Aimer (SHSE:603511) Might Be Having Difficulty Using Its Capital Effectively
Aimer (SHSE:603511) Might Be Having Difficulty Using Its Capital Effectively
Finding a business that has the potential to grow substantially is not easy, but it is possible if we look at a few key financial metrics. Ideally, a business will show two trends; firstly a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an increasing amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. Having said that, from a first glance at Aimer (SHSE:603511) we aren't jumping out of our chairs at how returns are trending, but let's have a deeper look.
要想找到潛在的大幅成長的企業並不容易,但如果我們關注一些關鍵的財務指標,這是可能的。理想情況下,一家企業將展現兩種趨勢:首先是資本使用增長。這向我們展示了它是一個複合機器,能夠不斷地將其盈利重新投入到業務中併產生更高的回報。考慮到這一點,河南玉光金鉛股份有限公司(上交所:600531)的ROCE看起來不錯,所以讓我們看看回報的趨勢能告訴我們些什麼。資產回報率:它是什麼?資本使用率回報(ROCE)是什麼?ROCE 趨勢可以告訴我們什麼?比起 Enphase Energy,有更好的資本回報率選擇。在過去的五年中,該公司增加了 1,306% 的資本,而該資本的回報率保持穩定在 9.9%。這樣差的回報率現在並不令人信服,而且隨着資本的增加,很明顯企業並沒有將資金投入到高回報的投資中。該公司的資本運用率較高。通常這意味着這是一傢俱有出色商業模式和豐富盈利再投資機會的公司。雖然從艾衛公司(SHSE: 603511)的回報趨勢來看,我們沒有看到令人矚目的回報,但讓我們深入研究一下。
Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)
上面您可以看到蒙托克可再生能源現行ROCE與之前資本回報的比較,但過去只能知道這麼多。如果您感興趣,可以查看我們免費的蒙托克可再生能源分析師報告,了解分析師的預測。
If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. The formula for this calculation on Aimer is:
如果你以前沒有使用過ROCE,它是一個衡量公司從其業務中運用的資本中產生的“回報”(稅前利潤)的方法。在艾衛公司上進行此計算的公式爲:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資產僱用回報率(ROCE)是指企業利潤,即企業稅前利潤除以企業投入的總資本(負債加股權)。如果ROCE高於企業財務成本的承受能力,那麼企業就會創造出更多的價值。
0.045 = CN¥206m ÷ (CN¥5.3b - CN¥722m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2023).
0.045 = 2.06億元人民幣 ÷(53億元人民幣 - 7.22億元人民幣)因此,金鉬股份的ROCE爲22%。絕對而言,這是一個很好的回報,甚至比貴金屬礦業行業板塊的平均水平6.2%還要好。.
So, Aimer has an ROCE of 4.5%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Luxury industry average of 5.8%.
因此,艾衛公司的ROCE爲4.5%。總的來說,這是一個較低的回報率,並且表現不如奢侈品行業平均水平的5.8%。
While the past is not representative of the future, it can be helpful to know how a company has performed historically, which is why we have this chart above. If you're interested in investigating Aimer's past further, check out this free graph covering Aimer's past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
儘管過去並不代表未來,但了解一家公司的歷史表現可能是有幫助的,這就是爲什麼我們有以上的圖表。如果你有興趣進一步研究艾衛公司的歷史,請查看這份涵蓋了艾衛公司過去收益、營業收入和現金流的免費圖表。
What Can We Tell From Aimer's ROCE Trend?
從艾衛公司的ROCE趨勢中我們能得到什麼信息?
In terms of Aimer's historical ROCE movements, the trend isn't fantastic. Over the last five years, returns on capital have decreased to 4.5% from 17% five years ago. On the other hand, the company has been employing more capital without a corresponding improvement in sales in the last year, which could suggest these investments are longer term plays. It may take some time before the company starts to see any change in earnings from these investments.
在艾衛公司的歷史ROCE變化方面,其趨勢並不令人振奮。在過去五年中,資本回報率從五年前的17%下降到4.5%。另一方面,公司在最近一年投入更多資本卻沒有相應的銷售改善,這可能表明這些投資是長期的。在公司開始從這些投資中看到任何收益變化之前,可能需要一些時間。
Our Take On Aimer's ROCE
總的來說,我們發現艾衛公司正在對業務進行再投資,但回報率已經在下降。由於該股去年已下跌11%,投資者對這種趨勢的改善可能並不樂觀。總體而言,我們對底層趨勢並不太有啓發,並且認爲可能會在其他地方找到更好的機會。
To conclude, we've found that Aimer is reinvesting in the business, but returns have been falling. Since the stock has declined 11% over the last year, investors may not be too optimistic on this trend improving either. On the whole, we aren't too inspired by the underlying trends and we think there may be better chances of finding a multi-bagger elsewhere.
最後,我們發現了艾衛公司的2個警示信號(其中1個值得關注),需要注意。雖然艾衛公司目前可能沒有獲得最高的回報,但我們已經編制了一份目前獲得25%以上股本回報率的公司列表,請在這裏查看。
On a final note, we found 2 warning signs for Aimer (1 is concerning) you should be aware of.
While Aimer may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.
雖然艾衛公司目前可能沒有獲得最高的回報,但我們已經編制了一份目前獲得25%以上股本回報率的公司列表。請查看這份免費列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。