share_log

Netac Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300042) Market Cap Dropped CN¥449m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt

Netac Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300042) Market Cap Dropped CN¥449m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt

Netac 科技有限公司's (SZSE: 300042) 上週市值下降了4.49億元人民幣;個人投資者首當其衝
Simply Wall St ·  04/10 18:50

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Netac Technology's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 18 investors have a majority stake in the company with 42% ownership
  • Insider ownership in Netac Technology is 12%
  • Netac Technology擁有大量個人投資者的所有權,這表明關鍵決策受到廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 共有18名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲42%
  • Netac Technology的內部所有權爲12%

If you want to know who really controls Netac Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300042), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 58% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了Netac科技股份有限公司(深圳證券交易所代碼:300042),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有公司的大部分股份,所有權爲58%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And following last week's 8.1% decline in share price, individual investors suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌8.1%之後,個人投資者遭受的損失最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Netac Technology.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Netac Technology的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300042 Ownership Breakdown April 10th 2024
SZSE: 300042 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 10 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Netac Technology?

關於Netac技術,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Institutions have a very small stake in Netac Technology. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.

機構在Netac Technology中持有很小的股份。這表明該公司受到一些基金的關注,但目前在專業投資者中並不特別受歡迎。如果業務從此變得更加強大,我們可能會看到更多機構熱衷於收購的情況。當多個機構投資者想要購買股票時,我們經常會看到股價上漲。過去的收入軌跡(如下所示)可以預示未來的增長,但無法保證。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300042 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 10th 2024
SZSE: 300042 2024年4月10日收益和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Netac Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Shaoguan Jinye Development Co., Ltd. with 25% of shares outstanding. With 9.2% and 2.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Guoshun Deng and Golden Eagle Asset Management Co. Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Netac Technology進行有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是韶關金業發展有限公司,其已發行股份的25%。鄧國順和金鷹資產管理有限公司分別持有9.2%和2.5%的已發行股份Ltd. 是第二和第三大股東。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 18 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我們的所有權數據時,我們發現18位最大股東共同擁有的股份登記冊不到50%,這意味着沒有一個人擁有多數股權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。分析師對該股的報道很少,但報道不多。因此,它還有獲得更多報道的餘地。

Insider Ownership Of Netac Technology

Netac Technology 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Netac Technology Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥5.1b, and insiders have CN¥630m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有Netac科技有限公司合理比例的股份。它的市值僅爲51億元人民幣,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值6.3億元人民幣的股票。我們可以說這表明了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然很小;一些內部人士可能已經創立了該公司。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 58% stake in Netac Technology, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Netac Technology58%的大量股份,這表明Netac Technology是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。有了這麼多的所有權,散戶投資者可以在影響股東回報的決策中共同發揮作用,例如股息政策和董事任命。他們還可以行使權力,對可能不會提高盈利能力的收購或合併進行投票。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 26%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司26%的股份。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過持有私營公司的股權而對上市公司感興趣,而不是以個人身份獲得權益。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的中風結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個有待進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Netac Technology , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,以永遠存在的投資風險幽靈爲例。我們已經確定了Netac Technology的1個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論