Shareholders Can Be Confident That Ciena's (NYSE:CIEN) Earnings Are High Quality
Shareholders Can Be Confident That Ciena's (NYSE:CIEN) Earnings Are High Quality
Investors were underwhelmed by the solid earnings posted by Ciena Corporation (NYSE:CIEN) recently. We did some digging and actually think they are being unnecessarily pessimistic.
Ciena公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:CIEN)最近公佈的穩健收益令投資者不知所措。我們進行了一些挖掘,實際上認爲他們過於悲觀。
Examining Cashflow Against Ciena's Earnings
根據Ciena的收益研究現金流
In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.
在高級財務中,用於衡量公司將報告的利潤轉換爲自由現金流(FCF)的關鍵比率是應計比率(來自現金流)。爲了獲得應計比率,我們首先從一段時期的利潤中減去FCF,然後將該數字除以該期間的平均運營資產。該比率向我們顯示了公司的利潤超過其FCF的程度。
Therefore, it's actually considered a good thing when a company has a negative accrual ratio, but a bad thing if its accrual ratio is positive. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".
因此,當公司的應計比率爲負時,這實際上被認爲是一件好事,但如果其應計比率爲正,則是一件壞事。雖然正應計比率表明非現金利潤達到一定水平不是問題,但高應計比率可以說是一件壞事,因爲它表明紙面利潤與現金流不匹配。引用Lewellen和Resutek在2014年發表的一篇論文,“應計額較高的公司將來的利潤往往會降低”。
Over the twelve months to January 2024, Ciena recorded an accrual ratio of -0.12. That implies it has good cash conversion, and implies that its free cash flow solidly exceeded its profit last year. To wit, it produced free cash flow of US$607m during the period, dwarfing its reported profit of US$228.1m. Given that Ciena had negative free cash flow in the prior corresponding period, the trailing twelve month resul of US$607m would seem to be a step in the right direction.
在截至2024年1月的十二個月中,Ciena的應計比率爲-0.12。這意味着它具有良好的現金轉化率,也意味着其去年的自由現金流穩步超過了利潤。換句話說,它在此期間產生了6.07億美元的自由現金流,使其報告的2.281億美元利潤相形見絀。鑑於Ciena在前一同期的自由現金流爲負,過去十二個月的6.07億美元業績似乎是朝着正確方向邁出的一步。
That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.
這可能會讓你想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看根據他們的估計描繪未來盈利能力的交互式圖表。
Our Take On Ciena's Profit Performance
我們對Ciena盈利表現的看法
Ciena's accrual ratio is solid, and indicates strong free cash flow, as we discussed, above. Because of this, we think Ciena's earnings potential is at least as good as it seems, and maybe even better! And on top of that, its earnings per share increased by 26% in the last year. At the end of the day, it's essential to consider more than just the factors above, if you want to understand the company properly. While it's really important to consider how well a company's statutory earnings represent its true earnings power, it's also worth taking a look at what analysts are forecasting for the future. So feel free to check out our free graph representing analyst forecasts.
正如我們在上面討論的那樣,Ciena的應計比率很穩定,表明自由現金流強勁。因此,我們認爲Ciena的盈利潛力至少和看起來一樣好,甚至可能更好!最重要的是,其每股收益在去年增長了26%。歸根結底,如果你想正確地了解公司,必須考慮的不僅僅是上述因素。儘管考慮公司的法定收益如何代表其真正的盈利能力非常重要,但也值得一看分析師對未來的預測。因此,請隨時查看我們代表分析師預測的免費圖表。
This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Ciena's profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying.
這份報告只研究了揭示Ciena利潤性質的單一因素。但是,還有很多其他方法可以讓你對公司的看法。例如,許多人認爲高股本回報率是有利的商業經濟的標誌,而另一些人則喜歡 “關注資金”,尋找內部人士正在買入的股票。因此,你可能希望看到這份免費收藏的擁有高股本回報率的公司,或者這份內部人士正在購買的股票清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。