Retail Investors Who Hold 59% of Visual China Group Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:000681) Gained 4.2%, Insiders Profited as Well
Retail Investors Who Hold 59% of Visual China Group Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:000681) Gained 4.2%, Insiders Profited as Well
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Visual China GroupLtd's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 25 shareholders own 41% of the company
- Insiders own 33% of Visual China GroupLtd
- Visual China GroupLtd擁有大量散戶投資者的所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響。
- 前25名股東擁有公司41%的股份
- 業內人士擁有視覺中國集團有限公司33%的股份
Every investor in Visual China Group Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:000681) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 59% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
視覺中國集團有限公司的每位投資者, Ltd.(深圳證券交易所代碼:000681)應該知道最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的群體是擁有59%所有權的散戶投資者。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
While retail investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 4.2% price gain, insiders also received a 33% cut.
儘管在上週股價上漲4.2%之後,散戶投資者是獲得最大收益的群體,但內部人士也獲得了33%的下調。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Visual China GroupLtd.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關視覺中國集團有限公司的哪些信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Visual China GroupLtd?
關於視覺中國集團有限公司,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。
We can see that Visual China GroupLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Visual China GroupLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到,Visual China GroupLtd確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Visual China GroupLtd的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多內容。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Visual China GroupLtd. Our data shows that Yurui Wu is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.6% and 5.9% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Jijun Chai is the owner of 4.2% of the company's shares.
對沖基金在視覺中國集團有限公司的股份不多。我們的數據顯示,吳玉瑞是最大股東,已發行股份的11%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約9.6%和5.9%的股份。此外,首席執行官柴繼軍持有公司4.2%的股份。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
在研究我們的所有權數據時,我們發現25位大股東共同擁有的股份不到50%,這意味着沒有一個人擁有多數股權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of Visual China GroupLtd
視覺中國集團有限公司的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Visual China Group Co.,Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥9.8b, and insiders have CN¥3.2b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有視覺中國集團有限公司合理比例的股份。,有限公司。它的市值僅爲98億元人民幣,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值32億元人民幣的股票。這非常重要。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 59% stake in Visual China GroupLtd, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Visual China GroupLtd59%的大量股份,這表明它是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。有了這麼多的所有權,散戶投資者可以在影響股東回報的決策中共同發揮作用,例如股息政策和董事任命。他們還可以對可能不會提高盈利能力的收購或合併行使投票權。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以在這張詳細圖表中找到歷史收入和收入。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。