Private Companies Account for 56% of Empyrean Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301269) Ownership, While Private Equity Firms Account for 17%
Private Companies Account for 56% of Empyrean Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301269) Ownership, While Private Equity Firms Account for 17%
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Empyrean Technology's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Institutions own 15% of Empyrean Technology
- Empyrean Technology擁有大量的私營公司所有權,這表明關鍵決策受到公衆股東的影響
- 共有2位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲52%
- 機構擁有Empyrean Technology15%的股份
If you want to know who really controls Empyrean Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301269), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 56% to be precise, is private companies. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道誰真正控制着Empyrean科技股份有限公司(深圳證券交易所代碼:301269),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有該公司股份最多的集團是私營公司,準確地說約爲56%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
Private equity firms, on the other hand, account for 17% of the company's stockholders.
另一方面,私募股權公司佔公司股東的17%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Empyrean Technology.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Empyrean Technology的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Empyrean Technology?
關於Empyrean技術,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。
We can see that Empyrean Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Empyrean Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到,Empyrean Technology確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Empyrean Technology的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Empyrean Technology. China Electronics Corporation is currently the largest shareholder, with 34% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 18% and 8.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
對沖基金在Empyrean Technology的股票不多。中國電子集團公司目前是最大股東,已發行股份的34%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的18%和8.9%。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 52% stake.
對股東登記冊的更詳細研究表明,前兩名股東通過其52%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of Empyrean Technology
Empyrean Technology 的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.
我們的數據無法證實董事會成員親自持有股份。並非所有司法管轄區在披露內部所有權方面都有相同的規則,我們有可能在這裏遺漏了一些東西。因此,您可以單擊此處了解有關首席執行官的更多信息。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 10% stake in Empyrean Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Empyrean Technology10%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股權所有權
Private equity firms hold a 17% stake in Empyrean Technology. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
私募股權公司持有Empyrean Technology17%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 56%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司56%的股份。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Empyrean Technology you should be aware of.
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。一個很好的例子:我們發現了一個你應該注意的Empyrean Technology的警告信號。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。