share_log

Concerns Surrounding Under Armour's (NYSE:UAA) Performance

Concerns Surrounding Under Armour's (NYSE:UAA) Performance

圍繞安德瑪(紐約證券交易所代碼:UAA)業績的擔憂
Simply Wall St ·  02/16 08:25

Under Armour, Inc. (NYSE:UAA) just released a solid earnings report, and the stock displayed some strength. However, we think that shareholders should be cautious as we found some worrying factors underlying the profit.

安德瑪公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:UAA)剛剛發佈了一份穩健的收益報告,該股表現出一定的走強。但是,我們認爲股東應謹慎行事,因爲我們發現了利潤背後的一些令人擔憂的因素。

earnings-and-revenue-history
NYSE:UAA Earnings and Revenue History February 16th 2024
紐約證券交易所:UAA 收益和收入歷史記錄 2024 年 2 月 16 日

An Unusual Tax Situation

不尋常的稅收狀況

Under Armour reported a tax benefit of US$109m, which is well worth noting. It's always a bit noteworthy when a company is paid by the tax man, rather than paying the tax man. The receipt of a tax benefit is obviously a good thing, on its own. However, the devil in the detail is that these kind of benefits only impact in the year they are booked, and are often one-off in nature. In the likely event the tax benefit is not repeated, we'd expect to see its statutory profit levels drop, at least in the absence of strong growth. While we think it's good that the company has booked a tax benefit, it does mean that there's every chance the statutory profit will come in a lot higher than it would be if the income was adjusted for one-off factors.

安德瑪公佈的稅收優惠爲1.09億美元,值得一提。當公司由納稅人支付工資而不是向納稅人付款時,總是有點值得注意的。獲得稅收優惠本身顯然是一件好事。但是,細節上的問題在於,此類福利僅在預訂當年有影響,而且本質上通常是一次性的。如果稅收優惠可能不重演,我們預計其法定利潤水平將下降,至少在沒有強勁增長的情況下是如此。儘管我們認爲公司獲得稅收優惠是件好事,但這確實意味着法定利潤很有可能遠高於根據一次性因素調整收入時的法定利潤。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓你想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看根據他們的估計描繪未來盈利能力的交互式圖表。

Our Take On Under Armour's Profit Performance

我們對安德瑪利潤表現的看法

Under Armour reported that it received a tax benefit, rather than paid tax, in its last report. Given that sort of benefit is not recurring, a focus on the statutory profit might make the company seem better than it really is. Because of this, we think that it may be that Under Armour's statutory profits are better than its underlying earnings power. But the happy news is that, while acknowledging we have to look beyond the statutory numbers, those numbers are still improving, with EPS growing at a very high rate over the last year. Of course, we've only just scratched the surface when it comes to analysing its earnings; one could also consider margins, forecast growth, and return on investment, among other factors. While it's really important to consider how well a company's statutory earnings represent its true earnings power, it's also worth taking a look at what analysts are forecasting for the future. So feel free to check out our free graph representing analyst forecasts.

安德瑪在上一份報告中報告說,它獲得了稅收優惠,而不是納稅。鑑於這種好處不是經常性的,專注於法定利潤可能會使公司看起來比實際情況更好。因此,我們認爲安德瑪的法定利潤可能好於其基礎盈利能力。但令人高興的消息是,儘管承認我們必須將目光投向法定數字之外,但這些數字仍在改善,去年每股收益以非常高的速度增長。當然,我們只是在分析其收益時才浮出水面;人們還可以考慮利潤率、預測增長和投資回報率等因素。儘管考慮公司的法定收益如何代表其真正的盈利能力非常重要,但也值得一看分析師對未來的預測。因此,請隨時查看我們代表分析師預測的免費圖表。

Today we've zoomed in on a single data point to better understand the nature of Under Armour's profit. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying.

今天,我們放大了單個數據點,以更好地了解安德瑪利潤的性質。但是,如果你能夠將注意力集中在細節上,總會有更多的事情需要發現。例如,許多人認爲高股本回報率是有利的商業經濟的標誌,而另一些人則喜歡 “關注資金”,尋找內部人士正在買入的股票。因此,你可能希望看到這份免費收藏的擁有高股本回報率的公司,或者這份內部人士正在購買的股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論