This Albany International Insider Reduced Their Stake By 36%
This Albany International Insider Reduced Their Stake By 36%
Viewing insider transactions for Albany International Corp.'s (NYSE:AIN ) over the last year, we see that insiders were net sellers. This means that a larger number of shares were sold by insiders in relation to shares purchased.
查看奧爾巴尼國際公司的內幕交易's(紐約證券交易所代碼:AIN)在過去的一年中,我們看到內部人士是淨賣家。這意味着與購買的股票相比,內部人士出售的股票數量更多。
Although we don't think shareholders should simply follow insider transactions, logic dictates you should pay some attention to whether insiders are buying or selling shares.
儘管我們認爲股東不應該簡單地關注內幕交易,但邏輯要求你應該注意內部人士是在買入還是賣出股票。
Albany International Insider Transactions Over The Last Year
去年的奧爾巴尼國際內幕交易
The Senior VP & CTO, Robert Hansen, made the biggest insider sale in the last 12 months. That single transaction was for US$390k worth of shares at a price of US$93.60 each. That means that an insider was selling shares at below the current price (US$94.77). As a general rule we consider it to be discouraging when insiders are selling below the current price, because it suggests they were happy with a lower valuation. However, while insider selling is sometimes discouraging, it's only a weak signal. This single sale was just 36% of Robert Hansen's stake. The only individual insider seller over the last year was Robert Hansen.
高級副總裁兼首席技術官羅伯特·漢森進行了過去12個月中最大規模的內幕交易。這筆單筆交易是價值39萬美元的股票,每股價格爲93.60美元。這意味着一位內部人士正在以低於當前價格(94.77美元)的價格出售股票。通常,當內部人士以低於當前價格的價格出售時,我們認爲這令人沮喪,因爲這表明他們對較低的估值感到滿意。但是,儘管內幕銷售有時令人沮喪,但這只是一個微弱的信號。此次出售僅佔羅伯特·漢森股份的36%。去年唯一的個人內幕賣家是羅伯特·漢森。
You can see the insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last year depicted in the chart below. By clicking on the graph below, you can see the precise details of each insider transaction!
您可以看到下圖所示的去年的內幕交易(公司和個人)。通過點擊下面的圖表,你可以看到每筆內幕交易的確切細節!
If you like to buy stocks that insiders are buying, rather than selling, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: insiders have been buying them).
如果你喜歡買內部人士買入而不是賣出的股票,那麼你可能會喜歡這份免費的公司名單。(提示:業內人士一直在購買它們)。
Insider Ownership
內部所有權
Another way to test the alignment between the leaders of a company and other shareholders is to look at how many shares they own. Usually, the higher the insider ownership, the more likely it is that insiders will be incentivised to build the company for the long term. It appears that Albany International insiders own 1.0% of the company, worth about US$30m. While this is a strong but not outstanding level of insider ownership, it's enough to indicate some alignment between management and smaller shareholders.
測試公司領導者與其他股東之間一致性的另一種方法是查看他們擁有多少股份。通常,內部人士的所有權越高,內部人士長期建立公司的可能性就越大。看來奧爾巴尼國際內部人士擁有該公司1.0%的股份,價值約3000萬美元。儘管這是一個強勁但並不突出的內部所有權水平,但這足以表明管理層與小型股東之間有一定的一致性。
What Might The Insider Transactions At Albany International Tell Us?
奧爾巴尼國際的內幕交易可能告訴我們什麼?
It doesn't really mean much that no insider has traded Albany International shares in the last quarter. We don't take much encouragement from the transactions by Albany International insiders. But it's good to see that insiders own shares in the company. Therefore, you should definitely take a look at this FREE report showing analyst forecasts for Albany International.
上個季度沒有內部人士交易過奧爾巴尼國際的股票,這並不意味着什麼。我們並沒有從奧爾巴尼國際內部人士的交易中得到太多鼓勵。但很高興看到內部人士擁有該公司的股份。因此,你一定要看看這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師對奧爾巴尼國際的預測。
If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.
如果你想看看另一家公司——一家財務狀況可能優越的公司——那麼千萬不要錯過這份免費的股本回報率高、債務低的有趣公司的名單。
For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests.
就本文而言,內部人士是指向相關監管機構報告其交易的個人。我們目前只考慮公開市場交易和私下處置的直接利益,不包括衍生品交易或間接權益。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。