share_log

Retail Investors Among Cscec Scimee Sci.&Tech. Co.,Ltd's (SZSE:300425) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 18% Last Week

Retail Investors Among Cscec Scimee Sci.&Tech. Co.,Ltd's (SZSE:300425) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 18% Last Week

Cscec Scimee Sci中的散戶投資者&科技。Co., Ltd(深圳證券交易所代碼:300425)的最大股東在上週股價上漲了18%之後,其持股價值有所上漲
Simply Wall St ·  04/17 20:52

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by retail investors in Cscec Scimee Sci.&Tech.Ltd indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 21 investors have a majority stake in the company with 48% ownership
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 散戶投資者擁有Cscec Scimee Sci的大量所有權。&Tech.Ltd表示,他們在管理和業務戰略方面共同擁有更大的發言權
  • 共有21名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲48%
  • 使用公司過去業績的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

A look at the shareholders of Cscec Scimee Sci.&Tech. Co.,Ltd (SZSE:300425) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 52% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看Cscec Scimee Sci的股東。&科技。有限公司。, Ltd(深圳證券交易所代碼:300425)可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,散戶投資者擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲52%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Clearly, retail investors benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥534m last week.

顯然,在上週該公司的市值上漲了5.34億元人民幣之後,散戶投資者受益最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Cscec Scimee Sci.&Tech.Ltd.

在下圖中,我們放大了Cscec Scimee Sci的不同所有權群體。&Tech.Ltd。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300425 Ownership Breakdown April 18th 2024
SZSE: 300425 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 18 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cscec Scimee Sci.&Tech.Ltd?

關於Cscec Scimee Sci,機構所有權告訴我們什麼&Tech.Ltd?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

Less than 5% of Cscec Scimee Sci.&Tech.Ltd is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.

不到 Cscec Scimee Sci 的 5%。&Tech.Ltd 由機構投資者持有。這表明一些基金將目光投向了該公司,但許多基金尚未購買該公司的股票。如果業務從此變得更加強大,我們可能會看到更多機構熱衷於收購的情況。當多個機構投資者想要購買股票時,我們經常會看到股價上漲。過去的收入軌跡(如下所示)可以預示未來的增長,但無法保證。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300425 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 18th 2024
SZSE: 300425 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 18 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Cscec Scimee Sci.&Tech.Ltd. Our data shows that China Construction Engineering Corp. is the largest shareholder with 27% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.8% and 2.5% of the stock.

對沖基金在Cscec Scimee Sci中的股票不多。&Tech.Ltd. 我們的數據顯示,中國建築工程股份有限公司是最大股東,已發行股份的27%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約9.8%和2.5%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 21 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前21名股東共同控制的公司股份不到一半,這意味着公司的股票分佈廣泛,沒有占主導地位的股東。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Cscec Scimee Sci.&Tech.Ltd

Cscec Scimee Sci的內部所有權&Tech.Ltd

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Cscec Scimee Sci.&Tech. Co.,Ltd. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥3.4b, and insiders have CN¥306m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有Cscec Scimee Sci的部分股份。&科技。Co., Ltd. 它的市值僅爲34億元人民幣,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值3.06億元人民幣的股票。這至少顯示出一定的對齊性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 52% of Cscec Scimee Sci.&Tech.Ltd shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

公衆主要由個人投資者組成,共持有Cscec Scimee Sci52%的股份。&Tech.Ltd 的股票。有了這麼多的所有權,散戶投資者可以在影響股東回報的決策中共同發揮作用,例如股息政策和董事任命。他們還可以對可能不會提高盈利能力的收購或合併行使投票權。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 37%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的37%。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Cscec Scimee Sci.&Tech.Ltd that you should be aware of before investing here.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了 Cscec Scimee Sci 的兩個警告信號。在這裏投資之前,你應該注意的&Tech.Ltd。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我們免費收集的具有良好財務狀況的有趣潛在客戶。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論