share_log

Clenergy Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603628) Market Cap Rose CN¥493m Last Week; Retail Investors Who Hold 41% Profited and so Did Insiders

Clenergy Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603628) Market Cap Rose CN¥493m Last Week; Retail Investors Who Hold 41% Profited and so Did Insiders

清能科技有限公司's(SHSE: 603628)上週市值上漲了4.93億元人民幣;持有41%的散戶投資者獲利,內部人士也是如此
Simply Wall St ·  04/15 21:22

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Clenergy Technology by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • 37% of Clenergy Technology is held by insiders
  • 散戶投資者對Clenergy Technology的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 52% 的業務由前三名股東持有
  • Clenergy Technology 37% 的股份由內部人士持有

A look at the shareholders of Clenergy Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603628) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 41% to be precise, is retail investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看Clenergy科技有限公司(上海證券交易所代碼:603628)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有該公司股份最多的集團是散戶投資者,準確地說約爲41%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Retail investors gained the most after market cap touched CN¥4.8b last week, while insiders who own 37% also benefitted.

上週市值觸及48億元人民幣後,散戶投資者漲幅最大,而持有37%的內部人士也從中受益。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Clenergy Technology.

在下圖中,我們放大了Clenergy Technology的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:603628 Ownership Breakdown April 16th 2024
SHSE: 603628 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 16 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Clenergy Technology?

關於Clenergy技術,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Since institutions own only a small portion of Clenergy Technology, many may not have spent much time considering the stock. But it's clear that some have; and they liked it enough to buy in. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.

由於機構僅擁有Clenergy Technology的一小部分股份,因此許多機構可能沒有花太多時間考慮該股。但很明顯,有些人有;他們很喜歡它,足以買進。因此,如果公司本身能夠隨着時間的推移而有所改善,那麼將來我們很可能會看到更多的機構買家。如果多個機構投資者試圖同時買入股票,股價大幅上漲的情況並不少見。因此,請查看下面的歷史收益軌跡,但請記住,最重要的是未來。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:603628 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 16th 2024
SHSE: 603628 2024 年 4 月 16 日的收益和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Clenergy Technology. With a 30% stake, CEO Daniel Hong is the largest shareholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 16% and 6.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Xiao Ming Wang is also a Chairman of Corporate Board, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Clenergy Technology進行有意義的投資。首席執行官丹尼爾·洪擁有30%的股份,是最大股東。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的16%和6.5%。有趣的是,第三大股東王曉明也是公司董事會主席,這再次表明公司最大股東擁有強大的內部所有權。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 52% stake.

對股東登記冊的更詳細研究表明,前三名股東通過其52%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司進行報道,因此它可能處於雷達之下。

Insider Ownership Of Clenergy Technology

Clenergy 科技的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Clenergy Technology Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥4.8b, and insiders have CN¥1.8b worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

內部人士似乎擁有Clenergy科技有限公司的很大一部分股份。它的市值僅爲48億元人民幣,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值18億元人民幣的股票。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 41% stake in Clenergy Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Clenergy Technology41%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 17%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的17%。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Clenergy Technology , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經發現了Clenergy Technology的1個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,通過尋找其他地方,你可能會找到一筆不錯的投資。因此,來看看這份有趣的公司的免費清單吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論