share_log

Juewei Food Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603517) Last Week's 10% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake

Juewei Food Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603517) Last Week's 10% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake

覺味食品有限公司's(SHSE: 603517)上週10%的跌幅一定讓持有大量股份的私營公司感到失望
Simply Wall St ·  03/10 20:43

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Juewei Food by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Institutions own 22% of Juewei Food
  • 私營公司對Juewei Food的重大控制意味着公衆擁有更大的權力來影響管理和治理相關決策
  • 共有6位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 機構擁有覺味食品22%的股份

A look at the shareholders of Juewei Food Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603517) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 47% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看覺味食品有限公司(SHSE: 603517)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。私人公司擁有47%的股份,是該公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And following last week's 10% decline in share price, private companies suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌10%之後,私營公司遭受的損失最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Juewei Food.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Juewei Food的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:603517 Ownership Breakdown March 11th 2024
SHSE: 603517 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 11 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Juewei Food?

關於爵味食品,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that Juewei Food does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Juewei Food, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Juewei Food確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看Juewei Food過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:603517 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 11th 2024
SHSE: 603517 2024 年 3 月 11 日收益和收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Juewei Food. Shanghai Jucheng Enterprise Development Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) is currently the company's largest shareholder with 33% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.8% and 3.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

對沖基金在 Juewei Food 的股票不多。上海聚成企業發展合夥企業(有限合夥)目前是公司的最大股東,已發行股份的33%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的7.8%和3.1%。

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前六名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Juewei Food

Juewei Food 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our information suggests that Juewei Food Co., Ltd. insiders own under 1% of the company. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own CN¥101m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的信息表明,覺味食品有限公司內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。但是,內部人士有可能通過更復雜的結構獲得間接利益。這是一家大公司,因此即使是很小的比例權益也可以在董事會和股東之間建立一致。在本案中,內部人士擁有價值1.01億元人民幣的股票。很高興看到董事會成員擁有股票,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 30% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司30%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 47%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司47%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Juewei Food better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Juewei Food has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地了解Juewei Food,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。以風險爲例-Juewei Food 有 2 個警告信號,我們認爲您應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論