Qinghua Fang Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301356) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 13%last Week
Qinghua Fang Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301356) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 13%last Week
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 55% ownership
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 浙江天振科技擁有大量內部所有權,表明公司擴張有固有的利益
- 共有2位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲55%
- 公司過去的表現以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有一個很好的了解
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301356), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 68% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制了浙江天振科技股份有限公司(SZSE: 301356),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有68%所有權的個人內部人士。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥406m last week.
顯然,上週該公司的市值上漲了4.06億元人民幣之後,內部人士受益最大。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於浙江天振科技的什麼。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240316/0-78be0fa999ebc43c2fcab53e29386857-0-82e81545cc8fbff2d49055243198a422.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology?
關於浙江天振科技,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。
Institutions have a very small stake in Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.
機構持有浙江天振科技的很小股份。這表明該公司受到一些基金的關注,但目前在專業投資者中並不特別受歡迎。如果該公司正在增加收益,那可能表明它才剛剛開始引起這些財力雄厚的投資者的注意。當一些大型機構想同時購買某隻股票時,我們有時會看到股價上漲。你可以在下面看到的收益和收入的歷史可能有助於考慮是否會有更多的機構投資者想要這隻股票。當然,還有很多其他因素需要考慮。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240316/0-78be0fa999ebc43c2fcab53e29386857-1-c8bd48dc4bc72b48a6752cde3a24452a.png/big)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology. With a 41% stake, CEO Qinghua Fang is the largest shareholder. With 14% and 7.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Caiqin Zhu and Anji Yahua Trading Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) are the second and third largest shareholders.
對沖基金在浙江天振科技的股份不多。首席執行官方清華持有41%的股份,是最大股東。朱彩勤和安吉亞華貿易合夥企業(有限合夥)分別擁有14%和7.5%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現前兩位股東共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着他們擁有影響公司決策的巨大權力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。分析師對該股的報道很少,但報道不多。因此,它還有獲得更多報道的餘地。
Insider Ownership Of Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology
浙江天振科技的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥3.6b, that means they have CN¥2.4b worth of shares. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息表明,內部人士擁有浙江天振科技有限公司一半以上的股份。這使他們能夠有效控制公司。鑑於其市值爲36億元人民幣,這意味着他們擁有價值24億元人民幣的股票。大多數人會認爲這是積極的,顯示出與股東的強烈一致性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 24% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
擁有24%的所有權的普通大衆,主要是個人投資者,對浙江天振科技有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 7.5%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司7.5%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology that you should be aware of before investing here.
儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們發現了浙江天振科技的兩個警告信號,在投資這裏之前,你應該注意這些信號。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。