Insiders the Biggest Winners as Yangling Metron New Material Inc.'s (SZSE:300861) Market Cap Rises to CN¥14b
Insiders the Biggest Winners as Yangling Metron New Material Inc.'s (SZSE:300861) Market Cap Rises to CN¥14b
Key Insights
主要見解
- Yangling Metron New Material's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- The top 2 shareholders own 62% of the company
- Institutional ownership in Yangling Metron New Material is 12%
- 美暢股份的重要內部持有表明公司擴張存在固有利益。
- 前兩大股東持有該公司62%的股份。
- 美暢股份的機構持股比例爲12%。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Yangling Metron New Material Inc. (SZSE:300861), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 68% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
爲了了解真正控制美暢股份公司的人,了解業務的所有權結構至關重要。擁有最大份額的群體是持有68%所有權的個人內部人員。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將受益最多(如果出現經濟下滑,他們將失去最多)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥14b market cap following a 3.9% gain in the stock.
因此,內部人員作爲中國140億市值美暢股份在上週取得3.9%漲幅時得分最高。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Yangling Metron New Material.
下表中,我們將重點關注美暢股份不同的所有權組。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Yangling Metron New Material?
機構投資者對於美暢股份有何看法?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Yangling Metron New Material already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Yangling Metron New Material's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
美暢股份的股份註冊表上已有機構。實際上,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區具有一定的信譽度。但是,最好不要依賴所謂的機構投資者的驗證。他們也會犯錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變他們對股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看美暢股份以下的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Yangling Metron New Material. The company's largest shareholder is Ying Wu, with ownership of 50%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 13% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.1% by the third-largest shareholder. Haibo Jia, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.
我們注意到對於美暢股份,對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。該公司的最大股東是吳英,持有50%的股份。爲了獲得背景信息,第二大股東持有約13%的流通股,第三大股東持有6.1%的股份。同時,第三大股東賈海波也是董事會成員。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Yangling Metron New Material
美暢股份內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Yangling Metron New Material Inc. stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of CN¥14b, that means insiders have a whopping CN¥9.5b worth of shares in their own names. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.
內部人員擁有美暢股份公司一半以上的股票。這使他們擁有很大的權力。鑑於它的市值約爲140億元人民幣,這意味着內部人員擁有高達95億元人民幣的股票。看到這種投資水平是好的。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人員是否出售了他們的股份。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Yangling Metron New Material. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
佔有20%股份的普通公衆,大多由個人投資者組成,對美暢股份有一定的影響力。雖然這種幾乎四分之一的擁有權是可觀的,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Yangling Metron New Material (1 is significant) that you should be aware of.
我很感興趣看到到底誰擁有公司股份。但是爲了真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了兩個警告標誌(其中一個很重要)值得注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。