share_log

0.3% Earnings Growth Over 5 Years Has Not Materialized Into Gains for Qingdao Citymedia Co (SHSE:600229) Shareholders Over That Period

0.3% Earnings Growth Over 5 Years Has Not Materialized Into Gains for Qingdao Citymedia Co (SHSE:600229) Shareholders Over That Period

5年內0.3%的收益增長尚未轉化爲青島城市媒體有限公司(SHSE: 600229)股東在此期間的收益
Simply Wall St ·  04/16 22:53

For many, the main point of investing is to generate higher returns than the overall market. But every investor is virtually certain to have both over-performing and under-performing stocks. At this point some shareholders may be questioning their investment in Qingdao Citymedia Co,. Ltd. (SHSE:600229), since the last five years saw the share price fall 16%. And the share price decline continued over the last week, dropping some 8.7%.

對於許多人來說,投資的要點是產生比整個市場更高的回報。但是,幾乎每個投資者都肯定會有表現過硬和表現不佳的股票。此時,一些股東可能會質疑他們對青島城市媒體有限公司的投資。有限公司(上海證券交易所代碼:600229),自過去五年股價下跌了16%以來。上週股價繼續下跌,下跌了約8.7%。

With the stock having lost 8.7% in the past week, it's worth taking a look at business performance and seeing if there's any red flags.

由於該股在過去一週下跌了8.7%,值得一看業務表現,看看是否有任何危險信號。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

在他的文章中 格雷厄姆和多茲維爾的超級投資者 禾倫·巴菲特描述了股價如何並不總是合理地反映企業的價值。評估公司情緒變化的一種有缺陷但合理的方法是將每股收益(EPS)與股價進行比較。

During the unfortunate half decade during which the share price slipped, Qingdao Citymedia Co actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 1.7% per year. So it doesn't seem like EPS is a great guide to understanding how the market is valuing the stock. Alternatively, growth expectations may have been unreasonable in the past.

在股價下滑的不幸五年中,青島城市媒體有限公司的每股收益(EPS)實際上每年增長1.7%。因此,每股收益似乎不是了解市場如何估值股票的好指南。或者,過去的增長預期可能不合理。

Given that EPS has increased, but the share price has fallen, it's fair to say that market sentiment around the stock has become more negative. Generally speaking, though, if the company can keep growing EPS then the share price will eventually follow.

鑑於每股收益增加了,但股價下跌了,可以公平地說,圍繞該股的市場情緒變得更加消極。但是,總的來說,如果公司能夠繼續增長每股收益,那麼股價最終將隨之增長。

You can see below how EPS has changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).

你可以在下面看到 EPS 是如何隨着時間的推移而變化的(點擊圖片發現確切的值)。

earnings-per-share-growth
SHSE:600229 Earnings Per Share Growth April 17th 2024
SHSE: 600229 每股收益增長 2024 年 4 月 17 日

It's probably worth noting that the CEO is paid less than the median at similar sized companies. It's always worth keeping an eye on CEO pay, but a more important question is whether the company will grow earnings throughout the years. It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on Qingdao Citymedia Co's earnings, revenue and cash flow.

可能值得注意的是,首席執行官的薪水低於類似規模公司的中位數。始終值得關注首席執行官的薪酬,但更重要的問題是公司多年來是否會增加收益。可能值得一看我們關於青島城市媒體公司收益、收入和現金流的免費報告。

What About Dividends?

分紅呢?

As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. In the case of Qingdao Citymedia Co, it has a TSR of -4.6% for the last 5 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!

除了衡量股價回報率外,投資者還應考慮股東總回報率(TSR)。基於股息再投資的假設,股東總回報率納入了任何分拆或貼現資本籌集的價值以及任何股息。因此,對於支付豐厚股息的公司來說,股東總回報率通常遠高於股價回報率。就青島城市媒體有限公司而言,其過去5年的股東回報率爲-4.6%。這超過了我們之前提到的其股價回報率。這在很大程度上是其股息支付的結果!

A Different Perspective

不同的視角

Although it hurts that Qingdao Citymedia Co returned a loss of 9.5% in the last twelve months, the broader market was actually worse, returning a loss of 17%. Given the total loss of 0.9% per year over five years, it seems returns have deteriorated in the last twelve months. Whilst Baron Rothschild does tell the investor "buy when there's blood in the streets, even if the blood is your own", buyers would need to examine the data carefully to be comfortable that the business itself is sound. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Qingdao Citymedia Co , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

儘管青島城市媒體公司在過去十二個月中回報了9.5%的虧損令人痛心,但整個市場實際上更糟,虧損了17%。鑑於五年來每年的總損失爲0.9%,在過去的十二個月中,回報率似乎有所下降。儘管羅斯柴爾德男爵確實告訴投資者 “街上有血時買入,即使血是你自己的”,但買家需要仔細檢查數據,以確定業務本身是健全的。儘管市場狀況可能對股價產生的不同影響值得考慮,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向青島城市媒體有限公司確定了3個警告信號,我們知道它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。

Of course Qingdao Citymedia Co may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of growth stocks.

當然,青島城市媒體股份有限公司可能不是最好的買入股票。因此,您可能希望看到這批免費的成長股。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Chinese exchanges.

請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在中國交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論