With 3.1% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Selective Insurance Group, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SIGI) 3.6% Stock Price Decline
With 3.1% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Selective Insurance Group, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SIGI) 3.6% Stock Price Decline
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Selective Insurance Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 機構在選擇性保險集團的大量持股意味着它們對該公司的股價具有重大影響
- 共有10名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
- 業內人士最近一直在拋售
A look at the shareholders of Selective Insurance Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:SIGI) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 84% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看選擇性保險集團有限公司(納斯達克股票代碼:SIGI)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。機構擁有84%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 3.6% in value last week. However, the 3.1% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
沒有股東喜歡在投資中蒙受損失,尤其是上週持股價值下降3.6%的機構投資者。但是,3.1%的一年期回報率可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。但是,我們假設他們將來會注意弱點。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Selective Insurance Group, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究選擇性保險集團的每種類型的所有者。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240224/0-c3b2a564799d552b67c451fc30467be0-0-d55a3b97f4e2543e2efd8df43943274b.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Selective Insurance Group?
關於選擇性保險集團,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。
Selective Insurance Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Selective Insurance Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
選擇性保險集團已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到選擇性保險集團的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240224/0-c3b2a564799d552b67c451fc30467be0-1-111174c41fd2b07c705fc36b1d03e87d.png/big)
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Selective Insurance Group is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 13% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 10% of common stock, and FMR LLC holds about 5.8% of the company stock.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。選擇性保險集團不歸對沖基金所有。貝萊德公司目前是最大股東,已發行股份的13%。Vanguard Group, Inc.是第二大股東,擁有10%的普通股,FMR LLC持有該公司約5.8%的股份。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前十名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Selective Insurance Group
選擇性保險集團的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Selective Insurance Group, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$91m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有選擇性保險集團公司的股份。這是一家大公司,因此很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值9100萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 14% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Selective Insurance Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
擁有14%所有權的公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對選擇性保險集團有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得看看究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以在這張詳細圖表中找到歷史收入和收入。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。