share_log

The Recent CN¥416m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Jiangsu Apon Medical Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300753)

The Recent CN¥416m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Jiangsu Apon Medical Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300753)

最近4.16億元人民幣的市值下降可能會讓投資江蘇艾邦醫療科技股份有限公司(深圳證券交易所代碼:300753)的內部人士感到失望
Simply Wall St ·  04/17 02:59

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Jiangsu Apon Medical Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 江蘇艾邦醫療科技擁有大量內部所有權,這表明公司擴張有固有的利益
  • 共有4位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • 所有權研究與過去的表現數據相結合,可以幫助人們更好地了解股票的機會

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Jiangsu Apon Medical Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300753), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 48% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制了江蘇艾邦醫療科技股份有限公司(深圳證券交易所代碼:300753),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有48%所有權的個人內部人士。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by CN¥416m.

結果,在市值下降4.16億元人民幣之後,內部人士整體遭受了最大的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Jiangsu Apon Medical Technology.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於江蘇艾邦醫療科技的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300753 Ownership Breakdown April 17th 2024
SZSE: 300753 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 17 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jiangsu Apon Medical Technology?

關於江蘇艾邦醫療科技,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Jiangsu Apon Medical Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Jiangsu Apon Medical Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,江蘇艾邦醫療科技確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看江蘇艾邦醫療科技過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300753 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 17th 2024
深圳證券交易所:300753 2024年4月17日收益和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Jiangsu Apon Medical Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Ningyu Wang with 34% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 3.5% of the stock.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對江蘇艾邦醫療科技進行有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大股東是王寧宇,已發行股份的34%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約10%和3.5%的股份。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 50% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還揭示了這樣一個事實,即公司約有50%的股份由前四名股東控制,這表明這些所有者對業務具有重大影響。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。我們目前沒有收到分析師對該股的任何報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Jiangsu Apon Medical Technology

江蘇艾邦醫療科技的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Jiangsu Apon Medical Technology Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥1.4b, and insiders have CN¥673m worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有江蘇艾邦醫療科技有限公司合理比例的股份。它的市值僅爲14億元人民幣,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值6.73億元人民幣的股票。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 41% stake in Jiangsu Apon Medical Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有江蘇艾邦醫療科技41%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Jiangsu Apon Medical Technology (of which 1 is potentially serious!) you should know about.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。比如風險。每家公司都有,我們發現了江蘇艾邦醫療科技的兩個警告信號(其中一個可能很嚴重!)你應該知道。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更願意去另一家公司看看,一家財務狀況可能更好,那麼千萬不要錯過這份由強勁財務數據支持的有趣公司的免費名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論