investment的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:AGNC Ownership Breakdown February 6th 2024
納斯達克GS:AGNC 所有權明細 2024 年 2 月 6 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AGNC Investment?

關於AGNC投資,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in AGNC Investment. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at AGNC Investment's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所見,機構投資者在AGNC投資中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看AGNC Investment的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:AGNC Earnings and Revenue Growth February 6th 2024
納斯達克GS:AGNC收益和收入增長 2024年2月6日

AGNC Investment is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 8.3%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.2% and 2.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

AGNC投資不歸對沖基金所有。該公司的最大股東是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其所有權爲8.3%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的5.2%和2.2%。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我們的所有權數據時,我們發現25位大股東共同擁有的股份不到50%,這意味着沒有一個人擁有多數股權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of AGNC Investment

AGNC 投資的內部人士所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終算在內。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of AGNC Investment Corp. in their own names. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$54m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人士以自己的名義擁有AGNC投資公司不到1%的股份。這是一家大公司,因此即使是很小的比例權益也可以在董事會和股東之間建立一致。在本案中,內部人士擁有價值5400萬美元的股票。看到至少有一部分內部所有權總是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 59% of AGNC Investment shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

公衆主要由個人投資者組成,共持有AGNC投資59%的股份。有了這麼多的所有權,散戶投資者可以在影響股東回報的決策中共同發揮作用,例如股息政策和董事任命。他們還可以對可能不會提高盈利能力的收購或合併行使投票權。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - AGNC Investment has 4 warning signs (and 2 which are significant) we think you should know about.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。以風險爲例——AGNC Investment有4個警告信號(其中2個是重大警示信號),我們認爲你應該知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論