share_log

Anker Innovations Limited (SZSE:300866) Insiders Have Significant Skin in the Game With 67% Ownership

Anker Innovations Limited (SZSE:300866) Insiders Have Significant Skin in the Game With 67% Ownership

Anker Innovations Limited(深圳證券交易所代碼:300866)內部人士擁有大量股份,所有權爲67%
Simply Wall St ·  02/26 02:45

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Anker Innovations' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 56% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • 14% of Anker Innovations is held by Institutions
  • Anker Innovations擁有大量的內部所有權,這表明了公司擴張的固有利益
  • 56% 的業務由前兩名股東持有
  • 14% 的 Anker Innovations 由機構持有

Every investor in Anker Innovations Limited (SZSE:300866) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 67% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Anker Innovations Limited(深圳證券交易所代碼:300866)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。個人內部人士持有67%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

With such a notable stake in the company, insiders would be highly incentivised to make value accretive decisions.

由於該公司持有如此可觀的股份,內部人士將極大地激勵他們做出增值決策。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Anker Innovations.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Anker Innovations的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300866 Ownership Breakdown February 26th 2024
SZSE: 300866 所有權明細 2024 年 2 月 26 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Anker Innovations?

關於安克創新,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Anker Innovations already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Anker Innovations' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

Anker Innovations已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Anker Innovations的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300866 Earnings and Revenue Growth February 26th 2024
SZSE: 300866 2024年2月26日收益和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Anker Innovations. Meng Yang is currently the company's largest shareholder with 44% of shares outstanding. With 12% and 4.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, Dongping Zhao and Wenlong Wu are the second and third largest shareholders. Dongping Zhao, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of President.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Anker Innovations進行有意義的投資。孟陽目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的44%。趙東平和吳文龍分別擁有12%和4.3%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。第二大股東趙東平也恰好擁有總裁頭銜。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Anker Innovations

Anker Innovations 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Anker Innovations Limited stock. This gives them a lot of power. Insiders own CN¥22b worth of shares in the CN¥33b company. That's extraordinary! Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to discover if they have been buying or selling.

內部人士似乎擁有Anker Innovations Limited一半以上的股票。這賦予了他們很大的力量。內部人士擁有這家33億元人民幣公司價值220億元人民幣的股份。太不尋常了!大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望了解他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Anker Innovations. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Anker Innovations擁有16%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對Anker Innovations有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Anker Innovations .

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。爲此,你應該注意我們在Anker Innovations中發現的兩個警告信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論