Retail Investors Are Guangdong Fangyuan New Materials Group Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688148) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥467m
Retail Investors Are Guangdong Fangyuan New Materials Group Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688148) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥467m
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Guangdong Fangyuan New Materials Group's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 50% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
- 23% of Guangdong Fangyuan New Materials Group is held by insiders
- 廣東方圓新材集團擁有大量散戶投資者的所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
- 50% 的業務由前 11 名股東持有
- 廣東方圓新材集團23%的股份由內部人士持有
Every investor in Guangdong Fangyuan New Materials Group Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688148) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 38% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
廣東方圓新材料集團股份有限公司(SHSE: 688148)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的群體是擁有38%所有權的散戶投資者。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。
While the holdings of retail investors took a hit after last week's 18% price drop, insiders with their 23% also suffered.
儘管在上週股價下跌18%之後,散戶投資者的持股量受到打擊,但內部人士的持股量也受到衝擊,佔23%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Guangdong Fangyuan New Materials Group.
在下圖中,我們放大了廣東方圓新材料集團的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Guangdong Fangyuan New Materials Group?
關於廣東方圓新材集團,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Guangdong Fangyuan New Materials Group. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Guangdong Fangyuan New Materials Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如您所見,機構投資者持有廣東方圓新材料集團的大量股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到廣東方圓新材料集團的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Guangdong Fangyuan New Materials Group. The company's CEO Aiping Luo is the largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.1% by the third-largest shareholder.
對沖基金在廣東方圓新材料集團的股份不多。該公司首席執行官羅愛平是最大股東,持有15%的已發行股份。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約8.5%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有5.1%的所有權。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現排名前11位的合計擁有該公司的50%所有權,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。
Insider Ownership Of Guangdong Fangyuan New Materials Group
廣東方圓新材料集團的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Guangdong Fangyuan New Materials Group Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥490m worth of shares in the CN¥2.1b company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的信息表明,內部人士持有廣東方圓新材料集團有限公司的大量股份。內部人士擁有這家21億元人民幣公司價值4.9億元人民幣的股份。很高興看到內部人士對這項業務進行如此投資。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 38% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司38%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股權所有權
With a stake of 14%, private equity firms could influence the Guangdong Fangyuan New Materials Group board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
私募股權公司持有14%的股份,可能會影響廣東方圓新材料集團的董事會。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 5.1% of the Guangdong Fangyuan New Materials Group shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
我們可以看到,上市公司持有廣東方圓新材料集團5.1%的已發行股份。這可能是戰略利益,兩家公司可能有相關的商業利益。可能是他們已經消失了。這一裁定可能值得進一步調查。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Guangdong Fangyuan New Materials Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Guangdong Fangyuan New Materials Group you should be aware of, and 2 of them are a bit concerning.
擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地了解廣東方圓新材料集團,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。一個很好的例子:我們已經發現了你應該注意的廣東方圓新材集團的3個警告標誌,其中兩個有點令人擔憂。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果你更願意去另一家公司看看,一家財務狀況可能更好,那麼千萬不要錯過這份由強勁財務數據支持的有趣公司的免費名單。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。