share_log

Recent 10% Pullback Isn't Enough to Hurt Long-term Netac Technology (SZSE:300042) Shareholders, They're Still up 142% Over 5 Years

Recent 10% Pullback Isn't Enough to Hurt Long-term Netac Technology (SZSE:300042) Shareholders, They're Still up 142% Over 5 Years

最近10%的回調不足以傷害Netac Technology(深圳證券交易所代碼:300042)的長期股東,他們在5年內仍上漲了142%
Simply Wall St ·  02/07 19:11

Netac Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300042) shareholders might understandably be very concerned that the share price has dropped 37% in the last quarter. But that doesn't change the fact that shareholders have received really good returns over the last five years. It's fair to say most would be happy with 137% the gain in that time. So while it's never fun to see a share price fall, it's important to look at a longer time horizon. Ultimately business performance will determine whether the stock price continues the positive long term trend.

Netac技術有限公司(深圳證券交易所股票代碼:300042)的股東可能會非常擔心上個季度股價下跌了37%,這是可以理解的。但這並不能改變股東在過去五年中獲得了非常不錯的回報的事實。可以公平地說,大多數人會對那段時間內的137%的漲幅感到滿意。因此,儘管看到股價下跌從來都不是一件好事,但重要的是要着眼於更長的時間跨度。最終,業務表現將決定股價是否延續長期的積極趨勢。

Although Netac Technology has shed CN¥541m from its market cap this week, let's take a look at its longer term fundamental trends and see if they've driven returns.

儘管Netac Technology本週的市值下跌了5.41億元人民幣,但讓我們來看看其長期基本面趨勢,看看它們是否推動了回報。

To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS).

用本傑明·格雷厄姆的話來說:從短期來看,市場是一臺投票機器,但從長遠來看,它是一臺稱重機。研究市場情緒如何隨着時間的推移而變化的一種方法是研究公司股價與其每股收益(EPS)之間的相互作用。

During five years of share price growth, Netac Technology actually saw its EPS drop 14% per year.

在五年的股價增長中,Netac Technology的每股收益實際上每年下降14%。

Essentially, it doesn't seem likely that investors are focused on EPS. Since the change in EPS doesn't seem to correlate with the change in share price, it's worth taking a look at other metrics.

從本質上講,投資者似乎不太可能將注意力集中在每股收益上。由於每股收益的變化似乎與股價的變化無關,因此值得一看其他指標。

We doubt the modest 0.2% dividend yield is attracting many buyers to the stock. In contrast revenue growth of 13% per year is probably viewed as evidence that Netac Technology is growing, a real positive. In that case, the company may be sacrificing current earnings per share to drive growth.

我們懷疑0.2%的適度股息收益率是否吸引了許多買家購買該股。相比之下,每年13%的收入增長可能被視爲Netac Technology正在增長的證據,這是一個真正的積極因素。在這種情況下,該公司可能會犧牲當前的每股收益來推動增長。

The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).

下圖描述了收入和收入隨時間推移而發生的變化(點擊圖片即可顯示確切的數值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300042 Earnings and Revenue Growth February 8th 2024
SZSE: 300042 2024 年 2 月 8 日收益和收入增長

This free interactive report on Netac Technology's balance sheet strength is a great place to start, if you want to investigate the stock further.

如果你想進一步調查Netac Technology的資產負債表實力,這份關於Netac Technology資產負債表實力的免費互動報告是一個很好的起點。

What About Dividends?

分紅呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. As it happens, Netac Technology's TSR for the last 5 years was 142%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

在考慮投資回報時,重要的是要考慮兩者之間的區別 股東總回報 (TSR) 和 股價回報。基於股息再投資的假設,股東總回報率納入了任何分拆或貼現資本籌集的價值以及任何股息。可以說,股東總回報率更全面地描述了股票產生的回報。碰巧的是,Netac Technology在過去5年的股東總回報率爲142%,超過了前面提到的股價回報率。而且,猜測股息支付在很大程度上解釋了這種分歧是沒有好處的!

A Different Perspective

不同的視角

We're pleased to report that Netac Technology shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 80% over one year. Of course, that includes the dividend. Since the one-year TSR is better than the five-year TSR (the latter coming in at 19% per year), it would seem that the stock's performance has improved in recent times. In the best case scenario, this may hint at some real business momentum, implying that now could be a great time to delve deeper. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Netac Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Even so, be aware that Netac Technology is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

我們很高興地向大家報告,Netac Technology的股東在一年內獲得了80%的總股東回報率。當然,這包括股息。由於一年期股東總回報率好於五年期股東總回報率(後者爲每年19%),因此該股的表現似乎在最近有所改善。在最好的情況下,這可能暗示着一些真正的業務勢頭,這意味着現在可能是深入研究的好時機。長期跟蹤股價表現總是很有意思的。但是,爲了更好地理解 Netac 技術,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。即便如此,請注意,Netac Technology在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,您應該知道...

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of companies we expect will grow earnings.

當然,通過尋找其他地方,你可能會找到一筆不錯的投資。因此,請看一下我們預計收益將增加的這份免費公司名單。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Chinese exchanges.

請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在中國交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論