Jun Zhai Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300552) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 23%last Week
Jun Zhai Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300552) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 23%last Week
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significant insider control over Vanjee Technology implies vested interests in company growth
- 51% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 對Vanjee Technology的重大內部控制意味着公司增長中的既得利益
- 51% 的業務由前 2 名股東持有
- 所有權研究與過去的表現數據相結合,可以幫助人們更好地了解股票的機會
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300552), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 54% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制了萬吉科技股份有限公司(深圳證券交易所代碼:300552),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,個別內部人士擁有公司的大部分股份,所有權爲54%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 23% gain.
結果,內部人士是上週23%漲幅的最大受益者。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Vanjee Technology.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Vanjee Technology的哪些信息。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240228/0-f70d2c24caf223bc24aeca69ffc882c2-0-d5769a72bdea6821c78a56a5a832a37c.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Vanjee Technology?
關於Vanjee Technology,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。
Less than 5% of Vanjee Technology is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.
只有不到5%的萬吉科技股份由機構投資者持有。這表明一些基金將目光投向了該公司,但許多基金尚未購買該公司的股票。因此,如果公司本身能夠隨着時間的推移而有所改善,那麼將來我們很可能會看到更多的機構買家。當一些大型機構想同時購買某隻股票時,我們有時會看到股價上漲。你可以在下面看到的收益和收入的歷史可能有助於考慮是否會有更多的機構投資者想要這隻股票。當然,還有很多其他因素需要考慮。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240228/0-f70d2c24caf223bc24aeca69ffc882c2-1-9027b77abe8769cfb84730eca4f3fda1.png/big)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Vanjee Technology. With a 46% stake, CEO Jun Zhai is the largest shareholder. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.0% and 1.8% of the stock. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Lin Yan Tian is also a Member of Corporate Board, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
對沖基金在Vanjee Technology的股票不多。首席執行官翟軍持有46%的股份,是最大股東。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約5.0%和1.8%的股份。有趣的是,第三大股東林燕田也是公司董事會成員,這再次表明公司最大股東擁有強大的內部所有權。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現前兩位股東共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着他們擁有影響公司決策的巨大權力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有一些分析師對這隻股票的報道,但隨着時間的推移,它仍可能變得更加廣爲人知。
Insider Ownership Of Vanjee Technology
萬吉科技的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. So they have a CN¥2.4b stake in this CN¥4.5b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有Vanjee科技有限公司的大部分股份。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決策。因此,他們在這項45億元的業務中擁有24億加元的股份。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望(免費)了解他們是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 41% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司41%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Vanjee Technology you should know about.
儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有它們,我們發現了一個你應該知道的Vanjee Technology的警告信號。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。