share_log

After the Recent Decline, Shanghai Sunglow Packaging Technology Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603499) CEO Jian Jun Dong's Holdings Have Lost 16% of Their Value

After the Recent Decline, Shanghai Sunglow Packaging Technology Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603499) CEO Jian Jun Dong's Holdings Have Lost 16% of Their Value

在經歷了近期的下跌之後,上海陽光包裝科技股份有限公司, Ltd(上海證券交易所代碼:603499)首席執行官董建軍的持股已損失了16%的價值
Simply Wall St ·  04/15 18:07

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Shanghai Sunglow Packaging TechnologyLtd's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • The top 2 shareholders own 57% of the company
  • Institutions own 15% of Shanghai Sunglow Packaging TechnologyLtd
  • 上海陽光包裝科技有限公司的重大內部所有權表明公司擴張的固有利益
  • 前兩名股東擁有公司57%的股份
  • 機構擁有上海陽光包裝科技有限公司15%的股份

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shanghai Sunglow Packaging Technology Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603499), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 54% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

了解誰真正控制了上海日光包裝科技有限公司, Ltd(上海證券交易所代碼:603499),了解企業的所有權結構很重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有54%所有權的個人內部人士。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by CN¥722m.

結果,在市值下降7.22億元人民幣之後,內部人士整體遭受了最大的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shanghai Sunglow Packaging TechnologyLtd.

在下圖中,我們放大了上海陽光包裝科技有限公司的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:603499 Ownership Breakdown April 15th 2024
SHSE: 603499 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 15 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Sunglow Packaging TechnologyLtd?

關於上海陽光包裝技術有限公司,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

Shanghai Sunglow Packaging TechnologyLtd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Shanghai Sunglow Packaging TechnologyLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

上海陽光包裝科技有限公司已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到上海陽光包裝科技有限公司的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:603499 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 15th 2024
SHSE: 603499 2024 年 4 月 15 日收益和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shanghai Sunglow Packaging TechnologyLtd. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Jian Jun Dong with 49% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.2% and 5.6% of the stock.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對上海陽光包裝科技有限公司進行有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大股東是首席執行官董建軍,已發行股份的49%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約8.2%和5.6%的股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司進行報道,因此它可能處於雷達之下。

Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Sunglow Packaging TechnologyLtd

上海日光包裝科技有限公司的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Shanghai Sunglow Packaging Technology Co.,Ltd stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means they own CN¥2.4b worth of shares in the CN¥4.4b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

看來內部人士擁有上海陽光包裝科技有限公司一半以上的股份。, Ltd 股票這賦予了他們很大的力量。這意味着他們擁有這家44億元人民幣公司價值24億元人民幣的股份。這很有意義。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望(免費)了解他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 27% stake in Shanghai Sunglow Packaging TechnologyLtd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有上海陽光包裝科技有限公司27%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Shanghai Sunglow Packaging TechnologyLtd better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for Shanghai Sunglow Packaging TechnologyLtd (2 can't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地了解上海陽光包裝科技有限公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了上海陽光包裝科技有限公司的 4 個警告標誌(2 個不容忽視!)在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這一點。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,通過尋找其他地方,你可能會找到一筆不錯的投資。因此,來看看這份有趣的公司的免費清單吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論