share_log

Ferguson Plc's (NYSE:FERG) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 4.3% Over the Past Week

Ferguson Plc's (NYSE:FERG) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 4.3% Over the Past Week

弗格森集團(紐約證券交易所代碼:FERG)的大型機構所有者必須感到高興,因爲股票繼續給人留下深刻印象,過去一週上漲了4.3%
Simply Wall St ·  02/25 09:03

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Ferguson's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 21 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 高機構所有權意味着弗格森的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 前21位股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

A look at the shareholders of Ferguson plc (NYSE:FERG) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 85% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看弗格森集團(紐約證券交易所代碼:FERG)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲85%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$42b in market cap. One-year return to shareholders is currently 49% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週,在該公司的市值達到420億美元之後,機構投資者最終受益最大。目前,一年股東回報率爲49%,上週的漲幅錦上添花。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ferguson, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究弗格森的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:FERG Ownership Breakdown February 25th 2024
紐約證券交易所:FERG 所有權明細 2024 年 2 月 25 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ferguson?

關於弗格森,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Ferguson already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Ferguson's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

弗格森已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看弗格森的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:FERG Earnings and Revenue Growth February 25th 2024
紐約證券交易所:FERG收益和收入增長 2024年2月25日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Ferguson. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 13% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 6.6% of common stock, and FMR LLC holds about 3.6% of the company stock.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。對沖基金在弗格森的股票不多。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其已發行股份爲13%。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有6.6%的普通股,FMR LLC持有該公司約3.6%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 21 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現前21名公司擁有公司50%的總所有權,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重大控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Ferguson

弗格森的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our information suggests that Ferguson plc insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$355m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的信息表明,弗格森公司的內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部人士擁有該公司的很大一部分股份會令人驚訝。儘管他們的持股量不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共擁有價值3.55億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到至少有一部分內部所有權總是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Ferguson. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有弗格森14%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Ferguson .

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。爲此,你應該注意我們在弗格森身上發現的兩個警告信號。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論