share_log

Googol Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301510) Stock Price Dropped 6.7% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

Googol Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301510) Stock Price Dropped 6.7% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

谷歌科技有限公司's (SZSE: 301510) 上週股價下跌6.7%;私營公司不會高興
Simply Wall St ·  03/11 18:49

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Googol Technology indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • The top 5 shareholders own 54% of the company
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 私營公司對Googol Technology的大量所有權表明,它們在管理和業務戰略方面共同擁有更大的發言權
  • 前五名股東擁有公司54%的股份
  • 公司過去的表現以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有一個很好的了解

If you want to know who really controls Googol Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301510), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 43% to be precise, is private companies. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了谷歌科技有限公司(深圳證券交易所代碼:301510),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有該公司股份最多的集團是私營公司,準確地說約爲43%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

As a result, private companies as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥928m.

結果,在市值下降9.28億元人民幣之後,私營公司作爲一個整體承受了最大的損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Googol Technology, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Googol Technology的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:301510 Ownership Breakdown March 11th 2024
SZSE: 301510 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 11 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Googol Technology?

關於Googol技術,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Googol Technology. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Googol Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者持有Googol Technology的大量股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Googol Technology的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:301510 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 11th 2024
SZSE: 301510 收益和收入增長 2024 年 3 月 11 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Googol Technology. Our data shows that Googol Technology (HK) Limited is the largest shareholder with 23% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對谷歌科技進行有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,谷歌科技(香港)有限公司是最大股東,已發行股份的23%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約9.7%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有7.9%的所有權。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 54% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還揭示了這樣一個事實,即公司約有54%的股份由前五名股東控制,這表明這些所有者對業務具有重大影響。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司進行報道,因此它可能處於雷達之下。

Insider Ownership Of Googol Technology

谷歌科技的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Googol Technology Co., Ltd.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own CN¥812m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有谷歌科技有限公司的股份。這是一家大公司,因此很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值8.12億元人民幣的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 29% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司29%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 17%, private equity firms could influence the Googol Technology board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有17%的股份,可能會影響谷歌科技董事會。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 43%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司43%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Googol Technology you should be aware of, and 1 of them is significant.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。一個很好的例子:我們發現了你應該注意的3個谷歌科技警告信號,其中一個信號很重要。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,來看看這份免費的有趣公司名單吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論