Even After Rising 5.1% This Past Week, Studio City International Holdings (NYSE:MSC) Shareholders Are Still Down 57% Over the Past Five Years
Even After Rising 5.1% This Past Week, Studio City International Holdings (NYSE:MSC) Shareholders Are Still Down 57% Over the Past Five Years
Generally speaking long term investing is the way to go. But along the way some stocks are going to perform badly. For example the Studio City International Holdings Limited (NYSE:MSC) share price dropped 57% over five years. We certainly feel for shareholders who bought near the top.
一般而言,長期投資是必經之路。但在此過程中,一些股票將表現不佳。例如,影視城國際控股有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:MSC)的股價在五年內下跌了57%。對於在接近頂部買入的股東,我們當然有同感。
Although the past week has been more reassuring for shareholders, they're still in the red over the last five years, so let's see if the underlying business has been responsible for the decline.
儘管過去一週令股東更加放心,但在過去五年中,他們仍處於虧損狀態,所以讓我們看看基礎業務是否是造成下降的原因。
Studio City International Holdings isn't currently profitable, so most analysts would look to revenue growth to get an idea of how fast the underlying business is growing. Shareholders of unprofitable companies usually expect strong revenue growth. That's because fast revenue growth can be easily extrapolated to forecast profits, often of considerable size.
Studio City International Holdings目前尚未盈利,因此大多數分析師會着眼於收入的增長,以了解基礎業務的增長速度。無利可圖的公司的股東通常期望強勁的收入增長。這是因爲快速的收入增長可以很容易地推斷出來預測利潤,通常規模相當大。
Over half a decade Studio City International Holdings reduced its trailing twelve month revenue by 36% for each year. That's definitely a weaker result than most pre-profit companies report. Arguably, the market has responded appropriately to this business performance by sending the share price down 9% (annualized) in the same time period. We don't generally like to own companies that lose money and don't grow revenues. You might be better off spending your money on a leisure activity. This looks like a really risky stock to buy, at a glance.
在過去的五年中,Studio City International Holdings將其過去十二個月的收入每年減少36%。這絕對比大多數盈利前公司報告的結果要差。可以說,市場對這一業務表現做出了適當的反應,使股價在同一時期下跌了9%(按年計算)。我們通常不喜歡擁有虧損且收入不增長的公司。你最好把錢花在休閒活動上。一目瞭然,這看起來像是一隻非常有風險的股票。
The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).
下圖描述了收入和收入隨時間推移而發生的變化(點擊圖片即可顯示確切的數值)。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240323/0-fae8241c3e2a1a8a40fecda730417517-0-af972bd4ff9d8d2396a6c48a10c997b1.png/big)
Balance sheet strength is crucial. It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on how its financial position has changed over time.
資產負債表的強度至關重要。可能值得一看我們關於其財務狀況如何隨着時間的推移而變化的免費報告。
A Different Perspective
不同的視角
Studio City International Holdings shareholders gained a total return of 10% during the year. But that was short of the market average. On the bright side, that's still a gain, and it is certainly better than the yearly loss of about 9% endured over half a decade. It could well be that the business is stabilizing. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Studio City International Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Studio City International Holdings you should know about.
影視城國際控股的股東在年內獲得了10%的總回報。但這低於市場平均水平。好的一面是,這仍然是一個收益,而且肯定比五年來每年遭受的約9%的損失要好。很可能是業務正在穩定下來。長期跟蹤股價表現總是很有意思的。但是,爲了更好地了解影視城國際控股公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有它們,我們發現了兩個你應該知道的 Studio City International Holdings 警告標誌。
If you are like me, then you will not want to miss this free list of growing companies that insiders are buying.
如果你像我一樣,那麼你不會想錯過這份業內人士正在收購的成長型公司的免費名單。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。