share_log

PPL (NYSE:PPL) May Have Issues Allocating Its Capital

PPL (NYSE:PPL) May Have Issues Allocating Its Capital

PPL(紐約證券交易所代碼:PPL)可能在分配資本時遇到問題
Simply Wall St ·  03/24 13:56

What financial metrics can indicate to us that a company is maturing or even in decline? More often than not, we'll see a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) and a declining amount of capital employed. Basically the company is earning less on its investments and it is also reducing its total assets. In light of that, from a first glance at PPL (NYSE:PPL), we've spotted some signs that it could be struggling, so let's investigate.

哪些財務指標可以向我們表明一家公司正在成熟甚至衰落?通常,我們會看到下降 返回 論資本使用率(ROCE)和下降情況 金額 所用資本的比例。基本上,該公司的投資收入減少了,而且總資產也在減少。有鑑於此,乍一看PPL(紐約證券交易所代碼:PPL),我們發現了一些可能陷入困境的跡象,所以讓我們來調查一下。

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?

資本使用回報率(ROCE):這是什麼?

For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for PPL:

對於那些不知道的人來說,ROCE是衡量公司年度稅前利潤(其回報率)的指標,相對於該業務使用的資本。分析師使用以下公式來計算PPL:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

已動用資本回報率 = 息稅前收益 (EBIT) ¥(總資產-流動負債)

0.05 = US$1.8b ÷ (US$39b - US$3.3b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2023).

0.05 = 18億美元 ÷(390億美元-33億美元) (基於截至2023年12月的過去十二個月)

So, PPL has an ROCE of 5.0%. On its own that's a low return on capital but it's in line with the industry's average returns of 4.6%.

因此,PPL的投資回報率爲5.0%。這本身就是很低的資本回報率,但與該行業4.6%的平均回報率一致。

roce
NYSE:PPL Return on Capital Employed March 24th 2024
紐約證券交易所:PPL 2024年3月24日動用資本回報率

Above you can see how the current ROCE for PPL compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering PPL for free.

上面你可以看到PPL當前的投資回報率與其先前的資本回報率相比如何,但從過去可以看出來的只有那麼多。如果你願意,你可以免費查看分析師對PPL的預測。

What Does the ROCE Trend For PPL Tell Us?

人們的投資回報率趨勢告訴我們什麼?

We are a bit worried about the trend of returns on capital at PPL. Unfortunately the returns on capital have diminished from the 8.0% that they were earning five years ago. On top of that, it's worth noting that the amount of capital employed within the business has remained relatively steady. This combination can be indicative of a mature business that still has areas to deploy capital, but the returns received aren't as high due potentially to new competition or smaller margins. If these trends continue, we wouldn't expect PPL to turn into a multi-bagger.

我們對PPL的資本回報率趨勢有些擔憂。不幸的是,資本回報率已從五年前的8.0%有所下降。最重要的是,值得注意的是,企業內部使用的資本量一直保持相對穩定。這種組合可能表明一家成熟的企業仍有資金部署的領域,但由於新的競爭或利潤率降低,獲得的回報並不那麼高。如果這些趨勢繼續下去,我們預計PPL不會變成一個多口袋。

The Key Takeaway

關鍵要點

All in all, the lower returns from the same amount of capital employed aren't exactly signs of a compounding machine. Despite the concerning underlying trends, the stock has actually gained 7.5% over the last five years, so it might be that the investors are expecting the trends to reverse. Regardless, we don't like the trends as they are and if they persist, we think you might find better investments elsewhere.

總而言之,使用相同數量的資本所產生的較低迴報並不完全是複利機器的跡象。儘管潛在趨勢令人擔憂,但該股在過去五年中實際上上漲了7.5%,因此投資者可能預計趨勢將逆轉。無論如何,我們不喜歡當前的趨勢,如果趨勢持續下去,我們認爲您可能會在其他地方找到更好的投資。

On a final note, we found 3 warning signs for PPL (2 can't be ignored) you should be aware of.

最後,我們發現了你應該注意的 3 個 PPL 警告信號(2 個不容忽視)。

If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.

如果你想尋找收益豐厚的穩健公司,可以免費查看這份資產負債表良好且股本回報率可觀的公司名單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論