How Did Constellation Brands, Inc.'s (NYSE:STZ) 16% ROE Fare Against The Industry?
How Did Constellation Brands, Inc.'s (NYSE:STZ) 16% ROE Fare Against The Industry?
Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand Constellation Brands, Inc. (NYSE:STZ).
許多投資者仍在學習分析股票時可能有用的各種指標。本文適用於那些想了解股本回報率(ROE)的人。爲了使課程以實用爲基礎,我們將使用投資回報率來更好地了解星座品牌公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:STZ)。
Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. In other words, it is a profitability ratio which measures the rate of return on the capital provided by the company's shareholders.
股本回報率或投資回報率是股東需要考慮的重要因素,因爲它可以告訴他們資本再投資的有效性。換句話說,它是衡量公司股東提供的資本回報率的盈利比率。
How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?
你如何計算股本回報率?
The formula for ROE is:
ROE 的公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股本回報率 = 淨利潤(來自持續經營業務)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Constellation Brands is:
因此,根據上述公式,星座品牌的投資回報率爲:
16% = US$1.6b ÷ US$9.8b (Based on the trailing twelve months to November 2023).
16% = 16億美元 ÷ 98億美元(基於截至2023年11月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the yearly profit. Another way to think of that is that for every $1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn $0.16 in profit.
“回報” 是每年的利潤。另一種思考方式是,每持有價值1美元的股權,該公司就能獲得0.16美元的利潤。
Does Constellation Brands Have A Good Return On Equity?
星座品牌的股本回報率是否良好?
Arguably the easiest way to assess company's ROE is to compare it with the average in its industry. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. You can see in the graphic below that Constellation Brands has an ROE that is fairly close to the average for the Beverage industry (18%).
可以說,評估公司投資回報率的最簡單方法是將其與行業平均水平進行比較。重要的是,這遠非一個完美的衡量標準,因爲各公司在相同的行業分類中差異很大。你可以在下圖中看到,Constellation Brands的投資回報率與飲料行業的平均水平(18%)相當接近。
That isn't amazing, but it is respectable. Even if the ROE is respectable when compared to the industry, its worth checking if the firm's ROE is being aided by high debt levels. If so, this increases its exposure to financial risk.
這並不奇怪,但值得尊敬。即使與行業相比,投資回報率可觀,也值得檢查一下公司的投資回報率是否受到高額債務水平的支撐。如果是這樣,這會增加其金融風險敞口。
How Does Debt Impact ROE?
債務如何影響投資回報率?
Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. That cash can come from retained earnings, issuing new shares (equity), or debt. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the debt required for growth will boost returns, but will not impact the shareholders' equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.
大多數公司需要來自某個地方的資金來增加利潤。這些現金可以來自留存收益、發行新股(股權)或債務。在第一和第二種情況下,投資回報率將反映現金用於企業投資的這種用途。在後一種情況下,增長所需的債務將提高回報,但不會影響股東權益。這將使投資回報率看起來比不使用債務時更好。
Constellation Brands' Debt And Its 16% ROE
星座品牌的債務及其16%的投資回報率
It's worth noting the high use of debt by Constellation Brands, leading to its debt to equity ratio of 1.19. While its ROE is pretty respectable, the amount of debt the company is carrying currently is not ideal. Investors should think carefully about how a company might perform if it was unable to borrow so easily, because credit markets do change over time.
值得注意的是,Constellation Brands大量使用債務,導致其負債權益比率爲1.19。儘管其投資回報率相當可觀,但該公司目前的債務額並不理想。投資者應該仔細考慮如果一家公司無法如此輕易地借款,其表現會如何,因爲信貸市場確實會隨着時間的推移而發生變化。
Conclusion
結論
Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.
股本回報率對於比較不同業務的質量很有用。能夠在不負債過多的情況下獲得高股本回報的公司通常質量很好。如果兩家公司的投資回報率相同,那麼我通常更喜歡負債較少的公司。
But ROE is just one piece of a bigger puzzle, since high quality businesses often trade on high multiples of earnings. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
但是,投資回報率只是更大難題中的一部分,因爲高質量的企業通常以較高的收益倍數進行交易。重要的是要考慮其他因素,例如未來的利潤增長以及未來需要多少投資。因此,我認爲可能值得查看這份關於分析師對公司的預測的免費報告。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,通過尋找其他地方,你可能會找到一筆不錯的投資。因此,來看看這份有趣的公司的免費清單吧。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。