RadNet, Inc. (NASDAQ:RDNT) Delivered A Weaker ROE Than Its Industry
RadNet, Inc. (NASDAQ:RDNT) Delivered A Weaker ROE Than Its Industry
While some investors are already well versed in financial metrics (hat tip), this article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE) and why it is important. We'll use ROE to examine RadNet, Inc. (NASDAQ:RDNT), by way of a worked example.
儘管一些投資者已經精通財務指標(帽子提示),但本文適用於那些想了解股本回報率(ROE)及其重要性的人。舉一個有效的例子,我們將使用投資回報率來研究RadNet公司(納斯達克股票代碼:RDNT)。
Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. In other words, it is a profitability ratio which measures the rate of return on the capital provided by the company's shareholders.
股本回報率或投資回報率是用於評估公司管理層利用公司資本效率的關鍵指標。換句話說,它是衡量公司股東提供的資本回報率的盈利比率。
How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?
你如何計算股本回報率?
The formula for ROE is:
ROE 的公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股本回報率 = 淨利潤(來自持續經營業務)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for RadNet is:
因此,根據上述公式,RadNet的投資回報率爲:
3.7% = US$30m ÷ US$813m (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2023).
3.7% = 3000萬美元 ÷ 8.13億美元(基於截至2023年12月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.04 in profit.
“回報” 是過去十二個月的稅後收入。將其概念化的一種方法是,公司每擁有1美元的股東資本,就能獲得0.04美元的利潤。
Does RadNet Have A Good Return On Equity?
RadNet 的股本回報率是否良好?
By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. As shown in the graphic below, RadNet has a lower ROE than the average (12%) in the Healthcare industry classification.
通過將公司的投資回報率與其行業平均水平進行比較,我們可以快速衡量其表現如何。重要的是,這遠非一個完美的衡量標準,因爲各公司在相同的行業分類中差異很大。如下圖所示,RadNet的投資回報率低於醫療保健行業分類中的平均水平(12%)。
That's not what we like to see. Although, we think that a lower ROE could still mean that a company has the opportunity to better its returns with the use of leverage, provided its existing debt levels are low. A company with high debt levels and low ROE is a combination we like to avoid given the risk involved. Our risks dashboard should have the 3 risks we have identified for RadNet.
這不是我們喜歡看到的。但是,我們認爲,只要現有債務水平較低,較低的投資回報率仍可能意味着公司有機會通過使用槓桿提高回報。鑑於所涉及的風險,高債務水平和低投資回報率的公司是我們希望避免的組合。我們的風險儀表板應包含我們爲RadNet確定的3種風險。
Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE
爲什麼在考慮投資回報率時應該考慮債務
Companies usually need to invest money to grow their profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. In this manner the use of debt will boost ROE, even though the core economics of the business stay the same.
公司通常需要投資資金來增加利潤。投資現金可以來自上一年的利潤(留存收益)、發行新股或借款。在第一和第二種情況下,投資回報率將反映現金用於企業投資的情況。在後一種情況下,用於增長的債務將提高回報,但不會影響總資產。以這種方式,債務的使用將提高投資回報率,儘管該業務的核心經濟學保持不變。
RadNet's Debt And Its 3.7% ROE
RadNet的債務及其3.7%的投資回報率
RadNet does use a high amount of debt to increase returns. It has a debt to equity ratio of 1.02. The combination of a rather low ROE and significant use of debt is not particularly appealing. Investors should think carefully about how a company might perform if it was unable to borrow so easily, because credit markets do change over time.
RadNet確實使用大量債務來增加回報。它的負債權益比率爲1.02。相當低的投資回報率和大量使用債務相結合並不是特別有吸引力。投資者應該仔細考慮如果一家公司無法如此輕易地借款,其表現會如何,因爲信貸市場確實會隨着時間的推移而發生變化。
Conclusion
結論
Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. In our books, the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.
股本回報率對於比較不同業務的質量很有用。在我們的賬簿中,儘管債務很低,但質量最高的公司的股本回報率卻很高。如果兩家公司的投資回報率相同,那麼我通常更喜歡負債較少的公司。
Having said that, while ROE is a useful indicator of business quality, you'll have to look at a whole range of factors to determine the right price to buy a stock. The rate at which profits are likely to grow, relative to the expectations of profit growth reflected in the current price, must be considered, too. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
話雖如此,儘管投資回報率是衡量業務質量的有用指標,但您必須考慮一系列因素才能確定購買股票的正確價格。相對於當前價格所反映的利潤增長預期,還必須考慮利潤可能的增長速度。因此,我認爲可能值得查看這份關於分析師對公司的預測的免費報告。
Of course RadNet may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of other companies that have high ROE and low debt.
當然,RadNet可能不是最值得購買的股票。因此,您不妨免費查看其他投資回報率高、負債率低的公司的名單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。