Is Partners Value Investments LP (CVE:PVF.UN) Popular Amongst Insiders?
Is Partners Value Investments LP (CVE:PVF.UN) Popular Amongst Insiders?
The big shareholder groups in Partners Value Investments LP (CVE:PVF.UN) have power over the company. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. I quite like to see at least a little bit of insider ownership. As Charlie Munger said 'Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.
Partners Value Investments LP(CVE:PVF.UN)的大股東集團對公司擁有控制權。機構通常持有較成熟公司的股票,而內部人士擁有相當一部分較小公司的情況並不少見。我非常希望看到至少有一點內部人持股。正如查理·芒格(Charlie Munger)所説,“給我看動機,我就會告訴你結果。”
With a market capitalization of CA$3.7b, Partners Value Investments is a decent size, so it is probably on the radar of institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions are not on the share registry. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Partners Value Investments.
Partner Value Investments的市值為37億加元,規模可觀,因此可能受到機構投資者的關注。下面我們對公司所有權的分析表明,機構不在股票登記處。讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於Partner Value Investments的哪些信息。
Check out our latest analysis for Partners Value InvestmentsTSXV:PVF.UN Ownership Breakdown February 1st 2021What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Partners Value Investments?
查看我們對合作夥伴價值投資的最新分析TSXV:PVF.聯合國所有權明細2021年2月1日關於合夥人價值投資,機構所有權的缺失告訴了我們什麼?
We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.
我們不傾向於看到機構投資者持有風險很高、交易清淡或規模很小的公司的股票。雖然我們有時確實會看到大公司沒有登記在冊的機構,但這種情況並不特別常見。
There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Partners Value Investments' earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.TSXV:PVF.UN Earnings and Revenue Growth February 1st 2021
對於機構為何不持有股票,有多種解釋。最常見的是,相對於管理下的資金,該公司規模太小,因此該機構不願費心密切關注該公司。或者,該公司可能有某些方面讓機構投資者望而卻步。合作伙伴價值投資公司的收益和收入記錄(見下文)可能對機構投資者沒有説服力--或者他們可能只是沒有仔細觀察過業務。TSXV:PVF.UN收益和收入增長2021年2月1日
Partners Value Investments is not owned by hedge funds. Partners Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 50% of shares outstanding. With 5.0% and 2.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, Samuel Pollock and Partners (III) Limited are the second and third largest shareholders.
Partner Value Investments不屬於對衝基金。Partner Limited目前是該公司的最大股東,持有50%的流通股。Samuel Pollock and Partners(III)Limited分別佔已發行股份的5.0%和2.7%,是第二和第三大股東。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 55% stake.
對股東登記的更詳細的研究表明,兩個最大的股東通過他們55%的股份在公司擁有相當大的所有權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.Insider Ownership Of Partners Value Investments
研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的效果。目前我們沒有得到任何分析師對該股的報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。合夥人價值投資的內部人持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
不同國家對內部人的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算數的。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,經理人擔任執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官的話。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認為內部人持股是積極的,因為這可以表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。然而,在某些情況下,太多的權力集中在這個羣體中。
We can see that insiders own shares in Partners Value Investments LP. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth CA$187m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.General Public Ownership
我們可以看到,內部人士持有Partners Value Investments LP的股份。內部人士持有價值1.87億加元的可觀股份。大多數人會認為這是一個真正的積極因素。很高興看到內部人士的投資達到這樣的水平。你可以查看這裏,看看那些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。一般公有制
The general public holds a 42% stake in Partners Value Investments. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.Private Company Ownership
公眾持有Partner Value Investments 42%的股份。雖然這個羣體不一定能發號施令,但它肯定能對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。私營公司所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 53%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.Next Steps:
我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有該公司53%的股份。也許有必要對此進行更深入的研究。如果相關方,如內部人士,對一在這些私營公司中,這一點應該在年報中披露。私營公司也可能對該公司擁有戰略利益。接下來的步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。
Many find it usefulto take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access thisdetailed graphof past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
許多人認為它很有用。要深入瞭解一家公司過去的表現。您可以訪問此詳細圖表過去的收益、收入和現金流。
Of coursethis may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see ourfreecollection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然了這可能不是最值得買的股票。。因此,您可能希望看到我們的免費令人感興趣的潛在客户集合,擁有有利的財務狀況。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年年報數據不一致。
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
這篇由《華爾街日報》撰寫的文章本質上是籠統的。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。簡單地説,華爾街在提到的任何股票中都沒有頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content?Get in touchwith us directly.Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯團隊發電子郵件,地址是simplywallst.com。